Isabelle Rose Welsh

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Day 10 - Toddler murder and sexual abuse Trial.

Over 100 internal and external injuries on toddler explained to the jury

Court hears how toddler Isabelle Welsh was beaten, sexually violated and killed, say prosecutors

Teesside Crown Court sat in stunned silence as jurors were shown a macabre body-map of tiny Isabelle Welsh:

- Twenty-one bones snapped at different times;

- Ninety-seven cuts, bruises and scratches blotched across her face, torso and limbs;

- A vicious tear to her genital area;

- A fatal skull fracture that left the two-year-old’s brain bleeding and her heart stuttering to a stop on 14 September 2025.

Home Office pathologist Dr Sam Hoggard told the jury the child’s “catalogue of trauma” could only have come from “repeated, deliberate violence” visited upon her “over at least three separate assaults in the weeks before she died.”

Specialist eye-doctor Dr Jo McPartland added that the toddler’s eyes were riddled with so many haemorrhages “I lost count,” a classic sign, she said, of ferocious shaking.

Prosecutors allege that violence—and a final, murderous assault—came from the very people sworn to protect her: Isabelle’s mother, Alexandra Walker, 25, of Hartington Close, Thornaby, and Walker’s new boyfriend, Harrison Simpson, 22, of Greenham Close, Thorntree, Middlesbrough.

Both stand accused of murder. They also face charges of causing or allowing the death of a child, two counts of assault by penetration committed between 10 and 14 September, and cruelty to a child under sixteen.

Each defendant denies every allegation, insisting Isabelle’s catastrophic injuries were accidental.

From the witness box, Dr Hoggard painted a picture of sustained torture. Isabelle’s arms, legs, spine—even her skull—had been broken and re-broken as the weeks ticked by.

The fatal blow, he said, almost certainly occurred on the day emergency services were called: Isabelle was “gripped and shaken with vigour”, then slammed, head-first, against “a wall or floor”, causing her skull to crack and her brain to haemorrhage.

Earlier, jurors heard that the toddler’s genital injuries included a laceration to her mole. “The only plausible explanation,” Dr Hoggard declared, “is that she was sexually assaulted before she died.”

Simpson, seated in the dock beside Walker, occasionally shook his head; Walker stared at the floor.

Their defence teams argue that Isabelle’s injuries were the tragic result of clumsiness and a series of unfortunate tumbles.

But lead prosecutor Imogen Eastham-Brown scoffed at the suggestion. “Ladies and gentlemen,” she told the jury, “children aged two do not rack up twenty-one fractures—at different stages of healing—by falling out of bed.

They do not sustain intimate injuries by accident. Isabelle was brutalised, sexually violated and, ultimately, murdered.”

Judge Mr Justice Adams reminded jurors that the defendants are “entitled to the presumption of innocence” until the prosecution proves its case beyond reasonable doubt.

The trial continues, with harrowing medical testimony expected to dominate the week ahead.
 
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Like
Reactions: 23
Not sure why he’s shaking his head… and the mother sat there staring? I’d be sobbing if all those injuries were being read out about my baby. Disgusting excuse of a mother:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
I don't think the step-dad was in the kitchen laughing with AW. He was in the garden silent. She giggled when a paramedic asked who he was, and she said dad - not Isabelle's dad. This is what I think I read in the updates. He also cried when relaying what happened in the house in his police interview.

Where was Isabelle's actual dad during this time?
As a pp said I think there were accusations of DV with Isabelle’s dad, and possibly AW kept Isabelle away from him, but how much he tried we’ll probably never know. I took a look at his fb and since the poor child’s death he’s posted constantly about his daughter, although I may be being cynical, it comes across as a bit attention grabbing as there doesnt seem to be any postings about Isabelle previous to her death.
The whole family on both sides totally failed her as far as I’m concerned.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 21
I don't think a woman can be charged with that? It would be assault with a foreign object I thought
I feel sick writing this, but I assumed the charge meant that AW helped HS by holding poor Isabelle down so he could do what he wanted to her. I think that might be why she had all those scratches on her body :cry:
 
  • Sad
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 12
I feel sick writing this, but I assumed the charge meant that AW helped HS by holding poor Isabelle down so he could do what he wanted to her. I think that might be why she had all those scratches on her body :cry:
I was confused by AW charges and if she was also being done for sexual assault, as was like why is she googling about blood in nappies & if she was participating in the sexual abuse? - but I could only find that those charges related to the boyfriend so wonder if it’s just the way the headlines were being written? Unless someone can do better than I did and find that she actually is charged with SA as well. I couldn’t seem to find a CPS page like there was for Preston.

Her googling the blood etc was the only thing that made me think she didnt realise he had grape Isabelle & I was assuming that happened when AW was sleeping off the drink after beating Isabelle to a pulp. I wouldn’t be surprised however if she was involved. Pure evil guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
I was confused by AW charges and if she was also being done for sexual assault, as was like why is she googling about blood in nappies & if she was participating in the sexual abuse? - but I could only find that those charges related to the boyfriend so wonder if it’s just the way the headlines were being written? Unless someone can do better than I did and find that she actually is charged with SA as well. I couldn’t seem to find a CPS page like there was for Preston.

