Still there for me.
What did it say?That top comment is so refreshing to read. Everyone is so far up India’s backside on Substack. Finally someone said it.
That’s it, isn’t it- the line. This isn’t some woman who was completely financially and emotionally dependent on one horrible, manipulative man, Knight had choices here and the choice she made to stay with Joyce, crossed most people’s line.
Christ on a bike.I think the key issue is that her relationship with him was used in mitigation at his trial. She colluded in his avoiding a prison sentence.
Precisely. At the trial she wasn't an innocent hapless bystander - she played an active role in the scumbag staying free.I think the key issue is that her relationship with him was used in mitigation at his trial. She colluded in his avoiding a prison sentence.
And basically abandoning her daughter in the process tooThat’s it, isn’t it- the line. This isn’t some woman who was completely financially and emotionally dependent on one horrible, manipulative man, Knight had choices here and the choice she made to stay with Joyce, crossed most people’s line.
The fact that she's so flippant about it "onwards" I'm sure the victims won't have been able to recover so easily will they. Just vilePrecisely. At the trial she wasn't an innocent hapless bystander - she played an active role in the scumbag staying free.
I'll try to find the tweet she sent around the time. Self pitying drivel thanking all the friends who'd stood by them for the two years it had been in the works. All about the horrendous time she'd had. Not one hint of shame or contrition or understanding the revolting crimes he had committed and the victims.
ETA found it
Yes the 'I'm alright Jack' attitude was incredibly jarring. I think a few people called her out on it - Suzanne Moore springs to mind.The fact that she's so flippant about it "onwards" I'm sure the victims won't have been able to recover so easily will they. Just vile
How can you be so disgustingly nonchalant about being with a dirty, creepy, nasty paedophile? I can think of a hundred reasons you should be ashamed of staying with someone who pleaded guilty to partaking in child sexual exploitation. It's bleeping evilPrecisely. At the trial she wasn't an innocent hapless bystander - she played an active role in the scumbag staying free.
I'll try to find the tweet she sent around the time. Self pitying drivel thanking all the friends who'd stood by them for the two years it had been in the works. All about the horrendous time she'd had. Not one hint of shame or contrition or understanding the revolting crimes he had committed and the victims.
ETA found it
Yeah, and it's not all about her either! No word about the victims? It's gross. I don't think this is simply a case of guilt by association. Her attitude and the choice she made to defend a predator - that's why she's being judged.'I am fine... Onwards'
She is absolutely bleeping disgusting.