Let us ponder, futile I know:
1.It is acceptable to inform the world, and enemies , and everyone in between about a military helicopter donation.
It is acceptable to name the pilots in a context which is unrelated to their service, in a situation where the ''optics'' are ''regime change'' and interventionism .
So the MOD then wonders why nobody joins.
2.It is acceptable for the Palace/Government to leak information about someone's security detail, and acceptable for the media to spin this as they wish.
3. Next stage, the Andrew Lownie's of this world and the rest of the media and people not using logic.
Andrew Lownie should prove his point... about ''exceptional'' rather than normal confidentiality which was given to Andrew by writing about the Duke of Kent as the previous Envoy .
Btw.
How would Lownie and the tabloids and their worshipers explain this:
Date:
Aug 18, 2021 , yes ...me.
He has a right to serve. He became a problem when he started blabbing . Ministry of Defense wasted time on explaining his verbal blunders , thats what was annoying . In interviews he also dragged Wills in by claiming that William wasn't allowed to serve in a combat role but wanted it(guessing...
tattle.life
''His docs were sealed in 2000(probably because of the UK Trade thing) until 2069.
Bit of trivia. ''