Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Boogs

VIP Member
Sadly some women prioritise having a man over their kids. My mother is one of them. She experienced CSA and definitely has an undiagnosed personality disorder. She would meet a bloke and bring him straight home getting engaged 2 days later. Despite her childhood experiences (which sadly she doesn’t see as abuse) she had no protective feelings towards her kids. She saw me as a rival. I remember a boyfriend of hers making me really uncomfortable coming and lying on my single bed asking me to read to him. She came into the room and was clearly angry telling him to get downstairs. For a minute I felt grateful until I realised it was me she was angry with when she hissed at me through gritted teeth ‘he’s my boyfriend not yours.’ I was about 10 at the time.
 
  • Sad
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 49
Her mother should have called social services. There’s no excuse. If they removed Isabelle she would still be alive and maybe even placed with family while AW sorted out her mess of a life. She couldn’t even look after herself let alone a toddler. I have direct experience of having my kids removed due to my own alcoholism and though it was traumatic for all it literally saved my life and allowed us to become a family again once I was better. I also have a family member who had a chaotic life with drugs, alcohol and violent men. Her own mother reported it to social and her kids now live with family members and are thriving, she didn’t turn her life around at the time but still had contact so they only saw her at her best. I hate seeing all these videos of “social kidnapped my kids for no reason and I’ve not seen them for six months despite having done nothing wrong”. Sure Jan! It adds to the mistrust around reporting and prevents kids receiving the help they need. We all know SS get it wrong and make mistakes sometimes by not removing when they should but if someone had been contacted on that day the police would have used emergency protection powers to remove Isabelle to a place of safety when they saw the state of the adults in charge of her. There are so many failings among professionals in this case (and others) and each one was a missed opportunity to save that poor little girl. But none of them knew what the family did because nobody told them.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 40

Borrible

VIP Member
Sadly some women prioritise having a man over their kids. My mother is one of them. She experienced CSA and definitely has an undiagnosed personality disorder. She would meet a bloke and bring him straight home getting engaged 2 days later. Despite her childhood experiences (which sadly she doesn’t see as abuse) she had no protective feelings towards her kids. She saw me as a rival. I remember a boyfriend of hers making me really uncomfortable coming and lying on my single bed asking me to read to him. She came into the room and was clearly angry telling him to get downstairs. For a minute I felt grateful until I realised it was me she was angry with when she hissed at me through gritted teeth ‘he’s my boyfriend not yours.’ I was about 10 at the time.
I had a similar parent. My mother kicked me out when I was 15 when her latest bloke took an inappropriate shine to me. She didn't kick me out to save me from him. She kicked me out because she was jealous! Before that, I'd had years of various blokes of hers pinching my arse, offering to give me 'massages', kissing me full on the mouth etc. And she let them. We've not been in contact for decades and we never will.
 
  • Sad
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: 39

Borrible

VIP Member
Honestly it's not rocket science.

Random bloke (who doesn't want to meet you) moves in with your daughter and then very quickly your grandchild has a broken leg and bruising? Do me a favour
 
  • Like
Reactions: 38

Tanley

VIP Member
The above sounds like it was the mother that caused Isabelle’s fatal head injury.
How cold do you have to be to call your two year old a Cnut when she is in pain from an untreated broken leg :mad:
And then the Nan pops round with ten cans of Stella and says it’s too upsetting to see her granddaughter deteriorating :mad:
Not to mention AW stabbing herself and smashing up the kitchen.
This poor little girl was in a horrible and abusive home situation even without the scummy boyfriend moving in and SA her :cry:
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Angry
Reactions: 37

TheMiceInTheShed

VIP Member
This just defies belief. Too upsetting for her?? How the fuck did she think it was for Isabelle then?

I cannot envisage a scenario where I could see a baby in this state and not somehow find a way to remove her from the situation.
Agree.

I couldn't turn my back on a suffering rat caught in a trap, never mind a BABY - and my own grandchild at that!

If I suspected there was anything amiss (and she obviously did) I would have moved Hell and high water to get the authorities involved somehow, I would have offered to have her for a sleepover and taken her to hospital, I would have alerted the police and social services, I would have rung the NSPCC. I would have just gone in, if necessary and carried that baby out of the house away from that drunken, drug addled pair of sh*tballs.

This isn't a situation where the child's abuse has been hidden - it has been on full show - to the extent that it was "too upsetting" to look at, and she just pushed it out of her mind. Both "grandparents" did. I hope they rot.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 36

bigmac22

Well-known member
Hopefully this helps with the timeline, the accuracy of the available reporting is inconsistent causing confusion.

Prosecution have demonstrated a pattern of neglect and hostility towards Isabelle weeks before her final collapse.
CCTV visually shows AW growing highly annoyed and verbally frustrated with her crying child limping around the home due to a broken leg. Rather than comforting her, AW snaps at the crying toddler, aggressively “What do you want?”

Richard Wright KC said “There are a lot of incidents of the two drinking and drugs being taken, and the prosecution say, unusual and sometimes aggressive behaviour being caught on CCTV” There were instances where Walker was getting “irritated” by Isabelle's behaviour. On one occasion Walker said her daughter was “behaving like a cunt”

On the 12th of September, Isabelle was in obvious pain, whimpering, screaming, and crying for her mother. The court heard that she had developed a bruise on her forehead and had started vomiting again. CCTV evidence showed AW repeatedly telling the toddler to “sit up!”

