LMAOOOOOOOOOO at this attempt of a dissectionA UK relationship is a little like Lewis Carroll;'s Humpty Dumpty's observation about numbers : it means whatever it means to the couple involved. There are few statutory rules yet, ( unless and until UK adopts the Australian de facto law). Given that Joe is 28 in September and Dianne has now reached 30, I think they are quite capable of deciding when and if by how much, they want to exploit the commercial side of their relationship. For example, I see they are headlines today in the Mail Online, in an article about the Chelsea Flower Show. Good luck to them..
Sorry, but i don't follow your reasoning here. You wrote:
What is disturbing you about superficial mainstream media publicity? It is what mainstream media entertainers do. If you are saying that Joe and/or Dianne should not be mainstream media personalities, what is your rationale?
You have not defined who you mean, but If, for instance, you mean outstanding actors or rock musicians, they are in a different league. Put bluntly: Joe has been a successful youtuber with a large online following.Now he has to convert his reserve, If I understand what is written on here correctly, his online followers may be diminishing, and were before he started SCD. it is pretty vital that he transitions while his youtube stock is relatively high. Any positive publicity which spreads his face and name to the nation can only be beneficial. IMO, Joe is in a particularly hard section of the media: He is neither an actor, nor a singer/dancer/ comedian. He says he wants voice-over work, but here are plenty of trained young actors who also want that work for gaming etc I would guess his best bet is to get hired for something like Blue Peter while he has an online following, then work up from there. And in the meantime, if the press take favourable shots of Dianne and him, it will not damage them .
I can only finish this with the comment to which you responded: Joe is not Peter Pan
I dont give a fuck how old Joe and Dianne are. If I believe they exploit their relationship too much, then that’s my opinion. Am I supposed to change my opinion now because they’re 30? I’m not seeing your point.
I literally said there’s plenty of mainstream media celebrities who worked hard and did not and do not exploit their relationships, due to Joe’s past opinions and stances I figured he would be one of those people.
And for an explanation (shocking that it’s needed), I mean they used their TALENT and established connections with their talent to get where they are. I don’t fuck with exploiting relationships in the media and I never will. They aren’t just taking some photos. They’re a joint brand at this point. Let’s keep it real.
To sum it all up, your point of him not being Peter Pan doesn’t make any sense or go with the point I’m trying to make. This has nothing to do with him growing up, this is about him using unappealing ways (in my eyes) to get ahead. For me I respect hard work not exploitation. You Joanne stans can try to flip it as you wish, but I’m good.