“Whatever happened” not what that awful man did . She’s awfu tooYou are quite right.
This was it.
As long as she was fine though
View attachment 3828249
And yes there were notable a lickers. Suzanne Moore said they should go for lunch and Marian Keyes said she was 'the goodest of good eggs'
India Knight #2
- Start date
-
- Tags
- India Knight Threads
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Woman in Customs claim breaks down: Lady Foster recalls 'humiliating'
LADY FOSTER broke down in tears yesterday while being cross-examined about her High Court damages claim over the 'public humiliation' she claims to have suffered at the hands of Customs officers at Heathrow airport.
From 1993. She’s always been an awful woman.
I think there might be more sympathy for India had she not always been so sneering and “I know better than you” in her writing and her mean girl attitude on social media
She’s a talent-free nepo baby
I think that's true of so many journalists from her generation. The fact she has a beauty column is beyond laughable even without everything else
Wow so she learnt how to be a witch from her mother.Woman in Customs claim breaks down: Lady Foster recalls 'humiliating'
LADY FOSTER broke down in tears yesterday while being cross-examined about her High Court damages claim over the 'public humiliation' she claims to have suffered at the hands of Customs officers at Heathrow airport.www.independent.co.uk
From 1993. She’s always been an awful woman.
I think there might be more sympathy for India had she not always been so sneering and “I know better than you” in her writing and her mean girl attitude on social media
Burchill went to town on India after that tweetYou are quite right.
This was it.
As long as she was fine though
View attachment 3828249
And yes there were notable a lickers. Suzanne Moore said they should go for lunch and Marian Keyes said she was 'the goodest of good eggs'
“I’m not for a woman carrying the can for what her man does. But Knight’s lack of acknowledgement is breathtaking”
Also the amusing “Langmead ended their marriage when he turned gay, for which no one can blame him”
The silence of the hacks
Why has the press said so little about the Eric Joyce child porn case?
web.archive.org
I would TW that it gets quite graphicBurchill went to town on India after that tweet
“I’m not for a woman carrying the can for what her man does. But Knight’s lack of acknowledgement is breathtaking”
Also the amusing “Langmead ended their marriage when he turned gay, for which no one can blame him”
The silence of the hacks
Why has the press said so little about the Eric Joyce child porn case?web.archive.org
Also, this 2000 profile on India by Lynn Barber is deliciously revealing for anyone who hasn’t previously seen it. Even with how much Lynn likes India, the results speak for themselves
Last edited:
Christ she’s a boorish idiot
India Knight has done wrong, even aside from putting a paedophile before her child she has stood by a paedophile. Yes, she's not been convicted of accessing and creating untold number of CSA materials but she has stood by a man that did. If you can call him a man. She has chosen to stand by a man who is a convicted paedophile, she is a woman of means, she is in no way reliant on this worm yet she's chosen to stand by him, knowing what he's done. It's not guilt by association, it's guilt by what she's willing to overlook. She has no morals, the woman is no better than he is, she's a worm too
She had already stood by him, with his unprovoked attack beating up teenagers in a drunken rage.
"It was horrible for it to become public" says it all.You are quite right.
This was it.
As long as she was fine though
View attachment 3828249
And yes there were notable a lickers. Suzanne Moore said they should go for lunch and Marian Keyes said she was 'the goodest of good eggs'
There was a Guardian article recently from a married couple in India’s and Eric’s shoes.
Absolutely breathtaking to see that tone-deaf victim mentality laid bare - ‘it was awful that we had to sell our dream home / use foodbanks / tell our parents / change our name’ etc. The wife even works in a safeguarding role with children. The husband says ‘suddenly going from being a person to a criminal was a shock’ and ‘you’re not a bad person, you’ve just made bad decisions’. Unfathomable.
Absolutely breathtaking to see that tone-deaf victim mentality laid bare - ‘it was awful that we had to sell our dream home / use foodbanks / tell our parents / change our name’ etc. The wife even works in a safeguarding role with children. The husband says ‘suddenly going from being a person to a criminal was a shock’ and ‘you’re not a bad person, you’ve just made bad decisions’. Unfathomable.
"I told myself the decision to stay could always be changed – if something else happened or it wasn’t working, we could separate. There was nothing to lose."
Apart from her children's safety? Her own dignity? Her peace of mind?
She mentions having a video alarm in their son's room, which is mind boggling. So she's acknowledging her husband is a risk to her own child? And yet she stays.
How much of a doormat are these women? The relationship must be rotting from the centre, and yet India's twittering about having house guests? Imagine being such a guest. You wouldn't want to use their wifi or devices, you wouldn't leave your phone where he could access it (like having booze in your bag with an alcoholic around). Anything she said to suggest they had a lovely life or she was so happy, you'd be thinking, but your husband likes to watch children being grape? Surely you'd find yourself thinking, why are these people my friends - 6 billion on the planet and these are the people I'm choosing to spend time with?
We had to change the ringtone on our doorbell. FFS.
If India wasn’t a newspaper columnist/author, and she was some Head of Dept at work you’d avoid her like the plague, and that’s before finding out who she Co-habits with
I am always aghast at how India has cruised along almost untouched by this scandal.
About the only people to be always aware of it is Tattle and Julie Burchill. It's like it's almost distasteful to mention it as though poor India is a victim. Well up to a point - who knows what he's like with her (probably leaves her well alone tbh) - but she has the money and contacts to be able to leave him. She doesn't. So the conclusion is she loves him. A p*edophile.
In fairness, who does know what he’s like with her, if he batters unsuspecting teenagers up the shops when he’s pissed.
Yeh I'd have had no idea about it if it weren't for tattle. Me and my mum.both read the times magazines at weekends (neither of us have ever liked Indias columns anyway) but my mum was horrified when I told her about the whole things, she'd had no idea
I think I’d feel a bit more sorry for her if she hadn’t threatened to sic her pedalo husband on Tattlers after Sali Hughes threw a tantrum about her thread on here.
She stopped being a victim when she stayed with him and brazened it out imo. As you say, this is a woman with the means and money and connections to get shut of him, but she didn’t. Shes either desperate or thick and my money is on a bit of both.