To be honest they are right. She's just irritating the cause now. She's been clearly left out of that letter, just go on now and spend time with your kid.Hahaha the squiggles are all asking her to do a self care Saturday and turn her internet off for the weekendThey must be new.
Hmmm, do we think it was inspired by Marcus Rashford's Hunger video for Aldi? She doesn't usually do videos (thankyou Jesus), but if lots of people were sharing that one, maybe she wanted to hop onboard...to borrow a phrase, it's "terrible". mercifully short though. it's just her reading out her "statement" in her monotonous voice
Me tooI take offense in het using Gogglebox's name in vain.
(I admit that for years I was snobbish about the idea of watching people watch TV. And then I watched it and loved it)
Why refer people to a Citizens Advice Bureau, or resources with voucher schemes or things like how to apply for the Warm Home Discount etc when you can tell them to use carrot peelings in a nut roast and rinse your baked beans?She does this all the time. A while back she was droning on about people getting their water and energy cut off giving the impression that there's nothing you can do about it when in fact there are quite strict rules about when this can happen and a lot of help available to empower people to challenge it and/or negotiate repayments to avoid it happening. She seldom promotes any advice service and never suggests people get their benefits checked to ensure they're maximising their income (there are millions of pounds in benefits sitting unclaimed). Nor does she promote any of the charitable grants out there than provide one off/short term help for people struggling. It's like she wants people to be poor and frightened, feeling like they have no way out which is both sick and dangerous.
Hmmm, do we think it was inspired by Marcus Rashford's Hunger video for Aldi? She doesn't usually do videos (thankyou Jesus), but if lots of people were sharing that one, maybe she wanted to hop onboard...
I wonder how much control Marcus has of his social accounts or if it's a team? That's no dig at him at all, he's a busy man balancing so much at the moment. If he's got a social person on his accounts or even someone heavily advising him on what to post then ignoring her is 100% a strategic decision lol. If not then I imagine he's just wondering who the hell this 12 year old looking smol activist is. I don't know which one is funnierI would love to know the true story behind Marcus Rashford and why Jack is being sidelined and unacknowledged. For that is what has happened. He has not publicly engaged with her once.
They met at the GQ shoot for the first (and possibly only) time but Jack does love to imply they have worked together for ages behind the scenes. If so it simply makes no sense for him not to have had ANY twitter conversations or even banter at all. Especially as she tags him at every opportunity.
And not being included in the letter? That is not accidental. People even commented 'don't forget Jack' in his comments and he didn't respond.
The saying she is working with him and Tom Kerridge is very odd.
I can't work out if MR just is really quite unaware of her, or is wisely not wanting to get associated with her chaos. He seems very generous with his praise and acknowledging others efforts - so it isn't a matter of wanting to keep glory for himself.
My educated guess would be that he has a social media manager that does the majority of his posts for him that just make it sound like they are coming from him. He, or more likely his management, will just sign off all the content that goes out.I wonder how much control Marcus has of his social accounts or if it's a team? That's no dig at him at all, he's a busy man balancing so much at the moment. If he's got a social person on his accounts or even someone heavily advising him on what to post then ignoring her is 100% a strategic decision lol. If not then I imagine he's just wondering who the hell this 12 year old looking smol activist is. I don't know which one is funnier
Darren verse 12:4 has killed me offGot to admit, feeling a bit like a hypocritical wanker, for being amazed and disturbed at how much time Jack spends on Twitter, when I’ve been pretty much glued to Tattle for the last 3 days...I mean working on tattle for 20 hours a day. I am praying (Darren verse 12:4) she fucks off today so I can get some shit done.
So in October 2012, a two year old had his own room, and she had the money to frame scribbles on sugar paper for godparents (who left her without lightbulbs). Does anyone recall the date that she sold his dinosaur and his effing shoes and bed?? Or not his shoes and bed, depending on which origin story she’s telling that day.I am absolutely living for screenshots of 2012 Jack blog posts so decided to do some digging on my own (I can't quite remember life before being on part-time furlough, but I definitely didn't have this much time to dedicate to honing my detective skills)
I have managed to excavate an extremely important historical artefact - an ancient scroll from 2012 that one could consider to be origin of the 'and then everybody clapped' meme
View attachment 384354
She's harmful to the greater cause. Marcus and everyone else want real change to happen, and for that you need measured rationality, not howling and clawing.I would love to know the true story behind Marcus Rashford and why Jack is being sidelined and unacknowledged. For that is what has happened. He has not publicly engaged with her once.
They met at the GQ shoot for the first (and possibly only) time but Jack does love to imply they have worked together for ages behind the scenes. If so it simply makes no sense for him not to have had ANY twitter conversations or even banter at all. Especially as she tags him at every opportunity.
And not being included in the letter? That is not accidental. People even commented 'don't forget Jack' in his comments and he didn't respond.
The saying she is working with him and Tom Kerridge is very odd.
I can't work out if MR just is really quite unaware of her, or is wisely not wanting to get associated with her chaos. He seems very generous with his praise and acknowledging others efforts - so it isn't a matter of wanting to keep glory for himself.
Oh now you've done it. She'll be off on one about how she didn't eat for 28 years during the one year of The Poverty so that her son could have bread and jam mama.First of all-never happened.
Secondly- This is all you've got Jack? Seriously, making sacrifices for your kid and this is all you came up with?
God knows what she would do if she had to do some real sacrificing for her child.
On a quick grunka but surely if she was such a superhero the ‘sodding orange piece of sugar paper’ would be put up in the kitchen so sb knew that mummy appreciated his artwork. I still have artwork from my youngest when he was at nursery, he is 25 now, likewise granddaughter made a pic with pasta and paint and it still has pride of place on the fridge, she is now 10.I am absolutely living for screenshots of 2012 Jack blog posts so decided to do some digging on my own (I can't quite remember life before being on part-time furlough, but I definitely didn't have this much time to dedicate to honing my detective skills)
I have managed to excavate an extremely important historical artefact - an ancient scroll from 2012 that one could consider to be origin of the 'and then everybody clapped' meme
View attachment 384354
He's a professional, so I expect his account to be managd for him to a certain degree, and wisely so. His work and his campaigning require focus and dedication. Social media can be a tool for that, and for profesionals is never a goal in itself.I wonder how much control Marcus has of his social accounts or if it's a team? That's no dig at him at all, he's a busy man balancing so much at the moment. If he's got a social person on his accounts or even someone heavily advising him on what to post then ignoring her is 100% a strategic decision lol. If not then I imagine he's just wondering who the hell this 12 year old looking smol activist is. I don't know which one is funnier
Yes didn't she 'quietly, gently' tell him her story. At length no doubt. Poor Marcus.I doubt she really has had much involvement beyond gurning at him whilst they rinsed beans together. Even her article she wrote about him was all about her.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?