Thank you for the synopsis. I can't bear to watch morning tv shite at the best of times.Here's my synopsis of that interview:
Total denial of Meghan's involvement in the book.
M&H aware of the book being written but nothing to do with it.
Book dragged into the court case which made the couple aware of what was in it.
Palace not keen to be involved in the process of the book but friends of the couple felt it was an opportunity to set record straight on Meghan's reputation.
The hope of the book was to provide the other side of the story that the tabloids were presenting about Meghan.
The book was going to set rumours straight and tell the story of their romance - their love story.
As time went on it became more about the couple's terrible time within the institution, mental health and racism.
Scabies has just claimed that he has encountered some kind of 'prejudice' from Royal aids at times.
'Recollections may vary' - Queen was only the messenger, the institution delivered that message. These words really stood out to the couple.
When Meghan was accused of being an 'office bully' the press all got briefed about it around the World but the lips are sealed on the issue of racism. The Monarchy could have at least condemned racism. Royal family did not speak up during the BLM resurgence!
That silence speaks volumes.
When pressed on the racism he had encountered, Scabies kept referring to prejudice, not racism. Because he is a mixed race royal correspondant. Would not name who was prejudiced - a senior member of the palace who found it peculiar that Scobie spoke 'as well as he does' Sure it was not from a nasty place. He used to being asked where he is from but he found that statement about his speech to be very loaded. Meghan would have been dealing with it on 100x bigger scale being the first bi-racial member of the royal family!
Alleged rift between W and H - fractures have not been mended. Due to pandemic. Two family moments didn't provide opportunity for healing as focus was entirely on those events. Not the time or place. No senior family member trying to play peace maker. If Diana was here today, that is exactly what she would do!
Excuse spelling mistakes, wanted to get through that as fast as I could. He's so drippy IRL - facially and personality wise!
Thanks for taking one for the team @spangly, I can't watch ITV ever since they broadcast 'that interview'. Obviously they paid so much for it and then realised it was one big con that they have ended up with egg all over their faces.Here's my synopsis of that interview:
Total denial of Meghan's involvement in the book.
M&H aware of the book being written but nothing to do with it.
Book dragged into the court case which made the couple aware of what was in it.
Palace not keen to be involved in the process of the book but friends of the couple felt it was an opportunity to set record straight on Meghan's reputation.
The hope of the book was to provide the other side of the story that the tabloids were presenting about Meghan.
The book was going to set rumours straight and tell the story of their romance - their love story.
As time went on it became more about the couple's terrible time within the institution, mental health and racism.
Scabies has just claimed that he has encountered some kind of 'prejudice' from Royal aids at times.
'Recollections may vary' - Queen was only the messenger, the institution delivered that message. These words really stood out to the couple.
When Meghan was accused of being an 'office bully' the press all got briefed about it around the World but the lips are sealed on the issue of racism. The Monarchy could have at least condemned racism. Royal family did not speak up during the BLM resurgence!
That silence speaks volumes.
When pressed on the racism he had encountered, Scabies kept referring to prejudice, not racism. Because he is a mixed race royal correspondant. Would not name who was prejudiced - a senior member of the palace who found it peculiar that Scobie spoke 'as well as he does' Sure it was not from a nasty place. He used to being asked where he is from but he found that statement about his speech to be very loaded. Meghan would have been dealing with it on 100x bigger scale being the first bi-racial member of the royal family!
Alleged rift between W and H - fractures have not been mended. Due to pandemic. Two family moments didn't provide opportunity for healing as focus was entirely on those events. Not the time or place. No senior family member trying to play peace maker. If Diana was here today, that is exactly what she would do!
Excuse spelling mistakes, wanted to get through that as fast as I could. He's so drippy IRL - facially and personality wise!
Especially, according to Wiki, as it was in Frogmore HOUSE that Sore and Whore held their wedding reception. What could be sweeter!Ooh!! The Telegraph is reporting that the Cambridges' new Windsor Home might be Frogmore House. How I'd love that, when Smegatron got the cottage.
