"It should never be okay to make that decision for someone"Happy New Thread!
Thanks Cass for the poll, I couldn't get past the cheque
Saw this screenshot. Aphid taking the moral high groundSorry Scabies, but I will pay for every Brandreth book before I read any of your free column drivel. Sod off, thanks
View attachment 1766102
I agree 100% with what you just stated. I despise her but I absolutely detest him. He was looking for an excuse to turn on his family and smeg gave him permission. I hope they both rot in hell.But this cunt, this Henry don't call me Hazno Harry little bitch is just a class-a, grade-one CUNT. I firmly believe Meghan is mentally disturbed, but Henry isn't ... he's just a nasty bastard.
I think Smeg already has something to blackmail H about.I have seen a few documentaries about him over the years and I am glad they finally found out who he was. Not sure if you have heard of The Lady Of The Dunes but it was another case that was often talked of when Somerton Man/Charles was mentioned. She was a woman found dead in 1974 and like Charles, they had tried for years to figure out her identity. Thankfully, she has finally been identified as Ruth Marie Terry who went missing when she was 37. Unfortunately, though, they have a feeling her killer is already dead so won't face justice.
Back to the bore and the whore, I'm guessing she knows it's 50/50 whether she can get anything from the Royals when we get the inevitable split but Harry on the other hand....what's the bet she has eyes on him 24/7 so she can have something to blackmail him with when the time comes as some sort of insurance.
You don’t have to sign it to be bound by itYou'd have thought she would have signed The Official Secrets Act, wouldn't you
Oh you bugger, at first I thought his writing style was...unusualExcerpts from H’s new book!Cheers!! (Sorry they’re so tiny!)
Oh gawd...
That'll cheer everyone up...
I was asked during a zoom call once. I thought that was a funny way of doing it (the work was about a new govt website). I did adhere to it however.You don’t have to sign it to be bound by it
FFS why do people write this shit?Old to us, but good to see the othertruthsperspectives getting out there ...
View attachment 1765990
Pretty sure Rachel knows her way around dodgy hotels ... I wonder how much she is charging for in-calls these days? (swallowing is extra).So tomorrow is supposed to be the "Power of Women" event in a dodgy Indianapolis conference hotel, with Sparry's Wife as guest speaker.
I have added a comment and will support, so long as it isn’t turned into a pile on and and not a debate forumI’ve been having a rough time of it on the Strictly thread because I dared to suggest that the BBC has a woke agenda. I thought this was widely believed, but it seems not. In fact, I have had comments that hint I am racist. We know that feeling well on this thread. If some of you would like to comment on my new post on the TV thread, “Is the BBC woke?, I would much appreciate it. To have some support would make me feel a great deal better.
The squaddies are giving me much-needed laughs. "You have to be about what you talk about", y'mean like Camilla, Anne, Catherine, Sophie (and the lads, but it talks about 'pretty dresses') doing important things with literacy, protecting women and children, early years, mental health...I suppose the squaddies won't accept Sophie's speech at the UN this March about the treatment of women and girls in Afghanistan as proof?
View attachment 1766140
What does she talk about, usually it's herself." Be about what you talk about"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?