In the afternoon, AW messaged her mother to complain that Isabelle was throwing up again and that seeing her daughter like that was causing her “stress”, she requested that her mother bring her food, nappies, and 10 cans of Stella to “help her cope” Knowing her mother was coming to drop off the shopping, AW messaged HS trying to persuade him to meet her mother. AW reassured him in the text that her mum “won't bite” but, HS refused the interaction, and AW later claimed to her mother that he couldn't meet her because he suffered from severe “anxiety”

4.46pm A telephone recording captured the sound of a whimpering Isabelle lying on top of AW, she told the person on the other end of the line that her daughter “really isn't well”

5.30pm AW’s mother and stepfather arrived at the Hartington Close property to drop off the requested shopping and alcohol. Her mother Claire later stated it had become too upsetting to see her granddaughter in that deteriorating condition.

7pm AW was alone in the house with Isabelle a neighbour reported hearing a loud thud coming from the property.

9pm HS returned to the home. At this point, the couple began a heavy session of drinking and substance use.

The couple continued drinking alcohol and smoking cannabis from a bong late into the night and until 3am on September 13th, completely ignoring the toddler's ongoing medical distress.

AW called her mother and a friend (Sarah Ayre??) while heavily under the influence of alcohol. During these recorded calls, she aggressively insisted that she had been stabbed in her arm, chest, and leg during a separate incident where cannabis was allegedly stolen from her home. When challenged by the person on the other end of the line about her drinking, AW angrily denied that she was “making a drama” before lashing out around 2am and striking her kitchen cupboard doors. Sarah told the court AW’s speech sounded unusual, she was muttering her words, leading her to believe AW was “on something” at the time.

CCTV shows AW was highly agitated, dramatic, and focused entirely on her own historical grievances while Isabelle, was severely injured in the house. The home security footage actually captured her stabbing herself with a kitchen knife during the same time frame, while her boyfriend HS, smoked cannabis nearby.

AW did not leave the house during the hours leading up to her daughter’s collapse on September 13th. AW falsely claims she briefly left the house to visit a local shop & would wake Isabelle when HS returned the prosecution say this was a

2.53pm, AW messaged HS stating she intended to wake Isabelle up when he returned from the shops. She added that if she didn't wake the toddler now, Isabelle would be “up all night” Following this exchange, HS was the one captured on CCTV leaving the property permanently shortly after 3pm.

HS had been awake and in “sole care” of Isabelle during the morning while AW remained in bed upstairs. HS told AW that he had put the toddler down to sleep.

Isabelle was neither seen nor heard on the internal home CCTV during the morning September 13th. The prosecution highlighted the lack of presence to support their argument that Isabelle was already incapacitated or critically injured early in the day.

3pm HS left the property, internal CCTV and court records show that AW remained inside the house, completely failing to check on or help her dying daughter. However AW told her family that she checked on Isabelle every 10 minutes.

Within 10 minutes of her HS leaving the house at 3pm, AW’s primary focus was not providing medical care. Instead, she was running Google searches for why her toddler was bleeding.

3.15pm Internal CCTV captured AW walking up the stairs and speaking to herself, saying, “You're scaring me” She then ran another search for “What should I do if my child has blood in his stool”

3.20pm Rather than leaving the property to seek help or calling an ambulance, AW walked into the kitchen to smoke a cigarette!

4pm Still inside the property, AW called her stepfather instead of emergency services. Knowing her stepfather, Dan Ackroyd, was on his way, AW actively took the cannabis bong out of the kitchen and discarded it next to an outdoor bin to hide the drug use.

4.14pm Her stepfather arrived at the property, found the toddler unresponsive at the bottom of the stairs, and ordered AW to call 999.
Thanks for posting this.

Something else that has stuck with me is that the mum posted photos of her freshly dyed hair on Facebook on 12th September. She found the time to dye her hair, take selfies and share them online while Isabelle had endured horrific abuse and was likely by that point, critically ill and dying.

I genuinely don’t think there’s a sentence in the English language that could adequately describe how vile that is. I’m heartbroken for Isabelle.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 35

OGJessicaFletcher

VIP Member
Hopefully this helps with the timeline, the accuracy of the available reporting is inconsistent causing confusion.

Prosecution have demonstrated a pattern of neglect and hostility towards Isabelle weeks before her final collapse.
CCTV visually shows AW growing highly annoyed and verbally frustrated with her crying child limping around the home due to a broken leg. Rather than comforting her, AW snaps at the crying toddler, aggressively “What do you want?”

Richard Wright KC said “There are a lot of incidents of the two drinking and drugs being taken, and the prosecution say, unusual and sometimes aggressive behaviour being caught on CCTV” There were instances where Walker was getting “irritated” by Isabelle's behaviour. On one occasion Walker said her daughter was “behaving like a cunt”

On the 12th of September, Isabelle was in obvious pain, whimpering, screaming, and crying for her mother. The court heard that she had developed a bruise on her forehead and had started vomiting again. CCTV evidence showed AW repeatedly telling the toddler to “sit up!”

In the afternoon, AW messaged her mother to complain that Isabelle was throwing up again and that seeing her daughter like that was causing her “stress”, she requested that her mother bring her food, nappies, and 10 cans of Stella to “help her cope” Knowing her mother was coming to drop off the shopping, AW messaged HS trying to persuade him to meet her mother. AW reassured him in the text that her mum “won't bite” but, HS refused the interaction, and AW later claimed to her mother that he couldn't meet her because he suffered from severe “anxiety”

4.46pm A telephone recording captured the sound of a whimpering Isabelle lying on top of AW, she told the person on the other end of the line that her daughter “really isn't well”

5.30pm AW’s mother and stepfather arrived at the Hartington Close property to drop off the requested shopping and alcohol. Her mother Claire later stated it had become too upsetting to see her granddaughter in that deteriorating condition.

7pm AW was alone in the house with Isabelle a neighbour reported hearing a loud thud coming from the property.

