Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Barb

Active member
Just popping this here for balance. There's a couple accounts and hashtags to investigate to see another side to this (ignore if you're comfy in your echo chamber though, not here to argue with anyone✌🏽)
Edited to change pic, focus is on accounts and hashtags.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2

pixxyy

VIP Member
I truly appreciate that you seem to have a very strong desire to see the good in people, but this part of your post is incorrect.

Yes, rapists will find a way to rape, regardless. However, Self ID makes it easier, and already dangerous, predatory men are taking advantage of this. It’s making it easier for them - it’s essentially just removing one more barrier for them.

I agree that you don’t tend to see genitals in the ladies loos. But it’s not just toilets - women-only hospital wards, domestic abuse refuges, changing rooms, women’s prisons. Those are areas where you may well see genitals, and they also have a large proportion of vulnerable women.

Again, it’s not bigotry to be concerned that predatory men may co-opt a trans persona to gain easier access to women, or to believe that some transpeople may be dangerous - this is already well documented, and examples have been given on the thread.
Making Toilets/refuges etc into a safe space for 'CIS' & transgender people I feel is quite important.
And is something that i'm sure a solution can be found.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

hrh89

VIP Member
I’m going to come across quite uneducated but I don’t really “get” what’s she’s saying or what this is about? Im clearly not clued up on this stuff. Can someone give a simple explanation? I’ve seen so many celebs on twitter literally telling her to fuck off it must be huge. People are saying she hates trans people is that right?!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

Tess256

New member
Something else has been bugging me lately too - I’d welcome others’ thoughts.

I’ve watched most seasons of Drag Race and laughed along, but there’s something that sits uncomfortably with me. Men taking the ‘glamour’ of being a woman and caricaturing - often incredibly stereotypically. They make serious money off it while all the tough bits of being female are ignored (periods/pregancy etc)...
i think it’s been acknowledged for a number of years some of the undercurrents of misogyny (see: “fish” as being a compliment of being womanly) and indeed racism of RPDR. But also RPDR is well known for excluding trans women from participating. I definitely think there’s a huge problem with in particular some white gay men and misogyny; but it’s fair to say that misogyny tends to exclude trans women also.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

DoreenYadeley

VIP Member
Please tell me what is 'womanhood' means?
And yes I will fight for my space to be safe regardless of whether it is 1% or fucking 99% of men encroaching on it!




So I am spouting hate for protecting women?


I bet you think all trans people are in all your bathrooms abusing kids and raping people don't you?

Actually they just want to piss and shit in peace like everyone else.

Stop perpetuating this trans people are paedophiles agenda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I feel like a lot of times she’s trying to do the right thing but just goes about it the wrong way. Like saying now that Dumbledore is gay just to “please the gays” and seem woke. I don’t think she’s doing it to be like “There are too gay characters!! Not my fault you didn’t notice!!” I think it’s more of a “sure, dumbledore can be gay, here’s why”

Kinda reminds me of The Fault in our Stars when they go to visit that author to see what happens after the character dies in Hazels book. He doesn’t give her an answer and she’s mad about it. I think JK is just trying to sort of let fans know that she likes their theories and wants them to sort of be cannon in the HP world.

(sorry if none of that is explained well lol but I tried)

I do agree she’s dragging it on though. The play was one thing (wish it would have toured) but Fantastic Beasts is a bit much. I was excited for the first one because it was a new Harry Potter story and I enjoy Newts character but I couldn’t even finish the second movie I was so bored. I think instead she could have done a Netflix show based on the children of the main characters, or maybe just Hogwarts without anyone relating to the main original characters.

I also agree she should stay off Twitter. It makes people hate her when they wouldn’t otherwise. I do think she’s trying, and it’s not just to look woke, she’s just not very good at educating herself on everything.

I believe she would have been the worlds first female billionaire if she hadn’t donated so much. Crazy that not all billionaires do that.

That’s my rant, sorry it’s jumbled!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

BasilRathbon

Well-known member
Whatever the arguments for or against whatever it is JK Rowling has been tweeting about, you have to wonder why she feels the need to waste her time posting on Twitter. If had her wealth and luxurious lifestyle I"d be out there having fun in the real world, having lavish holidays, going out for expensive meals and generally living the high life.

