Harry & Meghan #346 You've heard of the Hippocratic Oath? Here we have the hypocritical oaf.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Order Thread by Most Liked Posts
F

Fredsnail

It'll be what would have been her coronation dress.
 
Reactions: 25

Cinnamon.girl

LadyMuck said:
Bookworm

Click to expand...
Thanks @LadyMuck
BookWorm is uneasy at the message that KC and William seem to be sending to British Realm countries, are they paying as little attention to them as possible? The RF seem to be more concerned about the Ukranians than their own people. After the bushfires in Australia, s couple of letters were sent, but we are housing thousands of Ukranians in nice accommodation. Just her opinion, but something's off and the decisions being made by the senior Royals are odd.
The Harkles went on a date to s sushi bar, but they were with 6 other people (A-listers) and it seemed more like a business meeting. Revival of The Tig? Harry is in awe of celebrities so the Ho might be trying to keep him on-side. BookWorm thinks it's possible that a deal is being set up by WME.
The Ho looked dreadful, trying to look 16, but Harry looked OK.
An odd consequence of Harry's court cases against the press is renewed speculation about the children. Harry wanted the issue resolved "before the birth of the baby". Scobie referred to Archie's "sixth birthday", which was very odd.
There's talk that the birthday party either never took place or was cancelled at the last minute. More tea on that later.
Sarah Duchess of York is launching Tea With the Duchess. The Yorks are not getting any money from the RF and Sarah wants to help Andrew stay in Royal Lodge, which she's entitled to do Owtte.
 
Reactions: 18

wisebutwild

She will probably wear her hand embroidered ‘Dior’ dress she had made especially for the Corrie and then didn’t get an invite to go , with gold flip flops to show off her beautiful feet.

edit …. Just seen @Fredsnail has beaten me to it.
 
Reactions: 18

LadyMuck

Tom Bower on gb news now. Says H fighting 6 court cases. His assault on media can't be good. His lawyer is known for being 'smearist'
 
Reactions: 17
R

rowenagal

If they weren't so much up their own arses they could've had platforms for mental health, racism and surrogacy/childbirth, amongst others. All supported by RF, with a house to live in and a pretty fabulous life. They are pretty stupid.
 
Reactions: 24

LadyMuck

Post coronation tension. All those that helped Camilla be Queen were not invited. A lot of her family were there. TB says Kate did not curtsey to her. Says there's tension between the Wales and Camilla
 
Last edited:
Reactions: 20

wisebutwild

tobehonest said:
Click to expand...
Shaheed Fatima, representing Harry, told the court about refusal to pay for security: “There was no willingness in RAVEC to entertain any exceptions to the policy or listen to representations. We are not even getting out foot through the door. There is no willingness to listen.”

No, cos them’s the rules. The phrase ‘not even getting our foot through the door’ conjures up a vision of the old ‘door to door’ salesman who, if you opened the door to them, would put their foot just inside so you couldn’t close the door again. They would leave their foot there until they persuaded you to buy something………. This ploy won’t be allowed by RAVEC …. No foot, no door ….. on yer bike.

Hope the judge throws this out of court and orders Haz to pay the expenses of both parties.
 
Reactions: 31

HadBax

toninottony said:
If they are both witnesses they are not allowed to be in the courtroom until after they give their testimony in American courts
Click to expand...
Witness exclusion rules may vary by state, but I suspect most states follow the federal rules. In a federal case in the US, witnesses are not automatically excluded from the courtroom before they testify. The judge has to exclude them if a party requests it or if the judge decides on their own to do so. However, that rule does not apply to parties to the lawsuit (I.e., a party is allowed to be in the courtroom before he/she testifies). So, if Harry’s case had been filed in the US, he would be allowed to listen to the other witnesses’ testimony before he testifies.
 
Reactions: 14

tobehonest

LadyMuck said:
Post coronation tension. All those that helped Camilla be Queen were not invited. A lot of her family were there. TB says Kate did not curtsey to her
Click to expand...
There were a lot of Parker bowles there and James and pippa middleton were not allowed their partners. The balcony was horrendous with her grandchildren, sister and friend front and centre and the working royals squashed in corner. William may have been paying her back though as she was not mentioned in his speech. I hope she doesn't cause trouble between the Wales family and Charles.
 
Reactions: 23
R

Rosesarepink

LadyMuck said:
Post coronation tension. All those that helped Camilla be Queen were not invited. A lot of her family were there. TB says Kate did not curtsey to her. Says there's tension between the Wales and Camilla
Click to expand...
Surprised at that as they always seem to warmly embrace each other
 
Reactions: 26
R

Rosesarepink

To be fair PW began his speech with "your majesties" and no one focused on her.
 
Reactions: 27

LadyMuck

Watching the live award where they're arriving, no A list or high profile guests apart from the communist Gloria Steinam
---
Rosesarepink said:
To be fair PW began his speech with "your majesties" and no one focused on her.
Click to expand...
Tom Bower made that point and why
 
Reactions: 16

tobehonest

Reactions: 18
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Menu
Log in
Register