I have started reading through the Jack threads which I initially took no interest in as I actually like Jack. I will say from the outset that I continue to respect Jack's anti austerity campaigning and I don't think she is a "bad" person. However, a number the comments on here recently have made me think some aspects of her behaviour are worrying, especially for someone whose followers likely include mental health sufferers (given that she is a person on the public eye who has been open about her own MH issues) - particularly the attention she is drawing to her own weight coupled with the admissions at another point that she thinks this is the best she's looked. It may simply be a manifestation of her own (self acknowledged) MH issues that she is seeking reassurance about her looks, but I can see that doing so in this way could be damaging or triggering to others with ED issues.
Also, until I read these threads I hadn't been aware of the Jamie Oliver issue. I'm with Yel on him - I think that whilst he might get it wrong sometimes, fundamentally his heart is in the right place and so having a pop at him was not cool. At least she's held her hand up on that one though and apologised.
I've also seen this, which has confused me. Is it merely a typo on the Companies House records (only one digit different?) That would seem surprising for a government body though. She doesn't look 42 to me so I'm not immediately convinced that she's been lying about her age. But it's weird that her wikipedia page and her Companies House records show different dates of birth by ten years!? You would have thought there was a legal obligation for Companies House to have the correct details?