9pm HS returned to the home. At this point, the couple began a heavy session of drinking and substance use.

The couple continued drinking alcohol and smoking cannabis from a bong late into the night and until 3am on September 13th, completely ignoring the toddler's ongoing medical distress.

AW called her mother and a friend (Sarah Ayre??) while heavily under the influence of alcohol. During these recorded calls, she aggressively insisted that she had been stabbed in her arm, chest, and leg during a separate incident where cannabis was allegedly stolen from her home. When challenged by the person on the other end of the line about her drinking, AW angrily denied that she was “making a drama” before lashing out around 2am and striking her kitchen cupboard doors. Sarah told the court AW’s speech sounded unusual, she was muttering her words, leading her to believe AW was “on something” at the time.

CCTV shows AW was highly agitated, dramatic, and focused entirely on her own historical grievances while Isabelle, was severely injured in the house. The home security footage actually captured her stabbing herself with a kitchen knife during the same time frame, while her boyfriend HS, smoked cannabis nearby.

AW did not leave the house during the hours leading up to her daughter’s collapse on September 13th. AW falsely claims she briefly left the house to visit a local shop & would wake Isabelle when HS returned the prosecution say this was a

2.53pm, AW messaged HS stating she intended to wake Isabelle up when he returned from the shops. She added that if she didn't wake the toddler now, Isabelle would be “up all night” Following this exchange, HS was the one captured on CCTV leaving the property permanently shortly after 3pm.

HS had been awake and in “sole care” of Isabelle during the morning while AW remained in bed upstairs. HS told AW that he had put the toddler down to sleep.

Isabelle was neither seen nor heard on the internal home CCTV during the morning September 13th. The prosecution highlighted the lack of presence to support their argument that Isabelle was already incapacitated or critically injured early in the day.

3pm HS left the property, internal CCTV and court records show that AW remained inside the house, completely failing to check on or help her dying daughter. However AW told her family that she checked on Isabelle every 10 minutes.

Within 10 minutes of her HS leaving the house at 3pm, AW’s primary focus was not providing medical care. Instead, she was running Google searches for why her toddler was bleeding.

3.15pm Internal CCTV captured AW walking up the stairs and speaking to herself, saying, “You're scaring me” She then ran another search for “What should I do if my child has blood in his stool”

3.20pm Rather than leaving the property to seek help or calling an ambulance, AW walked into the kitchen to smoke a cigarette!

4pm Still inside the property, AW called her stepfather instead of emergency services. Knowing her stepfather, Dan Ackroyd, was on his way, AW actively took the cannabis bong out of the kitchen and discarded it next to an outdoor bin to hide the drug use.

4.14pm Her stepfather arrived at the property, found the toddler unresponsive at the bottom of the stairs, and ordered AW to call 999.
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 34

zogsmum

Active member
10:38am23/06/26
Case outline
The jury for the trial was sworn in yesterday afternoon and Richard Wright KC, prosecuting, will be opening the case against the two defendants this morning.
The barrister will be giving an outline of the prosecution case before the evidence begins after Isabelle Rose Welsh died last year.
Harrison Simpson, 22, and 25-year-old Alexandra Walker, are charged with the murder of the toddler in Thornaby on September 14.
They both pleaded not guilty to the charge when they made an appearance at Teesside Crown Court.

11:37am23/06/26
Prosecution opening
The Honourable Ms Justice Norton has spoken to the jury about their roles and responsibilities before the trial can begin.
Mr Wright is now addressing the jury as the trial gets underway.
The barrister will go through events leading up to the death of the toddler on September 13 last year and the investigations carried out to find the cause.
He says: "A 999 call was made to the emergency operator from a house at Hartington Close in Thornaby.
"The caller was the female defendant Alexandra Walker and she was calling about her two-year-old daughter Isabelle. Isabelle was in a state of collapse.
"She was gravely unwell and her heart had stopped beating.
"A call of that sort to the emergency services results in a priority response from the ambulance service and in this case a team of paramedics were at the property within a minute of being alerted to the request for an ambulance."

11:40am23/06/26
Medical evidence (warning graphic details)
He continues: "They found Isabelle on her back at the foot of the stairs. She had no pulse and was plainly gravely ill.
"Her body was covered in bruises, in particular she was very obviously bruised to her head, neck, abdomen, back, the area around her vagina and her anus.
"Her nappy contained blood and her face was contaminated with the remnants of vomit.
"She was rushed to the hospital by ambulance where she was treated by a team of specialist doctors but sadly, they could not save her, and she died in the early hours of the September 14.
"Isabelle’s death was not the result of some form of naturally occurring illness. She died because shortly before her terminal collapse somebody had inflicted a massive head injury upon her.
"Her skull had been fractured, her brain had been injured, and her heart had stopped as a result of that assault upon her.
"The mechanism of that injury involved Isabelle being violently shaken with her head and spine flexing and over extending, with her head impacting a hard and unyielding surface such as a wall or the floor.
"This was no accident. It was the deliberate infliction of injury on that little girl. It was, say the prosecution, murder."
 
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 32

bigmac22

Well-known member
Huge red flag, he wouldn’t meet her because he had anxiety apparently. Can you imagine letting a new boyfriend move into your home and coming out with this load of twaddle.

