He's trying to make out they are aggressive and tough. And they might be more than a more privaleged but I have a chance defending myself against the average woman and not a hope in hell with the average man.
He's trying to make out they are aggressive and tough. And they might be more than a more privaleged but I have a chance defending myself against the average woman and not a hope in hell with the average man.Reading the comments and it seems that everyone is just as confused, but trying to be polite about it. It's all attention seeking. Who cares.
The "women in prison are no angels" comment tells you everything you need to know about how TiMs such as India view women. That women in prison are fair game and deserve to be attacked.
India came out with the usual bollocks about how trans people are 20x more likely to be attacked. I'm sure India is well aware that women are murdered daily because they're women. As someone who claims to be a biological woman (!), you'd think India would be fighting our corner. But their hatred for woman was so clear last night.
"She" is and it's beyond stupid to buy pads and tampons when you clearly don't need them. You don't have a womb that sheds it's lining every month. Buying pads and tampons doesn't make you a biological woman.Willoughby is a dreadful person.
Shame he didn't transition to a decent human being. See also Bruce JennerWilloughby is a dreadful person.
Rampant narcissists could do with having to serve something other than their own egos, for a change.I swear all these self indulgent fools need to do some national service.
His parents need to kick him to the kerb
£320? Good- less money the cunt can spend on fagsView attachment 1933148
Gosh, I always read about women exposing their fannies when confronted by the police. Why don’t the papers just avoid using shit like ‘her penis’ () and use ‘the accused’ or even just the name? Clunky but no more clunky than her penis FFS.
Yes! I've seen TIMs (Jane Fae etc) talk about rapists and say things like "that's one example of a trans person doing....not nice things...it doesn't they're all like that". Not nice thingsWhat a display from India last night on Question Time. I imagine he thought he was being very clever with his "bad apples" comment. But it totally dilutes the seriousness of what the likes of Adam Graham, Andrew Burns (the bloke who called himself Tiffany Scott), and Stephen Wood (AKA Karen White) have been found guilty of.
To me, a bad apple is someone who is deliberately disruptive, dishonest, unpleasant. That sort of thing. Rapists and violent men are more than fucking BAD APPLES. They are criminals who should be locked up in a MEN'S prison.
I will never let anyone minimise those crimes and brush them off as someone being a bad apple. This is something I've noticed time and time again with TiMs, the manipulation is so obvious once you see it.
Wtf was it only a £320 fine?? That deserves a stint in a mens prison and also to be put on the sex offenders register.View attachment 1933148
Gosh, I always read about women exposing their fannies when confronted by the police. Why don’t the papers just avoid using shit like ‘her penis’ () and use ‘the accused’ or even just the name? Clunky but no more clunky than her penis FFS.
AndWtf was it only a £320 fine?? That deserves a stint in a mens prison and also to be put on the sex offenders register.
They always forget the end of that adage (the police do it too). One bad apple spoils the whole barrel...they are all fucking rotten.What a display from India last night on Question Time. I imagine he thought he was being very clever with his "bad apples" comment. But it totally dilutes the seriousness of what the likes of Adam Graham, Andrew Burns (the bloke who called himself Tiffany Scott), and Stephen Wood (AKA Karen White) have been found guilty of.
To me, a bad apple is someone who is deliberately disruptive, dishonest, unpleasant. That sort of thing. Rapists and violent men are more than fucking BAD APPLES. They are criminals who should be locked up in a MEN'S prison.
I will never let anyone minimise those crimes and brush them off as someone being a bad apple. This is something I've noticed time and time again with TiMs, the manipulation is so obvious once you see it.
I sincerely hope that it wouldnt work.......but if they are already doing it for some women, I assume it must be a matter of time?How would a womb transplant work for a trans women who were born men?
EXCL: MailOnline delves into the controversial world of womb transplants for transwomen, a procedure that could pave the way for the first ever biological male becoming pregnant and give birth.www.dailymail.co.uk
This wouldn’t work, right?
One word means it’s impossible.I sincerely hope that it wouldnt work.......but if they are already doing it for some women, I assume it must be a matter of time?
It just sounds expensive, intrusive and a very complicated way to go about making a baby. Id assume the foetus would be created via IVF, as I cant see how the womb would be able to create viable eggs on a monthly basis, in a male body, and would need a caesarian towards the end
To answer your first question, you would still say "they are", not "they is".I have a grammar question.
As a French citizen English can be confusing and these new pronouns are impossible to learn obviously.
But, I am wondering: when a person wants us to use « they/them » are we supposed to use the plural after or the singular form of the verbs? They are or they is? As it’s for one person?
And why don’t they want us to use « it/its »?
It won't work because of this - the metal ball is the size of a baby's headI sincerely hope that it wouldnt work.......but if they are already doing it for some women, I assume it must be a matter of time?
It just sounds expensive, intrusive and a very complicated way to go about making a baby. Id assume the foetus would be created via IVF, as I cant see how the womb would be able to create viable eggs on a monthly basis, in a male body, and would need a caesarian towards the end
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?