This is a strange divert link to a fact or fiction site. It's fiction.Hopefully nothing in it and internet goss -
‘Prince Philip is Dead’; Rumor Spreads Like Wildfire
Social media users are reporting a real-life, fast-spreading rumor Prince Philip (husband to Queen Elizabeth) died around January 17 2020.www.google.co.uk
But seriously she Seems happy for now so that's good enough for me.Yeah, good luck with that
IAlways thought it odd 11 year old Meghan writing about female inequality to Hilary Clinton is the story that gets repeatedly told, highlighted in Meghan’s UN speech.
When we had the announcement of the BBC/Prince Andrew interview...Hilary is at Frogmore Cottage, reportedly to meet Archie and there was mutual fangirling. What was the real purpose of her visit?
A source close to Meghan says how she is ‘worried’ after the interview airs as Meghan works to empower women...but continues to fawn over Clinton who rode the same Lolita Express as Andrew and Epstein.
Not a Meghan fan, I tried to like her once she got engaged to Prince Harry, but based on her own actions/speeches/interviews,I found myself disliking her more.
Personally I think she's been kicked out of the Royal Family for a lot longer than we know. The whole situation smacks of a cover up to me. The fact she associates herself with Hilary Clinton screams in my opinion, of shady business. Would love to know more Intel on this Toronto paper person/people, that's intriguing.To me these screenshots imply the following - what's everyone's take on it?
Dec 28th - weren't they ment to be in Canada not Hollywood?
Jan 1st - M&H aren't together NYE. Also implies TorontoPaper (TP) is with H or near by?
Jan 5th - key words here are again and before - has M cheated on H? With Andrew maybe
Jan 6 - why isnt she staying at FC with H? Or with H full stop?
Jan 6 - "one of us will see you tomorrow" to me implies that TP is more than one person?
Jan 6 - what clinic?!
Jan 7 - Nick who? Again says us implying more than one person to account and that they will see M in a bit.
Jan 8 - where was M meant to be this date?
Jan 8 - references garden party - could TP be in Charles' inner circle?
Jan 15 - suggests M is using old pics and is running the show herself?
My mind boggles.
Whats your views, Darlings?!
OOOPS so sorry I hit the wrong emojiCheck Google and twitter - rumours are circulating this evening that he has passed. Hopefully not true.
Omg. Imagine it was Ghislaine Maxwell!I thought the same, plus the sentence construction comes across as someone possibly bi lingual...definitely French speaking. With the references to her past ‘bump’, I thought maybe Corey Vitellio (Meghan’s ex before Harry) the talk of the ‘accomplices’ making front page of The Sun newspaper...Meghan’s friends at the baby shower, accomplices seems like they all did something together or knew of it?
Ha it could be Madam Maxwell herself, fluent in French and English and defending those close like Trump and warning Meghan to stay out of politics.
He isn't dead FFS!Check Google and twitter - rumours are circulating this evening that he has passed. Hopefully not true.
He isn't dead FFS!Check Google and twitter - rumours are circulating this evening that he has passed. Hopefully not true.
I felt sorry for her too. She looks riddled with anxiety. As for Harry constantly looking out/over her- I’d say that looks like a partner that has been asked to do that. I know when I go out with my other half, which is not often, actually even visiting his mum, I ask him to please not leave me aloneOh I’m going to get flak for this, but these clips made me feel pretty sorry for her.
I know I know..
But it’s painfully obvious she’s completely uncomfortable and lost and doesn’t know protocol.
It was a “whirlwind romance” and she didn’t have time to get prepared for all this (like Kate did being that they dated for like 8 yrs) and it’s clear as day watching this. Don’t get me wrong, can’t stand the greedy witch but yeah.
The thing is, I find it totally understandable for it all being overwhelming for her at the beginning of it all, but after a while she should know/do better at these things?I felt sorry for her too. She looks riddled with anxiety. As for Harry constantly looking out/over her- I’d say that looks like a partner that has been asked to do that. I know when I go out with my other half, which is not often, actually even visiting his mum, I ask him to please not leave me alone
But saying all that, could she not just have watched some YouTube videos or tutorials on protocol
Actually she managed to get married in front of millions of viewers, so scrap all that
Wonder if she'll retire then. Perhaps she's still fully active due to not wanting to spend lazy days listening to Phil's ramblings.Every day people are saying prince Philip has died! He does look like a zombie.
Sad thing is once he goes I doubt the queen will last two years
MM will NEVER be happy and time will testify to that.I'm glad that Meghan is happy now.
Look how skinny she isNope. He's still cunt struck. Gonna have to wait this one out guys.
She's either drunk or high.
She managed the run on without falling off her jimmy choos so I suspect high.
Is it Sophie Trudeau? Fondness for exclamation marks, no capital letter on ‘winter’-same as her Instagram posts,odd when the person seems not as lax about other words. Maybe snubbed with no wedding invite? Sophie has a keen interest in the arts-Quoting the poem attributed to Anne Boleyn, is bilingual. The political references make sense and the references to Meghan’s friends. Plus Justin would have access to the palace and Australian/NZ/Moroccan contacts.And it’s definitely someone educated. These sayings are not the ones you hear in every day conversation... And I agree about the sentence structure. The tweets are not just cryptic because of the vocabulary and references but also because of the wonky syntax. Agatha Christie would be so proud of our work
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?