Agreed! Everyone has goofy/unflattering photos but these are truly disturbingThe ugliness that resides in her heart often shows on the outside.
Proves alll her mental health stuff was play acting. She'll either have to back down on those claims somehow (she can't) or make out that the fresh invigorating air of Montecito has completely cleared her mind, and she's ready to be the face of BLM.She'd melt like a plastic spoon in the heat of the political kitchen. If she can't hack (I don't believe for one second she couldn't) being in the RF for 18 months.... What the fuck chance has she coping in politics? Stupid cunt.
In her case 'BLM' means 'Be Like Me'.... the narcProves alll her mental health stuff was play acting. She'll either have to back down on those claims somehow (she can't) or make out that the fresh invigorating air of Montecito has completely cleared her mind, and she's ready to be the face of BLM.
I was wondering if there would be anything coming from BP today - isn't it a year since Megshit? Is she waiting to see what happens - and then Oprah will release whatever footage went onto the cutting room floor. No doubt naming Princess Anne (glory be upon her, glory to her name) as the racey one. Incidentally, the comments under the Star's reveal are (currently) golden.Has she said anything since the interview? She's being strangely quiet, not like her at all.
I think that if we take away all the horrible things she is, then ultimately she just couldn't do the job of being a working royal. She wasn't capable of it and lets face it, not many people are. Someone like Michelle Obama could have done the role perfectly but not Megain. She doesn't have the ability.
She was a failure and hasn't realised it.
Waiting to see what she does next. Hope the papers get the appeal so we can see her in court.
If we get anything, it will come on 1 AprilI was wondering if there would be anything coming from BP today - isn't it a year since Megshit? Is she waiting to see what happens - and then Oprah will release whatever footage went onto the cutting room floor. No doubt naming Princess Anne (glory be upon her, glory to her name) as the racey one. Incidentally, the comments under the Star's reveal are (currently) golden.
*sigh* I think he was in Buffy as wellJust another actor jumping on the bandwagon and getting his name out there.
She wanted a salary from the Royal Foundation, as I remember the gossip, for all her 'important work'.Anyone else met and started dating a 30+year old man, and then been angry because his in-laws wouldn't just pay for you and suggested you keep working?
Nope? Just Meghan, then.
Or maybe ....I dunno...the muti-millionaire boyfriend could have offered to support her? Why would the palace get involved in paying for a girl friend?
I cannot believe that Harry - as a GROWN MAN - expected her bills to be paid by Papa, too.They really are like a pair of spoilt teenagers, aren't they?
Harry: But that was right at the beginning, when she wasn’t going to get security, when members of my family were suggesting that she carries on acting, because there was not enough money to pay for her, and all this sort of stuff. Like, there was some real obvious signs before we even got married that this was going to be really hard.
If only this were true
What if she was lying about all that the same way she lied in that interview? I can't believe anything that she says without corroboration. I have to proceed from the assumption that everything Megzy says is a lie until proven otherwise. So when she starts telling wonderful stories about Doria, or when she starts telling horrific abuse stories about Tom, I'm going to file them in the same bin.This weird article has appeared in US magazine. We know that her father basically brought her up and her mum was absent. Is Meghan trying to rewrite a ‘narrative’ about her father in line with what Lady C hinted at?
https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrit...ys-had-complicated-relationship-with-her-dad/
For posterity, I’ve attached a piece from the Tig where she raves about her dad. He just sounds really sweet & thoughtful.
It's certainly a bit odd and tells us nothing of value. Obviously propaganda to discredit Thomas Markle in case he gets within spitting distance of an interview with Oprah. Why else would this random pop up now? Smeggy must be paying a fortune to all her PR people and online troll bots. The only bright side is that it might eventually bankrupt herThis weird article has appeared in US magazine. We know that her father basically brought her up and her mum was absent. Is Meghan trying to rewrite a ‘narrative’ about her father in line with what Lady C hinted at?
https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrit...ys-had-complicated-relationship-with-her-dad/
For posterity, I’ve attached a piece from the Tig where she raves about her dad. He just sounds really sweet & thoughtful.
Even if he called the Archbishop a liar and said that he *did* use the proper Church of England marriage service in the garden and really married them without witnesses and then married them again "play acting" it actually presents problems for the Harkles because the validity of the "legal" marriage is now in question because you can't actually do it twice and "fake" it just for witnesses. It gets him into trouble but also is Meghan really married in that case?
The Archbish didn't really give sugars anything to attack him over so no "angry white man" narrative either.
So it's in his best interest if he downplays it and pretends its not important rather than the fact that even the Harks admitted it was a false statement which now means everything should be questioned.
It’s that British sense of humour all the way.If we get anything, it will come on 1 April
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?