You have to wonder why her life's seemingly so empty that she's wasting it arguing with dysfunctional idiots on social media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

SqualorVictoria

VIP Member
Sure, she can think a certain way, but if she’s creating a hostile environment at work because of her refusal to refer to someone with their preferred pronoun, and it’s against company policy, then the company ultimately have the right to choose not to renew your contract. This is what the judge said:

"It is a core component of her belief that she will refer to a person by the sex she considered appropriate even if it violates their dignity and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment," he continued.

So I personally don’t see how somebody can stand with Maya and also have support for the trans community, which JK claims to do. She was deliberately misgendering people and it just seems very cruel.
Thanks for that. Like I said I didn't know enough on it but I understand more now
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

pixxyy

VIP Member
Have you ever actually looked at the amount of threats women get when they dare to speak out about this stuff? Threats of violence, death threats, doxxing, etc. These threats come from violent men dressing up as women and using their male socialisation to try and intimate women into being quiet. These men are not capable of talking about the topic in any reasonable way. It’s their way or you deserve a baseball bat. Women hiding their views due to threats of male violence is nothing new.
The fact you call them 'violent men dressing up as Women' is the whole point.
I'm not going to make excuses for the threats as there arnt any & its appalling behavior from them.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 2

Fendrel

Chatty Member
I love Jo but she has fallen down the dark Twitter rabbit hole where you feel the need to force your opinions on others. It’s why I deleted my account.

My friend works in Harvey Nicks. Jo goes in there fairly frequently and her manager has told the floor staff Jo doesn’t want them to approach her. Apparently they have to turn their head slightly away when the head stylist goes past with her picking out clothes. She apparently parks right outside with her fancy car. But then lots of people do that too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

londongirl2001

VIP Member
Ooh, I love this comeback! They think it’s such a great “gotcha” but it isn’t!

I don’t need to check someone’s genitals to know when there’s a man in the female bathrooms. The height, build, walk and mannerisms all tell me that. You really think the average trans woman is unclockable? Women can spot a man in their peripheral vision in a split second.

And before you mention that trans women need access to female bathrooms for their safety (and I’ve said this before): female bathrooms are for females, they’re not a refuge for anyone who happens to fear men.
But that's exactly what you want, because in your mind, trans women are men.

Anyway, I'll be honest, I'm scared of so much hatred (masked as fear and concern) from typical Karens who think they're fighting a feminist fight. I fully disagree with all of you and will now, genuinely, leave you to celebrate yourself and Rowling. Carry on.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2
Yeah I loved the concept (small town politics) but I didnt manage to get to the end of it. The TV show of it was good though.

I love the Cormoran Strike books and the series too. She has a great tone and I love the Britishness of the references in it.

Think the wizarding world needs leaving be though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

Barb

Active member
Lol you can’t get over how unpopular this nonsense is with 99% of the world’s population.

as for #translivesmatter, did you know that they actually have lower murder rates than average? The only transwomen likely to get killed are those who work as prostitutes.




Caster Semenya is a male. HE was just born without a penis due to androgen insensitivity. Allegedly he was brought up male, and knew of the truth, but invented a female backstory so his mediocre male self could wipe the floor with women.

It is despicable that all three medalists in the Women’s 800m at the Rio Olympics were biological males.

They should rely on genetics tests for Y chromosomes to get rid of these cheats.
She was raised female. This is not a trans issue. It's a hormone in sporting events issue.

Semenya also described a period from 2010-15 where she reluctantly agreed to take testosterone-suppressing contraceptives recommended by the I.A.A.F. so she could keep running.

She said they caused significant weight gain, made her feel sick, and led to fevers and abdominal pain. She maintained the I.A.A.F. had used her as a “lab rat” as it experimented with a medical process it would later introduce as part of its testosterone rules. In a statement Tuesday, Semenya said, “I will not allow the I.A.A.F. to use me and my body again.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

DoreenYadeley

VIP Member
In their quest for their “trans rights” they are trying to take away women’s rights in the process. Like the rights to access single sex spaces without someone who labels themselves as a woman being able to enter that space. They arent just trying to get on with their lives.

And they are 100% erasing lesbian and gay people. Imagine trying to find a same sex partner and being told that you are transphobic for wanting to be with an actual woman instead of a person with a penis and a lifetime of male socialisation. It’s ridiculous.
How many trans people do you know irl? From your rhetoric I'm guessing none.

Your points are laughable. No one is forcing anyone to engage sexually with trans people. I honestly don't know where the majority of you people are getting your opinions from.

I'm guessing the Daily Mail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2

StephenTJackson

VIP Member
That first book she did post Potter under her own name, The Casual Vancancy, That was bloody awful I thought. I found it really boring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2