I think they mean "stunning" as in "I was hit in the face with a frying pan, and it was stunning"Stunning obviously means something completely different now, does it?He is not a nice looking man, and putting on a dress doesn't change that, in any way.
If a woman looked like this in a photo everyone would be slating her and saying how she looks old etc (much like the Eddie Izzard wearing that dress that a member of the Spanish? royal family wore and he supposedly looked great and she was too old to wear it or something???)
God the idea that men make better women than biological women melts my brain
we are expected to fawn over them for nothingThere was an AGP next to me at The Killers concert earlier this year, I moved away as I just wasn't comfortable with a guy with a fetish nest to me.Spotted today, one AGP in a mini-skirt, a top and tights, then, ten minutes later, another, in a tight pencil skirt and a top,bare legs.
I wonder what they'd do if they encountered each other and realised they're a common breed and their fetishism is everywhere?
BTW, I could see all their tight-fitting clothing because it was 7 degrees here and everyone, especially the women were wearing coats.
No coats for the AGPs though. How else would they get off on it all?
It's a small town here as well.
‘Stunning’, well, yeah I am stunned. Stunned by how this perverted grifter thinks he can pretend to be a woman. Stunned that he’s in Vogue. Stunned but not surprised.
" Don't worry, Lisa........So Lisa Nandy reckons that society will be 'utterly ashamed' in the future for the way that transgender women are currently being treated. She repeats the ridiculous claim that trans women and girls are the most marginalised and discriminated against group in our country. What nonsense: from where I'm standing, their rights and feelings are constantly being prioritised over women's.
Lisa Nandy defends transgender support after JK Rowling attack
The Labour frontbencher said the furore ‘breaks my heart’ as she re-reads Harry Potter with her son following the author’s criticism.www.standard.co.uk
She has the temerity to say that the debate over trans issues shouldn't be reduced to body parts. Again, I'm confused: it is precisely my body parts that make me a woman. It is also part of the trans ideology that reduces woman to body parts by using terms such as 'chestfeeders' and' cervix havers'
I sincerely hope and expect that history will look back at this time and marvel that a very tiny minority were able to successfully capture governments and institutions to such an extent that those of us stating the scientific fact that no-one can change their sex are vilified and called bigots.
That woman is an enemy of women and shouldn't be allowed in a position where she makes decisions that affect us. Should would throw us under the bus if she could and promote 0.00000001 of people instead while women's issues get worse. That is irrational and not a choice of someone who is has full mental capacity.So Lisa Nandy reckons that society will be 'utterly ashamed' in the future for the way that transgender women are currently being treated. She repeats the ridiculous claim that trans women and girls are the most marginalised and discriminated against group in our country. What nonsense: from where I'm standing, their rights and feelings are constantly being prioritised over women's.
Lisa Nandy defends transgender support after JK Rowling attack
The Labour frontbencher said the furore ‘breaks my heart’ as she re-reads Harry Potter with her son following the author’s criticism.
She has the temerity to say that the debate over trans issues shouldn't be reduced to body parts. Again, I'm confused: it is precisely my body parts that make me a woman. It is also part of the trans ideology that reduces woman to body parts by using terms such as 'chestfeeders' and' cervix havers'
I sincerely hope and expect that history will look back at this time and marvel that a very tiny minority were able to successfully capture governments and institutions to such an extent that those of us stating the scientific fact that no-one can change their sex are vilified and called bigots.
Depressingly yes I remember this. He was using that baby to satisfy his sexual desires but because he glams to be a trans woman, paedophilia is okay
*claimsDepressingly yes I remember this. He was using that baby to satisfy his sexual desires but because he glams to be a trans woman, paedophilia is okay
He looks like he’s been dragged through a bush backwards; more stunned than stunning.
www.bbc.co.uk
Thank you. I’d completely forgotten his name!!
yes this confused me as well. Surely genetic sex is all about body parts? We look at a baby when it is born and define them as male or female depending on the sexual characteristics that are seen. So being a man or a woman or male or female is actually all about body parts.So Lisa Nandy reckons that society will be 'utterly ashamed' in the future for the way that transgender women are currently being treated. She repeats the ridiculous claim that trans women and girls are the most marginalised and discriminated against group in our country. What nonsense: from where I'm standing, their rights and feelings are constantly being prioritised over women's.
Lisa Nandy defends transgender support after JK Rowling attack
The Labour frontbencher said the furore ‘breaks my heart’ as she re-reads Harry Potter with her son following the author’s criticism.
She has the temerity to say that the debate over trans issues shouldn't be reduced to body parts. Again, I'm confused: it is precisely my body parts that make me a woman. It is also part of the trans ideology that reduces woman to body parts by using terms such as 'chestfeeders' and' cervix havers'
I sincerely hope and expect that history will look back at this time and marvel that a very tiny minority were able to successfully capture governments and institutions to such an extent that those of us stating the scientific fact that no-one can change their sex are vilified and called bigots.