I’m not blaming the Grandmother/Step Grandad at all but for reasons unknown they chose to ignore a lot of obvious signs something wasn’t quite right here. Grandmother agreed Isabelle should leave the hospital that night, I’m pretty sure it said that both G/parents noticed her limping.
See, I do absolutely blame the grandmother. She saw Isabelle covered in bruises on several occasions and clearly unwell the day before she died. IIRC she was also with her daughter when Isabelle was taken to hospital with the broken leg and all the safeguarding concerns and kick off that followed. Add to that, the boyfriend living in the house who her daughter had only known 5 minutes (and the grandmother had never even met) while also knowing her daughter had a history of being vulnerable to domestic abuse. Surely that combination should have set every alarm bell ringing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 31

Boogs

VIP Member
I had a similar parent. My mother kicked me out when I was 15 when her latest bloke took an inappropriate shine to me. She didn't kick me out to save me from him. She kicked me out because she was jealous! Before that, I'd had years of various blokes of hers pinching my arse, offering to give me 'massages', kissing me full on the mouth etc. And she let them. We've not been in contact for decades and we never will.
I haven’t lived with her since I was 12 and I’ve been no contact for 16 years and intend to keep it that way. I see a lot of comments on here about women having that maternal instinct but sadly plenty don’t. I can feel some compassion for the child my mother was but not the selfish, manipulative, vindictive adult she will always be.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 30

nothinonyou

VIP Member
Apparently she checked the sex offenders register for him a couple of times... How about you keep him away from your baby
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 30

bigmac22

Well-known member
Today’s updates - just to warn, quite graphic in parts. Read from bottom up.

3:05pm30/06/26
Hearing ends for the day
The jury has been sent home for the day and the trial will not be sitting again until Friday due to judge and barrister commitments.

2:52pm30/06/26
Police interaction - WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT
The jurors have watched body-worn camera footage of Temporary Detective Constable Anna Liddell who attended the University Hospital of North Tees.
Mr Wright KC read out the officer's statement before the footage was played.
She says she was met by a consultant who told her that Isabelle was likely to die and was suffering injuries that were the result of trauma because she was covered in bruises.
The officer recorded that there was blood in Isabelle's nappy and in her urine - the nappy was seized and a hair was recovered from it as stored separately.
She wrote: "The doctor told me to come closer and she showed me Isabelle's body.
"I could see a large bruise on her forehead, many bruises all over her abdomen. She also pointed out bruising and swelling around her genital area.
"I noted a large bruise under her vaginal area and the doctor also pointed out bruising to her inner vaginal area."
She says she passed on this information to her supervisor before Walker and her family arrived at the hospital.
The jury hears how it was shown that Isabelle had a bleed on the brain and it was decided to transfer the two-year-old to the RVI in Newcastle.

12:35pm30/06/26
Critical care at Newcastle
Dr John Glazebrook, a consultant in Paediatric and Adult Intensive care and Anaesthesia, at Newcastle Royal Victoria Infirmary.
He says his initially assessment showed that Isabelle was unresponsive to a bright light being shone into her eyes which is a sign of extremely serious brain injury.
A CT scan of Isabelle's head was carried out which showed there was no blood flow to her brain - she had suffered an unrecoverable brain injury.
The doctor told Walker and her mother, Claire, that Isabelle was going to die and she passed away shortly after her breathing tube was removed.