Oh please let it be true.
Take that Smeggy. Whump! Splat! A slap in the kisser with a rancid old fish.
It'd be so incendiary we'd see the flames in Monteshithole from the UK.
Because Herself cares So Much for humanity that she wants to ensure the wellbeing of even the hate-filled lowlife British press?I think Omid has really messed up this time, someone has taken a screenshot of the book and it states that HW contacted one of the co-authors to see if they were ok following "trolling" why would they do that if they had printed lies about them?
Could be a silly attempt at cover up story incase court orders phone records for trialI think Omid has really messed up this time, someone has taken a screenshot of the book and it states that HW contacted one of the co-authors to see if they were ok following "trolling" why would they do that if they had printed lies about them?
Of course it is. Since the courts have been involved Aphid has gone to great lengths to emphasize the word “sources” whenever he speaks of the gruesome twosome.Could be a silly attempt at cover up story incase court orders phone records for trial
I have just set it to download so will try & investigate later - I really have to do some housework & feed the teenagersHas anyone got access to sky arts on freeview uK?
Put it on now - programme about paintings in buckingham palace. "Inside art."
The presenter (kate bryan) is talking to rosanna de sancha the art conservator.
Rosanna's voice sounds very like Celt - as in Celt Views on youtube.
Same soft way of speaking and similar intonation.
Could it be her???
CalvinThe report from OFCOM really pulls no punches does it, they won't be able to pull that stunt again.
I find that she appealed to the ITV chief as a fellow woman and mother particularly nauseating.
BIB: He really talked about BLM? Why should the royals talk about it when they're not supposed to get involved with politics?! For a royal correspondent you'd think he'd have known that.Here's my synopsis of that interview:
Total denial of Meghan's involvement in the book.
M&H aware of the book being written but nothing to do with it.
Book dragged into the court case which made the couple aware of what was in it.
Palace not keen to be involved in the process of the book but friends of the couple felt it was an opportunity to set record straight on Meghan's reputation.
The hope of the book was to provide the other side of the story that the tabloids were presenting about Meghan.
The book was going to set rumours straight and tell the story of their romance - their love story.
As time went on it became more about the couple's terrible time within the institution, mental health and racism.
Scabies has just claimed that he has encountered some kind of 'prejudice' from Royal aids at times.
'Recollections may vary' - Queen was only the messenger, the institution delivered that message. These words really stood out to the couple.
When Meghan was accused of being an 'office bully' the press all got briefed about it around the World but the lips are sealed on the issue of racism. The Monarchy could have at least condemned racism. Royal family did not speak up during the BLM resurgence!
That silence speaks volumes.
When pressed on the racism he had encountered, Scabies kept referring to prejudice, not racism. Because he is a mixed race royal correspondant. Would not name who was prejudiced - a senior member of the palace who found it peculiar that Scobie spoke 'as well as he does' Sure it was not from a nasty place. He used to being asked where he is from but he found that statement about his speech to be very loaded. Meghan would have been dealing with it on 100x bigger scale being the first bi-racial member of the royal family!
Alleged rift between W and H - fractures have not been mended. Due to pandemic. Two family moments didn't provide opportunity for healing as focus was entirely on those events. Not the time or place. No senior family member trying to play peace maker. If Diana was here today, that is exactly what she would do!
Excuse spelling mistakes, wanted to get through that as fast as I could. He's so drippy IRL - facially and personality wise!
Didn't he say that his DNA test came back as Caucasian? He's just jumping on the bandwagon that suits him.BIB: He really talked about BLM? Why should the royals talk about it when they're not supposed to get involved with politics?! For a royal correspondent, you'd think he'd have known that.
Also, I doubt anyone was even "racist" to him. He's not even mixed race! I doubt any of the palace aides would have even talked to him so he can't even name any names.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?