Her googling the blood etc was the only thing that made me think she didnt realise he had grape Isabelle & I was assuming that happened when AW was sleeping off the drink after beating Isabelle to a pulp. I wouldn’t be surprised however if she was involved. Pure evil guys.
See, I think she was actively involved with the SA and googled about blood in nappies to see if she could blame it on something else. Because she knew by that stage that Isabelle was going to die or at the very least end up in hospital and many questions would be asked about the awful state this child was in.
Admittedly, my opinions are affected by the many years I spent working with vulnerable children, who had often been abused :cry:
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 22
Cross examination
Mark McKone KC, representing Alexandra Walker, is now cross examining Dr Duplessis.

He asks about the impact of the older head injury and whether she would have been lethargic.

The doctor says there is a likelihood that she could have shown signs of lethargy and could have started to improve.

Mr McKone asks whether Isabelle could have watched tv or eaten her breakfast after suffering the fatal head injury. Dr Duplessis simply replies: "No."






I don’t know if it’s badly written but the cross examination always seems to be in Isabelle’s favour??
 
Hearing adjourned
The hearing has adjourned for the week.

Mrs Justice Norton has told the jury that they will not be required on Monday or Tuesday and the trial will resume on Wednesday when the prosecution is expected to conclude its case.

Why is there so many breaks??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Hearing adjourned
The hearing has adjourned for the week.

Mrs Justice Norton has told the jury that they will not be required on Monday or Tuesday and the trial will resume on Wednesday when the prosecution is expected to conclude its case.

Why is there so many breaks??
Perhaps it's to protect the jury from further horror overload. I haven't bee able to bring myself to read all of the stuff on here - they will have had to read it (in much greater detail) look at photographs, listen to descriptions of the brutality - I can't imagine how it must affect them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Perhaps it's to protect the jury from further horror overload. I haven't bee able to bring myself to read all of the stuff on here - they will have had to read it (in much greater detail) look at photographs, listen to descriptions of the brutality - I can't imagine how it must affect them.
ah okay, that makes sense. Just comparing it to Preston’s which was on every week day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Live coverage of Thornaby toddler Isabelle Welsh murder trial - Day 11
Live
By Graeme Hetherington

Read bottom to top …

12:56pm 10/07/26
Hearing adjourned
The hearing has adjourned for the week.
Mrs Justice Norton has told the jury that they will not be required on Monday or Tuesday and the trial will resume on Wednesday when the prosecution is expected to conclude its case.

12:30pm 10/07/26
Cross examination
Mark McKone KC, representing Alexandra Walker, is now cross examining Dr Duplessis.
He asks about the impact of the older head injury and whether she would have been lethargic.
The doctor says there is a likelihood that she could have shown signs of lethargy and could have started to improve.
Mr McKone asks whether Isabelle could have watched tv or eaten her breakfast after suffering the fatal head injury. Dr Duplessis simply replies: "No."

12:00pm 10/07/26
Evidence conclusion
Dr Duplessis says it is clear that the skull fracture was the cause of death and ruled out that it was caused accidentally.

11:58am 10/07/26
Loss of consciousness
Dr Duplessis says she may not have lost consciousness but she would be clearly very unwell and she would immediately deteriorate.
"If she wasn't in a coma from the outset, she would have been unresponsive and floppy," he says.
He tells the jury that it is impossible to accurately determine the time the fatal injury was inflicted as they could have been unconscious for several hours before they go into cardiac arrest.

11:53am 10/07/26
Fatal injury
Dr Duplessis says she suffered a major impact to the skull evident from the fracture but there must have also been very excessive motion of the spine and the head on the spine.
He says there could have been two separate incidents - head impact and violent shaking - but says they could have happened at the same time.
The jury hears there were fractures to Isabelle's limbs being gripped which shows she could have been held and swung against a solid object.
"I would favour that she was gripped by the limbs and flung against a surface," he says. "But it is also possible that there were two events - I can't be certain."
He says shaking is rarely fatal for children of Isabelle's age - a two-year-old would be more physically capable of dealing with the shaking.

11:46am 10/07/26
Brain damage
Dr Duplessis says Isabelle was not getting oxygen or blood to the brain after she suffered a heart attack.
He says she could have started suffering brain damage before the paramedics were called.
"There could have been a period where she suffered critical or fatal brain damage before he paramedics arrived," he says.
The jury hears that the damage to her brain was so severe that an emergency operation to relieve pressure could not have saved her life.
The doctor confirms that there was evidence to two incidents of damage to Isabelle's brain but the event on September 13 was what caused the toddler's death.

11:39am 10/07/26
Spinal chord
Dr Duplessis says there was no response to the injury suffered to Isabelle's spinal column meaning it occurred no more than 48 hours before death.
He says if you find bleeding around the spinal column it rarely occurs in an accidental fashion and shows she was victim to a major non-accidental event causing damage to her head and spine.
The jury hears how there was also evidence of bleeding on the nerve roots - some were from within 48hrs but some were older.
Richard Wright KC asks whether the bleeds could have occurred at the same time as the spinal fractures which Isabelle suffered several days before she died.
The doctor agrees.
The doctor says there was also evidence of older fractures to the top of Isabelle's spine.

