ahahahhahahaBeckhams picked a side
King Charles met Beckham privately while Prince Harry was in Britain
The revelation that the King met the former England captain while his son was home and attending an event two miles from Buckingham Palace may widen their rift further.www.dailymail.co.uk
2018 you say ..... so was this dress purchased in her ‘royal days’ and paid for by the then Prince Charles ( as we know he paid for all her clothes back then) but she was ordered not to wear it as it was not suitable attire for a royal?So the naked dress was in a colour apparently discontinued in 2018.
The polo outfit was apparently borrowed from Abigail Spencer.
And the Great She Ostrich is hitching up with all the multilevel marketing schemes dumb enough to include her.
Hmmm...
Or she asked the creator for a freebie and they sent her old stock.2018 you say ..... so was this dress purchased in her ‘royal days’ and paid for by the then Prince Charles ( as we know he paid for all her clothes back then) but she was ordered not to wear it as it was not suitable attire for a royal?
Imagine her flouncing about in it when it arrived thinking she was the bees knees and then fuming when told she couldn’t wear it. I can see her thinking “I’ll take this when I leave and wear it to some special occasion when all eyes will be on me and everyone will love it. That will show them that they can’t tell me what to wear.”
Afterthought from yesterday ...... “Well at least it covered my ostrich legs and horrible feet.”
I don't want to defend him, but could it be a rehab ward, rather than a medical hospital ward?Once you notice the lack of hospital equipment you can’t unsee it. Agree it’s staged and this tour has precious little to do with Invictus. The Invictus board have to stop these two from using Invictus in this way. It’s a massive platform for their vanity project.
I was thinking more along the lines of running out of money...2018 you say ..... so was this dress purchased in her ‘royal days’ and paid for by the then Prince Charles ( as we know he paid for all her clothes back then) but she was ordered not to wear it as it was not suitable attire for a royal?
Imagine her flouncing about in it when it arrived thinking she was the bees knees and then fuming when told she couldn’t wear it. I can see her thinking “I’ll take this when I leave and wear it to some special occasion when all eyes will be on me and everyone will love it. That will show them that they can’t tell me what to wear.”
Afterthought from yesterday ...... “Well at least it covered my ostrich legs and horrible feet.”
I posted a comment in a couple of the articles in the Mail saying that I was looking forward to the wall to wall coverage of William's Royal engagements etc and the comments seem to have disappeared!I wonder if the press were getting back at William a little yesterday by making the gruesome twosome all the headlines and overshadowing his trip to Cornwall.... they must be furious that they're no longer playing ball with releasing photographs ahead of time (and rightly so, who can blame them).
You compare the reception of the Harkles at that school with William's visit to a British school a few weeks ago and you get the difference between royalty and Hollywood trash.
Wearing a tasteless backless dress in faded apricotAnd don't forget, " you walked into the party like were walking onto a yacht."
"Your dress it was apricotAnd don't forget, " you walked into the party like were walking onto a yacht."
And stinky Meg she dreamed she’d be wills partner she’d be wills partner"Your dress it was apricot
You had one eye in the mirror, as you watched yourself gavotte..."
OT and PT are quite involved and there would usually be equipment for mobility/sight loss/hearing loss etc around.I don't want to defend him, but could it be a rehab ward, rather than a medical hospital ward?
The Harkles bring nothing to the party other than to be mocked and laughed at. They’re pretty stupid , not attractive to look at and aren’t capable of doing anything well, they’re a joke.The papers think William is boring and won't get the clicks so they don't cover him or Ed and Soph as much as the horrid Harkles.
I think he would get clicks if they would only do more articles on him.
Same with Ed and Soph.
The Press could do much better.
Why not give us some positive stuff?
They just want dirty laundry.
I despise him , the way he spoke to the one man was nothing short of revolting.This has actually made me quite angry. The abuse of power / position is quite astonishing
It isn't a natural photo, taken during a visit. It is a photoshoot to get the "money shot". Disgusting.
View attachment 2928650
I make sure I click on articles about the Royals, and archive the Harkle articles, apart from when I need to download videos and photos.The papers think William is boring and won't get the clicks so they don't cover him or Ed and Soph as much as the horrid Harkles.
I think he would get clicks if they would only do more articles on him.
Same with Ed and Soph.
The Press could do much better.
Why not give us some positive stuff?
They just want dirty laundry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?