I think when they say parental break they are saying to the world 'conversation is over' they have the last dupers delight after dropping their insults and truth bombs. They will resurface to respond to criticism and unfair treatment and to dish out more blame and cruelty based on emotions.Parental break? From what? Its from whinging how hard done by they are then stay there permanently! Pair of cunts.
So news outlets are doing it because they've been contacted by SS, some are doing it because new baby fluff drives clicks and others just want to report the news without trolls attacking them so go for bland "aww".Lovely new threadThanks to all involved.
Saw an article on Yahoo which said that the kick off about naming Lilibet just shows how differently H&M are treated in comparison to William and Catherine since they also named Charlotte after the Queen.Charlotte is named Elizabeth not Lilibet. Huge difference.
I don't understand why anyone is still supporting the Markles. Are they being paid to do it? I can't think of any other reason to be honest.
This is exactly how I feel too and if they ever set foot in the UK again, I think they’ll be shocked at how many people despise the pair of them.Ive never been involved in these threads but I’ve gone from being originally excited about these two, then to indifference, then to finding them a bit annoying but thinking they were still being judged and treated unfairly, now I’ve just gone to disliking them immensely and being highly annoyed by their antics. How can the name of that child be anything other than a deliberate and blatant slap in the face to The Queen, supposedly someone who they have gone on record to say is a fundamentally awful person, so much so, that they had to publicly disown her?
People are more passionate about football matches than they are the royals in this country (in my opinion). If fans can publicly boo players for disagreeing with them taking a knee, I would not be surprised in the slightest if crowds boo Harry and Meghan the minute they come back to the UK for a formal engagement.
Great article. I particularly liked
If any of these outlets did some proper research they'd realise that, apart from TQ, Charlotte was also given the same second name as her mother and maternal grandmother. And that Charlotte is the female version of Charles and also Pippa's second name, so William and Catherine honoured both sides of the family when they chose her names.Lovely new threadThanks to all involved.
Saw an article on Yahoo which said that the kick off about naming Lilibet just shows how differently H&M are treated in comparison to William and Catherine since they also named Charlotte after the Queen.Charlotte is named Elizabeth not Lilibet. Huge difference.
I don't understand why anyone is still supporting the Markles. Are they being paid to do it? I can't think of any other reason to be honest.
Leave it to the Americans to get their knickers in a twist about women making the choice to have an abortion or not. Sex Education, contraceptive and access to abortions if necessary are not the same as being pro-Abortion (most people think it’s a necessary evil but not a great thing). It’s not as if they would run around and pressure people to have one. Whoever is that interested in the uteruses of strangers should step back and rethink their life choices. H&M do lots of shitty things but that’s just stupid. As if it wasn’t possible to criticise for actual bad actions."HarrysGreySuit on Twitter: "Prince Harry And Meghan Markle Welcome Baby Girl By Asking For Donations To Pro-Abortion Organization!You can’t fix stupid https://tattle.life/threads/19920/" / Twitter"
This is the difference between what the Markles have done and what others like the Cambridges have. It's one thing to honour relatives by giving your child their name as a middle name, I've done it myself with my daughter. It's another thing entirely to give them that name as a first name, especially one so personal and private as Lilibet. The poor child has all the associations and feelings that are bound up with that name and people are making judgements already. In these instances the child doesn't get a chance to be their own person. Princess Charlotte first and foremost is Charlotte and has the opportunity to forge her own path without the constant references to others that Lili will have. It's the same with August and Lucas.A thought occurred to me overnight about giving the child the Queen's name/nickname. It's understandable why none of the Queen's granddaughters or great-granddaughters have Elizabeth as a first name but most do have it as a middle name. It's actually a very big deal to be named after the Queen and there's a worry of not being able to "live up to it" if that makes any sense. Look at all of the Queen's achievements across her life (e.g. longest reigning monarch of the UK, head of the Commonwealth, serving in WWII, etc.). Once she passes she'll have left a great legacy. Could anyone ever live up to her name and legacy?
Judging by how fucked up Harry's wife is, she probably thought that her daughter is going to better than the Queen. But now every time her name is mentioned, it always goes back to the Queen, just reminding everyone that HW is "royal"This is the difference between what the Markles have done and what others like the Cambridges have. It's one thing to honour relatives by giving your child their name as a middle name, I've done it myself with my daughter. It's another thing entirely to give them that name as a first name, especially one so personal and private as Lilibet. The poor child has all the associations and feelings that are bound up with that name and people are making judgements already. In these instances the child doesn't get a chance to be their own person. Princess Charlotte first and foremost is Charlotte and has the opportunity to forge her own path without the constant references to others that Lili will have. It's the same with August and Lucas.
“Indeed, Lilibet is not even a name at all. Meghan and Harry might just as well have chosen ‘Doll Face’ , ‘Cutie Pie’ or ‘Tootsie Wootsie.’ My father called my mother ‘Buttercup,’ but had he attempted to christen me that, I would have thrown the Holy Water in his face”.
Thank you @DandyTandy and @Rayne for new thread and great titleThanks to @Rayne for another brilliant title. Harkles are still c****. They are now on parental break. We all need a break after the name drop, insulting HMTQ. RF wished them well via social media. No mention of the titles or the full name of the baby. 60% of the people voted “how dare they” in response to the name of doll #2. Thank you to all 1477 people who voted. TQ also invited hazzo to lunch when he comes to the UK for unveiling of the statue.
for this poll, I know smeggy wants “all of the above”. But she must’ve want one of those more than others. I thought this could be fun to see what everyone else thinks.
link to the previous thread
Harry and Meghan #111 When your Compliments card has more titles than your son ever will
Thanks to @Rayne for the Rayne-ing title. Lilibet (Lili) Diana Mountbatten-Windsor was born on Friday Jun 4, 2021. Exactly 3 days ago. Although there was an article that the baby is due on Jun 10, which coincides with PP's 100th birthday and Biden visiting the UK for summit and meeting TQ...tattle.life
You've got to laugh really.Indeed, Lilibet is not even a name at all. Meghan and Harry might just as well have chosen ‘Doll Face’ , ‘Cutie Pie’ or ‘Tootsie Wootsie.’ My father called my mother ‘Buttercup,’ but had he attempted to christen me that, I would have thrown the Holy Water in his face.
loved this paragraph - book out today talking about it on tv - how lovely it is - sychophants Kelly and Ross King - they are saying that because 3 of the letters in Diana (think he is trying to be ironic) are also in Dorito it is a nod to HFEW too -
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?