Sigh. No. Our service is quite unusual in that it's ongoing long term support. So we get to know our service users very well. We try and support them so don't reach a crisis point by ensuring they are getting all the support they need, want and are entitled to. And assess that regularly. Obviously situations change, we can see a problem brewing or some people don't want to engage until it's at crisis point. Often we are limited by what other services can provide in a timely fashion.I hate the way she talks about service users: “hungry people”. Why not just say people? They’re not baby bleeping birds, Jack. Just because they don’t have as much money as you doesn’t mean they’re useless wards of the state who would perish without you. They’re not ragamuffins crowding around the carriage of the people who’ve come from the big house. I know I’ve ranted before about the “getting people fed” thing, and this is similar. There’s something so superior about her attitude towards people.
Genuine question for fraus who work in social care or adjacent fields: do actual professionals talk about “hungry people”?
I'm confident that none of our service users are living in abject poverty. Any that do have financial issues will always have some other issues as well - MH/Drugs/Alcohol/chaotic family dynamics. Which we will offer support with but are limited by how much they want to engage. For some it's a lifestyle choice, and it is their choice. We just plod on offering support without any dramarama.