12:31pm30/06/26
Hospital nurse
Mr Wright is asking her if Walker told her about her daughter's illness.
She says: "She told me she thought her boyfriend could be hurting her because of the bruises on her."
Miss Forster says Walker told her that Simpson had seen Isabelle on the morning but she offered no explanation of how she became so ill.
Nicholas Lumley KC, representing Simpson, is now cross examining the nurse.
The barrister asks her whether Walker had said anything about what happened to cause her to be in that state.
She says: "She just found her that way."
Miss Forster says Walker told her that she didn't believe Simpson could have caused the injuries.
Mark McKone KC, representing Walker, is asking the nurse questions on behalf of his client.
The nurse confirms that Walker told her that 'she was starting to think her partner' had caused the bruising to Isabelle.
12:25pm30/06/26
Hearing resumes
The hearing resumes with the next witness, Emma Forster, after a short break in proceedings.
Miss Forster is a registered nurse working in the A&E department at the University Hospital of North Tees.
She tells the court that she didn't work on Isabelle but was tasked with supporting Alexandra Walker.
Mr Wright KC asks her about her interactions with the defendant.
She says: "She told she was in hospital a week earlier with a hairline fracture."
The jury hears how Walker told the nurse that Isabelle had vomited on the day she was admitted to hospital.
Walker told her that she had put her to bed and was checking on her every ten minutes.
Miss Forster says Walker told her that 'her eyes had rolled back and looked dead' and her dad told her to call 999 and start CPR.
11:46am30/06/26
Cross examination
Nicholas Lumley KC, representing Simpson, is now cross examining the paramedic.
He asks Mrs Hunter whether she thought Walker's reaction was unusual and she agrees with the barrister.
Mark McKone KC, representing Walker, is asking the paramedic about the snigger and giggle while she was trying to find out what had happened.
When asked whether people react differently to traumatic incidents, the paramedic agreed with him.
11:40am30/06/26
Paramedic leader
The next witness to give evidence is Rebecca Hunter who is a clinical team leader paramedic for the North East Ambulance Service.
Mrs Hunter says her role on the day was to oversee the treatment of Isabelle by her colleagues.
She says she noticed the toddler had dry vomit on her face and clothing.
Mr Wright KC, prosecuting, asks the paramedic what else she noticed.
"She had extensive bruising that went down from her head to her legs," she says.
The jury hears how she spoke to Walker at the rear of her house and asked for Isabelle's details after telling her that her daughter was 'critically unwell'.
Mrs Hunter says she asked who the male was sitting in the garden and Alexandra said 'dad' and he pointed out that he was her 'dad' and not Isabelle's - which resulted in a little giggle from Alexandra.
She says she also recalled a snigger when she asked her about her surname - she says 'I recollect thinking that wasn't the reaction I was expecting but thought I didn't have time to look into that at the time'.
She says Walker told her that Isabelle had been eating and drinking as her normal in the days leading up to the illness but was a little 'agitated' at times.
"She says she (Isabelle) vomited that morning, put her down for a nap and gone back later to find her unresponsive and floppy and her eyes had rolled into the back of her head," she says.
11:28am30/06/26
Second paramedic team
Leonie Jordain, who works for the North East Ambulance Service, says she was asked to speak to Alexandra Walker to try and find out how Isabelle was presenting in the week prior to the ambulance being called.
She says she found the mother in the kitchen with a police officer and another male was sitting in the garden.
Walker told her that the toddler had suffered a fractured leg and had been in hospital for treatment.
Walker told her that Isabelle had been sick since coming out of hospital but had not been taken back for treatment.
She tells that jury that there was no mention of anyone else being involved in getting Isabelle up and about on the day she fell gravely ill.
Nicholas Lumley KC, representing Simpson, is now cross examining the paramedic.
The barrister checks the contents of her written statement and she confirms that Walker told her she had gotten her daughter up and she seemed lethargic.
11:16am30/06/26
Written evidence
The statement of Nicole Weir, who works for the North East Ambulance Service, is now being read to the jury by Mr Wright.
She says she was the driving of the ambulance and was less experienced than her colleague Sam Jones who took control of the medical treatment.
"I immediately noticed she was cold," she says.
She says the female and male both moved into the kitchen and felt their behaviour was strange - 'they never opened the door at any time to see whether we had brought the baby back to life'.
Ms Weir says the second paramedic team arrived at the scene and started sucking vomit from the baby's mouth the clear her airway before drilling into her leg bone to administer emergency drugs.
She says they managed to get her heart beating again but there was still no breathing or eye response.
11:06am30/06/26
Hospital travel
The jury hears how Isabelle's pulse became weak again as they transferred her to hospital.
She says CPR was given to the toddler until they arrived at the University Hospital of North Tees.
Ms Jones says she overheard someone in the hospital medical team say that they had spotted blood in Isabelle's nappy.
Nicholas Lumley KC, representing Simpson, is now cross examining the paramedic.
She agrees with him that it was clear that Isabelle was not breathing when she arrived at the scene and 'there was nothing going on at all'.
"She was freezing cold," she says. Mr Lumley asks if she could have been like that for some time and she agrees.
"It appears to you that she had been in this lifeless state for some time," he asks. "Yes," she replies.
The paramedic says it was clear to the eye that Isabelle had bruises to her body.
Mark McKone KC, representing Walker, is now asking the witness questions.
"How you are able to say how long Isabelle had not been breathing for before you get there," he asks.
She replies: "No, I'm not able to say."
11:00am30/06/26
Extra support
The jury hears another paramedic crew arrived at the scene and they started to apply suction to her airway and pads taking a reading from her heart.
She say 'there was a flatline - there was no electrical activity at that time'.
The paramedic says they placed a needle into Isabelle's bone in order to give immediate medical treatment to get her heart going again.
The jury hears how a senior paramedic arrived at the scene as back up to the serious incident.
"They don't get hands on, they are their to oversee and ensure things are done," she says.
Ms Jones says they were able to get Isabelle's heart beating again and eventually her pulse returned but she was still not breathing on her own.
When asked what then became the priority, she says we have to get her to hospital as quickly as possible.
Mr Wright asks the paramedic what happened in the rear of the ambulance. She says there was a discussion over whether it was medical emergency or traumatic event.
"Due to the bruising we went down the traumatic route," she says.
10:53am30/06/26
Emergency treatment
She says there was no blood moving around Isabelle's body - she was cold to the touch with vomit on her face, clothing and floor next to her.
"I have moved her head and she had a bruise in the middle of her forehead," she says.
The paramedic says she tried to clear Isabelle's airway and gave her oxygen through a tube.
The jury hears how she saw a man and a woman in the house but her focus was on the seriously ill child.
Ms Jones says her colleague asked Alexandra Walker about Isabelle's previous medical history and she was told about the break to her leg.
Dealing with other injuries, she says her colleague started CPR and noticed bruises and brought it to my attention.
"She had bruises across her abdomen and her pelvic area," she says. "I was continuing with breaths and my colleague was continuing with CPR."
10:47am30/06/26
Paramedic evidence
Today's evidence starts with paramedic Samantha Jones recounting the details of what happened when she arrived at Isabelle Welsh's Thornaby home on September 13 last year.
The court hears that the ambulance was able to get to the house in a minute after receiving the call that a two-year-old was in cardiac arrest.
Richard Wright KC, prosecuting, is taking the paramedic through her evidence.
Ms Jones says she found Isabelle laid on the floor at the bottom of the stairs.
When asked whether she thought the toddler was breathing - "By the way she looked I could tell she wasn't breathing," she says.
The paramedic checked whether she was breathing and for a pulse and found nothing while there was no reaction from her pupils when she shined a light in her eyes.
"That shows there is some sign of brain damage," she says.
She says 'she was very cold to touch and pale in colour'.
10:34am30/06/26
Evidence recap
Good morning, you can read a recap of yesterday's evidence here - Isabelle Welsh's mum Googled why toddler was bleeding before 999 call
This morning's evidence should be getting underway shortly.
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 28
Something surely had to change doesn’t it?! I’ll be physically sick if I hear another ‘lessons will be learned’ spiel after this. There has to be a law change whereby a health worker/social worker CANNOT be allowed to sign off a child with ‘no concerns’ until they’ve physically laid eyes on them for a proper assessment or they’ve had a medical examination. (Pref away from the monsters looking after them that say things like, a toybox fell on their head or they slipped when being placed into a cot)

