Hope Hazno can find his way to the panic roomI LOVE this bit... "There’s a lot going on in the world - let’s focus on that rather than creating clickbait."
That’s a bit rich considering how insular they were when they were flaunting themselves to the point of being obnoxious last year, jumping on every hip cause making sure they weren’t forgotten. The constant stream of PR puff pieces for “clickbait”, self indulgent op-eds and launching attacks on people left right and centre via that tacky book... all during the height of a worldwide pandemic.
She’s spat her dummy out again, just like the childish spoilt woman she is.
Um didn't the MoS suggest they would make a donation to Invictus in their original apology piece, so he's kind of been bounced into giving it to Invictus? Otherwise I'm quite sure it would have ended up wherever Disney's elephant donation has ended up?Harry thought his apology from the Mail wasn't prominent enough (Diddums!) and wanted to let us know that he, Prince Harry, was donating the agreed settlement payment to Invictus personally and all by himself, not those nasty people from the Mail
Agree, they've tied themselves in knots with fraud from the start and knee-jerk lies about everything. Like the court case perjury, there are more lies to cover previous lies because they can't remember the lies they told in the first place.They should have been plainly honest about all this birth stuff, and saved themselves the inquisition. I get the feeling she is always running scared because of her inability to tell the truth. What a life aye!!
I really do wish she's let him have his meds back. He looks on the edgeAgree, they've tied themselves in knots with fraud from the start and knee-jerk lies about everything. Like the court case perjury, there are more lies to cover previous lies because they can't remember the lies they told in the first place.
Everything they touch is destroyed. Because of their megalomania and insanity their son (if he exists) has been the subject of endless jokes and speculation from birth. Archie is just another PR tool for them.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, the proud father shamelessly uses Archie to plug dodgy Travalyst. He bleats that he fears for his son's future and paints an apocalyptic picture of devastation because of climate change. Only Travalyst can reimagine and reset the forests with impactful paradigms, so click here peasants...
The only danger to Archie is from his parents and the only "destructive and high-density human activity" that Archie suffers is from their toxic waste.
He really is a prophet of doom, a Jeremiah with his orange fuzz, sour expression and piggy eyes. No optimism and no hope, we all may as well just dig a hole and crawl in.....
Ooh that's too good to missSo if the dementor of montecito has spoken to the Telegraph and other media to say "wasn't me, it was the palace wot dunnit", then she could have taken five seconds to finish the sentence and explain why it was changed. She must surely know why it was changed or why the palace told them to change it.
But no it suits her agenda of casting the palace in a bad light to let the confusion reign.
I favour the simple explanation that BP said it must be corrected to insert the missing Prince into Haznoballs' entry, and she decided to take the opportunity to glam up her entry and remove her first names.
Hazza just couldn't stand the Mail saying the Invictus donation came from them, could he? Its hilarious how thin-skinned he is...Um didn't the MoS suggest they would make a donation to Invictus in their original apology piece, so he's kind of been bounced into giving it to Invictus? Otherwise I'm quite sure it would have ended up wherever Disney's elephant donation has ended up?
Anyway "actions speak louder than words" so I presume we'll be seeing Hazno doing lots and lots for his beloved military friends "real soon now" then? I'd laugh if in a year's time the MoS says "nope he's still done nothing". (and no another staged cemetery pap walk won't cut it). Suspect the truth remains that the military want nothing to do with the deserter.
You've only got to compare the spiv PR shark Ken Sunshine of Bumshine Sacs to Sir Christopher Geidt... Geidt is old school, foxy, ruthless .... my kinda guySpot on. The palace will outfox them because it's their game, they invented it. Hazno couldn't understand the rules so he needs Mummy MeAgain to explain them to him, and she didn't bother to read them.
I doubt she would be able to appeal, as if he rules against a summary judgment because there is more evidence to be heard this cannot be disputed. I recall that Hizzoner Warby didn't take kindly to a previous delaying tactic wasting court time, and she's already missed deadlines to come up with messages etc. I bet his patience with her will be thin.Regarding the summary judgement, if Warby rules a trial should go ahead, is his decision final or does Smeggy have the ability to appeal and drag things out further still? I have found evidence of a summary judgement being granted and then appealed, but can the claimant appeal if the judge decides the matter can only be decided by going to trial?
