Harry and Meghan #33 When Needy met Greedy

[HereWeGoAgain101]

"Vulnerable"? MM is about as vulnerable as a Komodo dragon riding in a Sherman tank.

In narcissist speak, I’m going to pull out because I don’t have 5 friends who will do this for the money I’m prepared to pay. Her goose is cooked. She is going to withdraw!!!!

 

[antinoos]

About this Aunty, the case surely hinges on the fact that the famous five were integral in the debacle. How can they, as key witnesses, be anonymous? As a lay person I kind of can’t see how they can be kept private. It’s been made such a public issue it’s now in the public interest to know who we are dealing with. I’d love to be a fly on any of their walls

Like Ive said HWGA101 youre absolutely right. Its not in the public interest to keep evidence or its sources secret unless: its kids, state secrets or might prejudice other serious (ie criminal) proceedings. As I understand it Meghans arguments are based on their identity "young mothers not in the public eye" the court is hardly going to rule that no "young mother etc" who is a witness in proceedings can be named; and also speculation about what the Mail might do to them if they are allowed to name them which is not the kind of theoretical proposition courts like to take into account for obvious reasons.

Thats why I think, unless there is something we dont know, the Application seems misconceived and hopeless.

Worth their salt indeed!

I thought Meghan wanted their identities kept secret up until the point they had to give evidence, cos the mail/all media would doorstep them and their families, publish everything they could find out?

Which see my reply to HWGA101 would mean no witness against the Press could ever be named. It really seems hopeless but we dont know all the details.

 

[poshspice88]

Uhh......... Yeah, No!!

Thank you!

 

[Palpatine]

It’s ok I’ve got a escapegoat lined up to take the fall. A right gullible ginger twat currently living off the grid in LA. The fool will do and say anything for a whiff of stale minge and I’ve got a goop candle for that.

Fixed that. No, don't thank me.

I was thinking of doing that but decided against rocking the boat tonight

 

[Silly-old-Slapper]

That just reads like one of those long qvc advertorials.

But with no easypay option!

 

[Oona]

https://archive.ph/QlaO3

 

[Charlie-dog]

I think she was. If not, the RF would have ammunition to throw her under the bus.

HOWEVER, I do think she “accentuated” her pregnancy to make her look more motherly and vulnerable. The wild ups and downs of her bump are suspicious but she clearly gained face weight and had an (even) thicker waist after the birth.

I think the face was due to surgery and the waist due to relaxing her so called vegan diet. I highly doubt she was pregnant.

 

[Campagne]

Yes, it's front page of the Sydney Morning Herald, which is a Times equivalent.

Sydney Morning Herald (let me know if it goes to paywall, I can see all of the text)

Also news.com.au and 7 News.com.au.

Great articles in the SMH.

 

[Just_me1954]

This list is a crock of shite! They forgot to list us tattlers

Shhhhhhhhhh

 

[Blade Runner]

I agree but think think he may have complex issues. Maybe learning difficulties, ADHD or even something else. He’s had the kid gloves treatment for his whole life, and not necessarily wholly because of the loss of his mother. I think there is genuine fear for him within the RF.


Can’t a defendant defend themselves in this country?

You know what they say, “a man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client”

 

[Izzie321]

Megz (via Rushbrooke) has said they are 'unwilling'. How would she know? What business is it of hers?

A bit unfortunate, then, that Friend B has apparently already provided a statement.

Do we know this was privately provided, or without Megan’s knowledge?

Hearing over, no judgment today.

It is so drawn out isn’t it. Thought there is no judgement, some interesting tid bits from today!

 

[NOID-phal]

Which see my reply to HWGA101 would mean no witness against the Press could ever be named. It really seems hopeless but we dont know all the details.

Perhaps she's still trying to persuade them to back up her version of events. They've no way of knowing if the mail have proof of who said what, and when.

 

[Angeoudemon]

Sorry for derailing but my SO is a big Alien fan and we have this magnet on our fridge:

Well a lot of things comes to mind for sure...

 

[Isa_Drennan]

There was a change in the weather

Staying on thread very much looking forward to the case tomorrow, will be very interesting.

My apologies if my initial responses led to you or others getting a warning.

 

[Oona]

I’ve just been on the DM app (I know, sorry) and all the Ginge and Cringe articles have magically disappeared off the app. Not deleted (I think) just moved off the main stories. However the Times have deleted the Roya Nikkah (which I always read as Royal Knickers) article about G&C refusing help over dad Markle. I wonder what’s going on??

This is interesting, something to do with the court case maybe.

 

[Silbee]

If it is Jessica who has issued her own private statement to the court, what does that mean, can anyone make sense of that?

 

[mardymare]

Jessica?

İ'm guessing Friend B could be Jessica or Abigail Spencer (knows contact at People)??

 

[Oona]

I haven’t heard/read that before. If that’s true, then you’re right, cold and calculating.

It would explain why they're being so patient with Harry.

 

[Silbee]

What's the quickest way to find out the result of tomorrow's judgment? Wait for it to hit the papers? Or here? : -)

 

[Norbs]

View attachment 193657

Here you are.