Make it mandatory, get the police involved if necessary so the guardians/parents/carers have to comply. Too many children are slipping through the net now due to overworked and underfunded services where it’s just easier all round to take an adult’s word for it that everything is fine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
I also think because this is behind a paywall, no one’s going to read it obviously as no one’s really going to subscribe. Preston’s was not behind a paywall so everyone could read it. I did email the editor saying if it wasn’t behind a paywall it would appeal to a wider audience and he replied saying it takes a specialist journalist to attend court and write up the notes so the subscriber covers that - however if no ones subscribing.. what are they getting. I find the updates limited compared to Preston’s,
Hate to be a cynic, but teacher + ‘middle class’ whatever-he-did+ gay couple with nice house will probably brings more shock to a nation, than the two in the Isabelle case 😔
 
  • Like
Reactions: 28

Tobodee

VIP Member
I’ve put this morning’s court updates behind a spoiler - they’ll need to be read bottom to top.

It’s really long and there’s really distressing details

11:43am24/06/26
WARNING GRAPHIC DETAILS
Pathologist reports

Mr Wright says two pathologists carried out examinations of Isabelle's body after she died.
He says: "Dr Hoggard agrees with Dr Du Plessis that the cause of Isabelle’s death was a significant inflicted head injury that occurred close to the time of her terminal collapse.
"He favours a mechanism of injury in which her head was impacted with a hard and unyielding surface such as a wall or a hard floor associated with violent shaking.
"However, that head injury was not an isolated inflicted injury. Over a period of time Isabelle had been subjected to repeated assaults. Her body displayed the signs of no less than 97 soft tissue injuries."
The barrister says many of the bruises were left by someone forcefully gripping the two-year-old to her torso, face and jaw.
He says Dr Hoggard also found injuries consistent with Isabelle having been subjected to sexual assaults prior to her death.
"She had significant injuries to her anus," he says. "There was also evidence of injury to her vagina implying blunt force trauma applied externally in that area in the region of 2 to 3 days before she died.
"Isabelle had been subjected to a series of physical and sexual assaults in the days and weeks leading up to her death, culminating in a final head injury that fractured her skull and caused her heart to stop."

11:36am24/06/26
Medical examinations
The jury hears how Dr Jo McPartland, a pathologist who works in the Alder Hey Children’s hospital in Liverpool, examined Isabelle's eyes and interpreted the injuries and other signs.
He says: "Her evidence will show that in the absence of any convincing accidental cause of that severe head trauma the findings support the conclusion that Isabelle had been subjected to abusive head trauma.
"In plain language somebody had deliberately and severely assaulted her causing a massive head injury and the associated bleeding in the eyes is a product of that head injury."
While Dr Daniel Duplessis, a neuropathologist, concluded the cause of Isabelle's death was a non-accidental injury.
He says: "In other words it was inflicted deliberately in an assault. Whatever precise form that assault was in, it involved sufficient force to fracture the heard bones of the skull. But this was not a single blow.
"The totality of the findings supports the proposition that there was not just a single catastrophic blow that fractured the skull but that there was also repetitive shaking or some similar mechanism during which Isabelle’s head and spine were subject to repeated hyperextension or flexion."
The doctor concludes that the massive injury was inflicted in the hours prior to Isabelle's fatal collapse.
11:27am24/06/26
Expert evidence
Mr Wright is now turning his attention to the evidence the jury will hear from medical experts from across a range of specialist disciplines.
He says: "This will involve a number of medical experts explaining to you the examinations that they conducted of Isabelle's body after she had died, and on parts of her body, in particular her bones, her eyes and her brain.
"We understand that all of this is likely to be distressing evidence for you to engage with.
"We are sorry about that, but you will understand that it is extremely important that you understand how and why this little girl died when she did."
The barrister tells the jury that they won't have to look at photographs of the injuries instead they will be looking at computer generated body diagrams.
The jury hears how one expert will be able to age the fractures that toddler suffered towards the end of her life.
He says: "Taking the scans and his examination together it is clear that Isabelle had sustained multiple fractures to her body over a period of time.
"There were fractures to 21 separate bones, including her upper and lower limbs, her spine, and her skull. In terms of aging those fractures they can be broadly grouped together into injuries sustained close to the time of her death, injuries in the days before her death and injuries inflicted weeks before her death."

