Course not, just her mealy mouthed tweet about 'trans people are who they say they are' and encouraging people to donate to Mermaids
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
For someone who has built her personal brand on being a champion of women, it’s pretty tit of her to not condemn the hatred directed at JK.
Emma Watson is the poster girl for white privileged "feminism" 
There's many people that didn't even read her essay but are just repeating the crap they heard on social media about her being a transphobe. I have asked many, many anti JK Rowling people for *specific quotes* on what she has said that's transphobic but no one can ever answer- they'll go off on one about how trans people face more violence than anyone else and JK Rowling is contributing to that but no one can ever give a specific example of anything bad she has said
I know, would have been more effective at the time for sure. But maybe he didn't realise the vitriol would still be as strong as it was
I saw this tweet. Gimme a break!
I saw this tweet. Gimme a break!
Attachments
Agreed, though possibly some celebs don’t really follow/log into social media much so they miss some stuff in realtime.
But yes, JKR could have done with some helpful voices last year.
No of course not
but at least she has done us all a favour and given up acting mow 
Thank goodness, because I watched The Circle with her and Tom Hanks in it and she was so wooden. She would not have got the Beauty and the Beast gig, or her many millions of pounds without JKR’s books, the least she could have done is take a middle stance and say she believed TWAW but condemn the specific witchhunt against JKR - I could ALMOST respect that but no, she just said TWAW and left the angry mobs to vilify JKR. With her social influence Emma could have done her bit to help calm the furore a bit. To think I used to want to be her when growing up!No of course not
What also really upset me about fauxmenist Emma was that she showed not a shred of empathy for JK Rowling when JK opened up about her domestic abuse story.
No because she’s a spineless libfem
Rupert Grint felt he needed to stand up for transgender people
The actor, 32, explained his decision to voice his opposition to the comments saying that while he has a 'huge respect' for Rowling, he can still disagree with her views.
Of course he makes no reference to why he thinks she's transphobic or to anything she actually said. Its just to make sure all the wokerati know he's on the 'correct' side
That rat-faced looking ginger prick is trying to save his arse in the hope that Jo Rowling might consider him for work in her latest enterprise. I’m sure she won’t though.So not being content with maligning JK once this ginger tosser thinks that he should pop up again.Rupert Grint felt he needed to stand up for transgender people
The actor, 32, explained his decision to voice his opposition to the comments saying that while he has a 'huge respect' for Rowling, he can still disagree with her views.www.dailymail.co.uk
Of course he makes no reference to why he thinks she's transphobic or to anything she actually said. Its just to make sure all the wokerati know he's on the 'correct' side
Another one who owes his career to JKR. He can't act either, he just looked the part at the time.
I hate the misogyny with this industry. Actors have stood by / turned a blind eye to big hollywood producers or actors who abused women and children yet they bring pitch forks and bile for a woman just because she said don't forget womens' requirements for sex based protection and sex based language...
Makes you wonder what Stonewall might have on him, doesn’t it?
It because of JK Rowling, that he has a platform to express his opinions.
Without JK Rowling all three would have been lucky to get a role as an extra on Corrie.
- Status