11:28am 10/07/26
Older injury
Dr Duplessis says the earlier injured occurred in the days or weeks before Isabelle died.
He says he was unable to say whether that one was an accidental or non-accidental injury.
The jury hears how the doctor inspected the 'bruising' under a microscope which determined it occurred around four days before her death when there was another impact on her head.
He says 'we are not talking about extreme level of force' but it was more than an every day knock to the head.
The doctor says the fibres are like electrical wires which transmit information around different parts of the brain.
The corpus callosum is a section of nerve fibres that connect the brain's left and right hemispheres to enable them to communicate.
He says there was damage to the corpus callosum which was caused by shaking or the impact from the skull fracture.

11:19am 10/07/26
Non-accidental injury
Dr Duplessis says there is strong evidence that the bleed on the brain was a non-accidental injury.
He says there wasn't just one area affected by bleeding which tends to mean that they were not caused in an accident unless Isabelle fell from a building, a road traffic collision or crush injuries.
The jury hears that there was no evidence to indicate any of those situations occurred before Isabelle's death.
"There can be no doubt that this was a traumatic injury," he says.
The jury hears how a vein had torn from the brain resulting in bleeding inside the skull within 24hrs of her death. He says there was also an older bleed discovered during his examinations.
"Looking with the naked eye I could see discolouration which was different from the fresh injury. It was something that might be slightly older because of the change in colour," he says.

11:05am 10/07/26
Head injuries
Dr Duplessis says the bleed on the brain was up to 48 hours but it could be just an hour old as well.
He confirms that it is not days old because there is no evidence of the body natural response to the injury.
The medical expert says there was bleeding in multiple areas of the brain and he ruled out any natural cause for the injury.
He says there is evidence that she suffered traumatic injury due to the multiple bleeds.
"It's likely a non-accidental event but an event caused by forceful movement of the head," he says.
The doctor tells the jury that a rise in pressure caused by the bleed and blood clot can become life-threatening adding that it doesn't take a great deal of blood to cause death.

10:48am 10/07/26
First witness
Dr Daniel Duplessis, a consultant neuropathologist, is the first witness to give evidence today.
He studied the damage to Isabelle's brain and spinal chord.
Jurors hear how he inspected her brain with the naked eye and under specialist microscopes.
He says he examined a blood clot that was essential for him to be able to age the damage to the brain.

10:42am 10/07/26
Trial resumes
You can read a round up of yesterday's evidence here - Toddler Isabelle Welsh suffered sexual and physical abuse, trial hears
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 16
Hearing adjourned
The hearing has adjourned for the week.

Mrs Justice Norton has told the jury that they will not be required on Monday or Tuesday and the trial will resume on Wednesday when the prosecution is expected to conclude its case.

Why is there so many breaks??
It could be legal arguments/submissions to the judge for which jury doesn't hear
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
As a pp said I think there were accusations of DV with Isabelle’s dad, and possibly AW kept Isabelle away from him, but how much he tried we’ll probably never know. I took a look at his fb and since the poor child’s death he’s posted constantly about his daughter, although I may be being cynical, it comes across as a bit attention grabbing as there doesnt seem to be any postings about Isabelle previous to her death.
The whole family on both sides totally failed her as far as I’m concerned.
I didn’t like to say what I was thinking but you read my thoughts .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Oh yeah that was me on the Preston Davey thread. I was trying to demonstrate the power of photo evidence that the jury see but the public don’t. Sometimes when we are reading evidence about bruises, I think we are imagining typical child accidental bruises as most of us won’t have seen bruises more severe from abuse.

Once the photo of Star Hobson was released after conviction it was easy to see why Frankie could not possibly have had no idea Star was being beaten by Brockhill.

Honestly this picture of Star makes me cry. The bruise is deep, vivid and goes up to her forehead and down to her neck.
Not that it justifys anything but that was a punch, not a slap.
Punching a baby. I cannot. Wtf is wrong with people!!
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I'm sorry to take everyone's thoughts there, but I can't imagine a baby fighting against SA. They'd be so confused, I don't think you'd need to hold them down. I don't think the mother held Isabelle down, because I think Isabelle would have been compliant if her mother was there. Cus she trusted her.
Which makes it bleeping worse!!
 
  • Sad
Reactions: 2
Has anyone come across AW’s mum? Someone a few comments back said that AW must have been a raging alcoholic and I keep thinking the same about the grandmother. I can’t understand how someone could enable that level of drinking around a child or turn a blind eye to the state Isabelle was in. Of course, she could simply be an irresponsible low life I’m not making excuses for her either way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Their defence teams argue that Isabelle’s injuries were the tragic result of clumsiness and a series of unfortunate tumbles.

This makes me sick. What kind of a person would defend this and pretend it was caused by 'tumbles'. Despicable people.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 12