I think it's so much easier to preach socialism when you have no need at all to depend on the State. I have noticed this recently as a trend - my richest friends enjoy showing off their left-leaning creds from the safety of their large houses filled with privately educated children.
And she is in no way a Tory! You obvs know a fair bit about Joyce - more than me at any rate - but if you looked at her Twitter it is and always has been pretty left wing.
Anyway I don't want an argument about this awful woman or her dodgy man, it's too hot.
We all depend on the state in countless ways though, including rich people who send their kids to private schools (even if some wouldn't like to admit it). I'm not sure why it's easier for them than less wealthy people to preach socialism?
I only have passing knowledge of EJ from recent news articles, and IK recently deleted all her tweets so I have no idea of how left wing they were. All I really know of her is that she's a Sunday Times columnist (doesn't scream left wing) and opposed Scottish independence.
I thought it was just a discussion, not an argument; I picked up on the term "champagne socialist" because it's a term I don't agree with, but appreciate that it can also be used to describe fake socialists - I was just curious as to what made IK a fake socialist, because I'm not familiar enough with her output, and I don't think living in a big house qualifies her.