11:21am24/06/26
Criminal responsibility
Mr Wright says: "This is a case in which Isabelle was subjected to serious and repeated abuse in a household occupied by two adults and no one else.
"Whoever inflicted those injuries—and you may think there are occasions that point strongly to Harrison Simpson—those injuries were not hidden.
"They were obvious, severe, and repeated over time. And so, even if you were not sure that Harrison Simpson inflicted the fatal injury himself, the prosecution case is that he must have been aware of the risk of serious harm to Isabelle and did nothing to protect her."
11:18am24/06/26
Simpson's role
Mr Wright tells the jury that they will hear a good deal of evidence about the role Harrison Simpson in the weeks leading up to Isabelle's death.
He says: "You will see that from late August onwards, there were repeated occasions on which Harrison Simpson was left alone with Isabelle.
"Those were not isolated or fleeting moments. They were regular features of life in that house. And on those occasions, the evidence consistently shows that Isabelle was either already injured, became distressed, or deteriorated.
"On August 20, the first occasion on which he was left alone with her, what followed is evidence suggesting that Isabelle was complaining of pain to her leg—an injury which was later be found to be a fracture."
He continues: "On September10, when Isabelle was left in his sole care, a bang can be heard on the CCTV followed by her crying. Later that day, she remained in distress and complaining of pain.
"On the morning of September 13, the day she suffered the injury from which she died, Harrison Simpson was again in the house and, for a period, was in sole charge of Isabelle.
"He reported that she had gone to sleep. From that point onwards, there is no meaningful sign of her, no clear evidence of her being up, moving or behaving as a well child might.
"The medical evidence, you will hear, indicates that the fatal head injury was inflicted shortly before her collapse. That is an important matter for you to consider alongside the evidence of who had care of Isabelle during that period."
11:14am24/06/26
Critically ill
Mr Wright says: "The evidence will show that Alexandra Walker was in the house while Isabelle was in a visibly poor condition. She was aware that her daughter was unwell.
"She discussed it with others. She observed it directly. And then, when Isabelle became critically ill—when, on any account, she was gravely unwell—Alexandra Walker did not immediately call for help.
"Instead, she searched the internet. She spoke to others. She delayed. It was only when her stepfather arrived and instructed her to do so that a 999 call was finally made."
He adds: "Standing alone, that evidence provides a powerful basis from which you may conclude that Alexandra Walker was directly responsible for at least some of the injuries that Isabelle suffered.
"But again, the prosecution case does not require you to conclude that she acted alone. This is a case in which Isabelle was subjected to sustained and serious abuse in the care of two adults in the same household."
11:11am24/06/26
Background details
Mr Wright is telling the jury that Walker was the primary carer for Isabelle.
He says: "She was present in the house throughout the period in which Isabelle sustained the injuries that we now know she had suffered - injuries that were numerous, serious, and in many cases obvious.
"You will hear that over a period of weeks, Isabelle sustained multiple fractures, extensive bruising, and injuries of a kind that could not have been missed by any attentive or caring parent.
"These were not subtle signs. This was a small child in visible pain, crying, unsettled, and deteriorating over time. And yet, despite that, Alexandra Walker did not seek timely medical assistance.
"When Isabelle sustained the injury to her leg, there was a delay of days before medical help was sought, despite the fact that the child was plainly in pain and unable to walk properly."
He reminds the jury that the prosecution case is that Walker became defensive, aggressive, and resistant to the involvement of medical professionals when Isabelle suffered her broken leg.
10:46am24/06/26
Police interviews
Mr Wright says : "In later interviews Walker turned her attention to Simpson. She said that if the broken leg was caused by anyone it was caused by him. She said that she now realised that he had been abusing Isabelle.
"Having accused him of being responsible she then declined to answer questions in the remainder of the interviews."
Turning to Simpson's police interview, he says: "He was provided his own similar opportunity to answer questions and provide his own account of what happened.
"He did not take it and made no comment throughout the extensive interview process."
Dealing with what happened after the police interview, he says: "They both knew exactly what had happened to Isabelle because in the weeks before her death they had each subjected her to violence culminating in the infliction of that terrible, fatal head injury.
"It would have been, we will invite you to conclude, perfectly obvious to both Walker and Simpson that Isabelle was being seriously assaulted on a regular basis.
"The failure to take her to hospital for five days after her leg had been broken and the significant delay in calling 999 on the 13th is in and of itself evidence of the fact that both were responsible for and aware of a series of violent assaults that they wanted to keep away from medical scrutiny if at all possible."
10:40am24/06/26
Police investigation
Both defendants were arrested and interviewed by the police in the days following Isabelle’s death.
Mr Wright says Walker provided an account of September 13 claiming that Isabelle got up and had breakfast but was then sick.
During the interview, she said: "Simpson looked after her whilst Walker got a shower but she did not believe that he had harmed her.
"Isabelle was her normal self and at 11 or thereabouts she put her to bed for a nap. She checked on her during her nap and saw that she was tossing and turning. Simpson went to visit a friend and at 3 in the afternoon Walker got Isabelle out of bed.
"She claimed that she had noticed some bruises on her back and saw that she had a fresh bruise after Walker had her shower. Isabelle had a bruise on head and Walker denied that any bruises had anything to do with her."
Walker told police that there was nothing on Isabelle’s body to warn her about anything on September13.
Mr Wright says: "But then said that she had noticed bruising on her stomach when she had put her down for her nap. She saw the fingerprints and was in shock.
"She also noticed other bruises to Isabelle’s face and so challenged Simpson but he denied having caused them saying that he loved Isabelle and would never hurt her."
10:32am24/06/26
Fatal injury
Mr Wright says: "Suffice to say at this stage that Walker expressed herself as shocked by the sudden decline in Isabelle’s health and denied being responsible for inflicting any injury upon her.
"She did however again implicate HS as potentially being responsible for the infliction of injury upon her daughter.
"Sadly, despite the very best efforts of the emergency medical teams who treated her, Isabelle was found to have sustained a massive and unsurvivable head injury and died at 2:48 in the morning of September 14."
The barrister adds: "Her body was observed to be covered in bruises, she had bruising to her vagina and in the area of her anus and her nappy contained blood, scans of her body undertaken in hospital also revealed multiple fractures to her bones, not just the leg fracture that had been observed in hospital on September 2."
The jury there was a series of messages between Walker and Simpson where she tells him Isabelle has had a heart attack and told him not to come to her home as it was a 'crime scene'.
10:30am24/06/26
Emergency treatment
Paramedics noticed bruising to Isabelle’s abdomen and an obvious bump in the middle of her forehead, her nappy was noted to have blood in it.
Walker told the paramedics that her daughter had not been well since she was in hospital.
He says: "She claimed that when Isabelle was noted to be lethargic and unresponsive she then decided to call 999."
Once at the hospital, Walker said that she had called 999 when Isabelle’s eyes had rolled back in her head and she thought that she was dead.
She said that she didn’t know what had happened but that she thought her partner HS might have done something to her because Isabelle had a lot of unexplained bruises.
She said that her partner was there on Thursdays and had been at the house on the morning of the collapse, but then said she didn’t think that he would do anything.
10:27am24/06/26
Dying child
Mr Wright says it took Walker an hour to call her stepfather but she still failed to call for medical assistance despite her concerns.
He says Walker then took the bong out of her house and placed it next to the bin.
When her stepfather, Dan Ackroyd, arrives at 4.14pm he immediately tells her to call 999. "The shows how gravely unwell Isabelle was," he says.
Walker can be heard repeatedly saying Isabelle as she tries to rouse her when she calls emergency services.
"The child is not breathing, she is clearly not well," he says.
"There was very significant delay in summoning the emergency services. One explanation of course is that Walker knew that this time she would not be able to bluff and bluster her way out of the very difficult questions that she knew she would be asked by paramedics and at hospital.
"On arrival they noticed that the house was tidy and Isabelle was lying on her back at the foot of the stairs.
"She was unresponsive, had no pulse, was cold to the touch. Orange vomit could be seen on her face and on the carpet in the area where she was laying.
"Walker told the paramedics that Isabelle had been sick and described the vomit as being like acid. She added “I put her down for a sleep and when I went to wake her up, she was like this”."

