It’s only a little screw with a Philips head, so any Philips screwdriver will open it, although I’m sure Cartier will sell replacement gold ones.
It’s only a little screw with a Philips head, so any Philips screwdriver will open it, although I’m sure Cartier will sell replacement gold ones.If it’s not M in the WY photos, then her “double” either has the same Cartier Love bracelet or M does have the key for hers and dressed the double. Diana’s watch, too? M’s wedding rings? I don’t know.
Wow he's turned into a ginger hairy orang-utan now, with an overbite like Freddie Mercury's! Buck-tooth Noballs.Something strange is definitely going on as the old pictures show Archie has a hat on then in the new ones he doesn't have a hat on, Archie's hair looks brown in the photos that were released before yet the new ones show he has ginger hair and in some of the photos Harry is sitting next to Meghan yet in some of the other photos he isn't. Actually I have just looked at the photos again and the hat isn't anywhere to be seen in the photos where Archie is not wearing it. So, where exactly has the hat gone and why is Archie only wearing it in some photos.
View attachment 1403607View attachment 1403608
Wow wasnt expecting that, it doesn't look like her recently from behind and particularly as there arent any shots of her camera loving face.The body language guy has announced it's definitely smeg.
Did she wear that bracelet on her wedding day?That is whats so disturbed about her. Same with the blood diamonds from the Kashoggi killer. She only cares about the bling and status she feels the jewelry gives her. The blood of her ancestors and Kashoggi are incidental in comparison to her need for this polo chick major bling look at me I belong status. Disturbing. Disordered. Just wow. The narc mind is fascinating. A dark, dirty, fucked up place to be. I'm so glad I'm a normie. I hope the bracelet hooks onto something as she is passing at high speed and shows her the secondary danger of wearing such a stupid bracelet.
Yes, very surprised. Looked way too slim to be her.Wow wasnt expecting that, it doesn't look like her recently from behind and particularly as there arent any shots of her camera loving face.
Silly games, silly games.
Super easy to get fakes. Super hard to magic up a slim waist/long torso and lose 20 kilos and her huge butt in 2 weeksIf it’s not M in the WY photos, then her “double” either has the same Cartier Love bracelet or M does have the key for hers and dressed the double. Diana’s watch, too? M’s wedding rings? I don’t know.
Ok. Apologies... what is the ice cream sandwich thingy? Did I miss that pist? And there is an irban dictionary angle too? Well wouldn't be a first with these desperate jokersThe whole ice cream sandwich scenario is so absurd, I suspect perhaps someone is subtly telling us the set up is bullshit, and things are not what they seem. It’s such a surreal thing to do - I think it’s a clue to not believe what we see here.
Pure class, isn't she?
Trevor obviously gave her the cheeper model. The man isn't that stupid after allI had a look on a jewellers website (not Cartier themselves). The bracelets have been about since 1969 and are based on the chastity belt!
They cost thousands and the site said the ones with diamonds are a pass into high profile events.
It listed well-known wearers including Angelina Jolie, but no mention of Minge.
Also Burton and Taylor. Couples can have them and they exchange screwdrivers as a sign of commitment.
There's no way she would remove a pass to high-profile events - a grifter's version of a festival wristband - plus Trev probably binned the screwdriver when he received her rings back.
Do we definitely believe it came from Trev and not some sinister puppet master with a home in Wyoming who is working to bring down the British Monarchy??
Minge's chastity bracelet!
ETA Just google Cartier Love Bracelet @Chita
You're right. They wouldn't.Worth watching.
Him reading out the post supposedly from the person who spotted them, is hilarious.
Also an excellent point, why on earth would someone in America think 'oh someone important, must be the royal family' or words to that effect. Rubbish.
Thanks again Mardy, much appreciated as ever.Lady C plunging right in
Downfall of Boris? Toppled by a coup. Carrie was a catalyst. Boris is a little raggedy around the edges and has trouble keeping his zipper up, but is a great leader in Lady C's opinion. Great leaders are always flawed. Boris delivered Brexit. Johnson gone means Brexit gone? Boris also wanted to follow the Swedish covid model which has been acknowledged as the most sensible approach.
New leader? 12 front runners but no clear replacement. Lady C has met Dishy Rishi and found him very personable. Most likely candidate.
Haz asking for securiddy? Haz stripped of İPP status as no longer a senior working royal. Conflict of interest to pay for police securiddy. Haz has been gunning for Sir Edward Young who has been protecting the interests of the Crown and TQ. Neither Smeg nor Haz plays by acceptable, reasonable or constructive rules. Lady C does not see the judge ruling in Haz's favour. Harkles are aiming for 24-hour securiddy as if İPP status.
Wyoming appearance? Possible response to Megan McCain article where she stated that Smeg would have to mingle with people and show the kids to be successful in political office. Smeg has already sabotaged her chances. People have already seen what the Harkles are by their nasty departure from TRF and continuing vitriol and perpetual attention-seeking. The Harkle's desperation for attention triggers repulsion and deep distaste yet renders them fascinating at the same time. They also wanted to rain on Catherine and William's Wimbledon parade.
Teaser? Lady C mentioned the possibility of some juicy news that cuts through some speculation but saving it for next time.
BIB your postHow it must have hurt to be basically smuggled from the airport to Frogmore when they were over for the Jubilee.
And of course they were so scared for their security they had to open a window in the car bringing them to the service.
I absolutely agree, they want the prestige and the importance of being escorted about.
Motorcades, outriders and the whole works. Pair of twits.
I still think her feet were too small. Unless she's had more surgery.Yes, very surprised. Looked way too slim to be her.
If I recall correctly, the initial version of that website did state that they were IPPs (as in, it included the actual phrase). And there was wording along the lines of ‘Harry and Archie are blood royals’. I remember it as it struck me as desperate much?And in their sussexroyal website, they made sure to mention security and that they are IPPs.This appears to have been deleted: It's still there
View attachment 1404370
Their website was such a silly thing to do without consulting everyone, they thought they were so clever and sneaky but now we know what they wanted and lost.
They lost the prestige of "serving the monarchy", "strengthening the commonwealth" and the prestige of being "internationally protected persons" and most important usage of the HRH.
A reminder:
View attachment 1404356
we think NOT.
Has to be some serious photoshopping going on, imo.I still think her feet were too small. Unless she's had more surgery.
The body language guy has turned into an attention seeker with a big ego (and he's misogynistic at times), so these days I take what he says with a grain of salt.The body language guy has announced it's definitely smeg.
Yeah, because every time I’m in town and there’s some sort of parade going on, when security or police move us on a little bit for crowd control, the first thing that always comes into my mind is, oh, Meghan Markle and her other half must be here and I really need to get my camera out to get a picture of their backs because that’s a beautiful hat she’s wearingWorth watching.
Him reading out the post supposedly from the person who spotted them, is hilarious.
Also an excellent point, why on earth would someone in America think 'oh someone important, must be the royal family' or words to that effect. Rubbish.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?