I noticed that too. I generally find that anyone who feels the need to state their religion in their Twitter bio is a fundamentalist nut and completely
'Odd-toed ungulate' though. Got to be Smeggy herself, choosing her moniker in a rare moment of clear-sightednessHazza just couldn't stand the Mail saying the Invictus donation came from them, could he? Its hilarious how thin-skinned he is...
He's not actually doing anything meaningful for the military. Sorry but donating a few packed lunches and a zoom chat or three doesn't add up to much.
On the birth certificate, one of Megzy's DM comment accounts posted this morning
Odd-toed Ungulate is sounding a lot like stroppy Omoid this morning.... Oh and 'George Zadie' is their offensive way of referring to Lady C. Very personal attack.
Welcome, M'am. We are very excited to have you aboard and you are among friends here. Since we've got you trapped between corgi dog @Pom Bear with VERY big teeth and ARMED warrior hamster @Scotch Mist , may we ask that you remove all titles and patronage from these two fraudsters? No pressure Your Majesty....Oh my has Brenda bought the book
Lilibet was the name her sister called her
growing up— Princess Margaret was “Margot," and the Queen was “Lilibet.” Princess Margaret
Hi Your Majesty
Welcome to Tattle
Pull up a chair and join us
We don’t bite well Pom might if you don’t share your biscuits
But they kept the last name. But the "wasn't me" BS story in the DM is getting shot down left and right since Kate has her full name in all three certificates for her children. Personally - I am starting to think she was pregnant but wore prosthetics for the cameras because she wasn't pregnant "enough" or fast enough to get the whole fawning by the public/the RF/her husband/the press that she thought she would be getting from just marrying Ginge. She just upped the visuals, possibly while still popping the Adderall, starving herself (and hazno), topping it all off with coke so she could stay as slim as possible.I think they corrected an error on the original certificate, the one that Harry approved which named Rachel Meghan as the mother, when legally the gestational carrier/surrogate should have been named. That one was given to the press in May.
Two weeks later, the changed certificate has a title for the mother but no name. I'm seriously wondering if the surrogate changed her name legally to Duchess of Sussex. This June certificate has been a secret until now. Or until Harry gave a speech attacking the Murdoch press, anyway... Richard Eden of the Mail absolutely knows all about this.
right there with you - spent the weekend making and ingesting watercress soup. Unlike Harry, we cannot get someone else to do that for the credit!Can I just say re Harry's commitment to the military?
I'm fully committed to losing weight, but it's hard work, takes time, dedication and mental grit, and it's not happening for me either.
There is a bunion though... on the right footIsn't she vegetarian though? So it can't be her" Roasting a chicken" notwithstanding
Fergie's a much nicer woman and outclasses minge. OK she's had her toes worshipped by her financial adviser, tried to sell access to Andy and sold budgie stories but apart from that not much. At least she wasn't a paid ho who trawled for husbands with her minge until a halfwitted grouper got snagged in her huge fishing net.I just found this delicious comment:
'Markle wanted to be Diana 2.0; she has in fact become Fergie 2.0"
How true, married to the spare and an embarrassment
No pragmatic management of the press like Diana did and William and Catherine do. The press had to be subservient and worship them ... Or else .....It doesn't work like that in a democracy. If they want servile press coverage go somewhere like North Korea.I LOVE this bit... "There’s a lot going on in the world - let’s focus on that rather than creating clickbait."
That’s a bit rich considering how insular they were when they were flaunting themselves to the point of being obnoxious last year, jumping on every hip cause making sure they weren’t forgotten. The constant stream of PR puff pieces for “clickbait”, self indulgent op-eds and launching attacks on people left right and centre via that tacky book... all during the height of a worldwide pandemic.
She’s spat her dummy out again, just like the childish spoilt woman she is.
That you minge under cover ?? yoo-hoo sugar !!Hazza just couldn't stand the Mail saying the Invictus donation came from them, could he? Its hilarious how thin-skinned he is...
He's not actually doing anything meaningful for the military. Sorry but donating a few packed lunches and a zoom chat or three doesn't add up to much.
On the birth certificate, one of Megzy's DM comment accounts posted this morning
Odd-toed Ungulate is sounding a lot like stroppy Omoid this morning.... Oh and 'George Zadie' is their offensive way of referring to Lady C. Very personal attack.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?