10:19am24/06/26
Seriously ill
Mr Wright says Isabelle is still in bed at around 3pm when Walker pops out to the shop and she says to Simpson that she will wake her daughter up when she returns.
Shortly after 3pm, Simpson leaves the house and Mr Wright says that will be the last time that they see him that day.
"Within ten minutes of Simpson leaving the house, Walker googled ‘why would my toddler be bleeding’. A minute later the CCTV picks up her saying ‘You’re scaring me’.
"She then googles ‘what should I do if my child has blood in his stool’.
"A cartoon can be heard in the background, she can be heard saying ‘come on’ and repeating Isabelle’s name."
She then googles 'lethargic meaning'. He says: "It is absolutely obvious we suggest that by this time Isabelle is gravely ill. She is quite simply dying.
"Despite those searches and the declaration that she is scaring her - Walker does nothing, she is having a cigarette in a kitchen - not calling emergency services."
10:11am24/06/26
Fateful day
Mr Wright says Simpson sends a series of messages to a friend saying that he is up with Isabelle while her mother continues to sleep.
He says there was no sign of the toddler on the CCTV in the house throughout the morning and Simpson tells Walker that he has put her down to go to sleep.
Simpson is smoking his bong as lunchtime approaches while Walker has got out of bed after drinking ten pints of Stella the night before.
"It's clear that Isabelle is not downstairs with them," he says.
Shortly before 1pm, the toddler is still asleep and Simpson and Walker talk about how they expect her to be when she wakes up.
Around 30 minutes later, Walker is on the phone to her stepfather discussing how she is doing.
9:59am24/06/26
Opening continues
Richard Wright KC, prosecuting, will continue with his opening speech this morning but the evidence begins.
The barrister will describing the events on the day Isabelle suffered her fatal head injury on September 13 last year.
He tells the jury that Walker was having a slow start to the day due to her drinking and late night whereas Simpson is up and about early while in sole care of the two-year-old.
Claire Walker sends multiple messages to her daughter but doesn't get any response as she was 'sleeping off' the night before, he says
 
  • Sad
  • Angry
  • Wow
Reactions: 28

LittleMy

VIP Member
It’s also extremely draining emotionally to follow these trials and I think some people have to prioritise their own mental wellbeing. I’ve followed a lot on here over the years - Star, Arthur, Logan, the Letby trial, Sara, Preston and now little Isabelle. Reading about what was done to all of these poor children is devastating especially as a parent yourself with children a similar age to some. 💔
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 26

flap a doodle dandy

Chatty Member
Someone asked why this case isn’t getting as much attention as Preston Davey’s. Personally I couldn’t bring myself to read the updates to begin with, as listening to Preston’s was hard enough. However I’ve just been reading through the updates on here (thanks to the poster who puts them on here, saves having to try and bypass the paywall) and I feel genuinely sick. I can’t even begin to comprehend what Isabelle went through. I really cannot find the words, it’s beyond heartbreaking.

And the worst thing is, after this trial is done and justice has been served, it’ll be on to the next. And the next. And the next. It just keeps happening and apparently the people who should learn from it don’t learn a thing 💔
I know there is another case coming up soon at Warwick court of a 1 year old girl with the charges being murder, cruelty, neglect, and sexual assault by penetration. I think both biological parents are charged with the father also being charged with possessing indecent images. There seem to be multiple cases now all all at once with pretty much similar charges.
 
  • Angry
  • Sad
  • Like
Reactions: 26
5.30pm AW’s mother and stepfather arrived at the Hartington Close property to drop off the requested shopping and alcohol. Her mother Claire later stated it had become too upsetting to see her granddaughter in that deteriorating condition
This just defies belief. Too upsetting for her?? How the fuck did she think it was for Isabelle then?

I cannot envisage a scenario where I could see a baby in this state and not somehow find a way to remove her from the situation.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 26

flap a doodle dandy

Chatty Member
The above sounds like it was the mother that caused Isabelle’s fatal head injury.
How cold do you have to be to call your two year old a Cnut when she is in pain from an untreated broken leg :mad:
And then the Nan pops round with ten cans of Stella and says it’s too upsetting to see her granddaughter deteriorating :mad:
Not to mention AW stabbing herself and smashing up the kitchen.
This poor little girl was in a horrible and abusive home situation even without the scummy boyfriend moving in and SA her :cry:
How have the grandparents not been charged with allowing the death of a child ? It was so 'upsetting' they didn't get her medical help.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
  • Sick
Reactions: 26