Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Elainne

Well-known member
At least she isn't wearing a ski suit 😂

I was thinking that she's got some sort of Tony Stark-style VR stuff going on - convincing herself that she's in the opposite weather.

Narcotics could have the same effect though, right? Narcs for the narc, psychotropics for the psycho 😂


I'm sorry if the terms offend anyone. The word play just fit 🤷
Sweets for my sweet, sugar for my honey.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 23

Innocent Hamster

Chatty Member
I keep wondering. If the kids actually don't exist as people say, at least not in the capacity H&M claim them to exist, how far along do they think they can keep the charade? Children grow up, they aren't cartoon characters. They become teens and adults, they eventually venture out into the world. If they lied about the births, what were they thinking? Did they assume in a decade or two they would be forgotten about so nobody would ask? Or would they fabricate new stories?
BIB - this has been their problem all along, they really don't think long-term, they're all about the instant gratification.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22

PurvyPanda

VIP Member
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 22

Rory

VIP Member
I personally think Anne 'had a fall', all this stuff about a horse is a smoke-screen. I mean, A horse might have been involved somehow, but I think there is more to it. Worrying times.
I so agree with you - was discussing this with others today. The earlier press/media reports I saw (Aust) stated “she was found” and words to the effect of “couldn’t assist herself”. It was described like she was out in the fields - not in a stable or riding paddock. I was so puzzled I asked other people what they heard said (whilst watching it). I wasn’t sure if the reporters were using their own words - rather than official statements being reported. I’m wondering if it was a small stroke or a fall/fainting in a stable and hit the cobblestones/walls.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 22

Shade. And you?

Well-known member
Lost Beyond Pluto

Giving some good commentary as per the usual. "Why The Royals Must Never Forgive Meghan Markle" :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22

TheMiceInTheShed

VIP Member
The deleted emails were between 2021 and 2023, and it's reported that all documents and drafts of Spare were destroyed in these two years - seemingly before Spare was published in 2023.
The emails between Keeper of The Privy Purse & Treasurer to the King Sir Michael Stevens, and Chuck's Private Secretary Sir Clive Alderton logically involve money and KC directly, and rather than being "dragged in" they're in the thick of it imo.

The Newspaper's lawyers are also seeking a search of 36,000 messages between Harald and Palace staff. The judge has ordered Harald's lawyers to write to Alderton and Stevens asking them to disclose any correspondence with the Duke. They will get nothing.

What were Alderton, Stevens, Moehringer and Harald negotiating over Spare for two years, and for how much? Funny sort of grey-rocking, thousands of emails. I bet the Stoat was being paid to keep damaging topics out of Spare like Diana, Savile and Camilla, whether true or not, submitting drafts to the Palace for editing and rejection. Harald has said he has plenty more material, and this missing information could be it. The Ho will be involved here and likely have copies. The Sussexes could even have leaked this, and I don't see the connection with the earlier phone-hacking case.

I bet also the Stoat was paid to destroy the correspondence and drafts, and though copies will exist in the Palace no judge will get to them. The two devices mysteriously "found" will have been cleaned up, that's why they were "found".

"Harry's barrister David Sherborne confirmed the 'entire chat history was wiped' but said: 'This was a highly necessary process, not to hide anything but to delete highly sensitive information about [Harry] and the royal family which, if leaked, would not only compromise his security but also be potentially damaging to the [duke] and his family."

There we have it. Damaging information, but not about security imo.

Wikipedia
The Privy Purse is the British sovereign's private income, mostly from the Duchy of Lancaster. This amounted to £20.1 million in net income for the year to ...
And not penny taxed, as I understand it. 😡
 
  • Angry
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 22