Simple we are women they are trans womenSo, how would you differenciate between us and trans women?
It's called safeguarding sweetheart. You look at the worse case scenario and do your best to not let that happen. Women only spaces mean no men regardless of their identity. If these trans identified males want or need crisis groups then they need to provide their own. Forcing women to validate their delusion is just not acceptable. Men are predators. Trans identified men are men for life, they offend in the same way as other men, popping on a suspender belt doesn't stop this. No one is saying all men are predators but it is accepted that there are men that are are. TIM's are men, nothing changes.Did you read what I said? Consult the group, see if its a concern and also help the transgender woman with her trauma. Seperately too if needs be if concerns are raised about being triggered.
And as I asid, you can't paint all transgender people on one predator, or one person you find annoying. So showing me one picture of a tweet from a trans activist saying horrible things is meaningless. They don't represent everyone who thinks transgender people need support. Just like I don't think one tweet from you would represent all women. There are millions of people who support trans rights, do they all want to spit at people? No? So why do you paint support for a delicate section of society with one persons tweet. Both sides of the argument have bad actors, because thats human beings! I won't judge all people who against transgender people living their lives off one one person who tells them to die.
That they think a cavity, surgically created from dick and ball skin (or, if we're really lucky, colon!) for the sole purpose of being penetrated is analogous to a vagina is one of the most misogynist things about this movement and one of the things that enrages me most.
"Do as I say or I'll kill myself" is a familiar refrain to any of us who have been victims of male interpersonal violence, or manipulation from narcissists of either sex.I guess the difference is that I approach this from, why would you risk leaving so many transgender people behind or in a place of mental decline which could lead to them taking their own life, why take the risk in that? Everyone seems to only deal in absolutes here. Nothing is black and white.
Absolutely.I think it's often quite difficult to make young women understand just how privileged they are, when compared to their mothers, grandmothers and so on. Young handmaidens like Emma Watson for example, take it for granted that they can go to uni, buy their own house or car, go out at night unattended if they wish (they may not feel particularly safe when doing so, but that's another story ), have a career of their choosing, have as many or as few children as they want, with or without a partner. It's no longer legal for their husbands to beat or rape them, they aren't regarded as "property" in law, they aren't expected to "obey" anyone as part of their marriage contract, and they don't have to stary married if they don't want to.
It has taken hundreds of years for women to get these very basic rights, and that's only after a lot of blood, sweat and tears along the way. We still don't get equal pay, flexible working and affordable childcare as standard. We're still being beaten, raped and killed by men who get away with it. We're still expected to do the bulk of the child-rearing and house-keeping, despite what the tv ads try to portray. And we (UK) live in one of the most privileged societies in the world, millions of women aren't nearly so fortunate.
These hard-won rights are not just theirs to give away, they belong to us all, and we're not letting go. I'm sick to death of being compared to racists and homophobes, just because I'm concerned for the welfare of women and girls. If that's the only reason they can come up with for taking away our sex-based rights, they're on shaky ground. WOC and gay women agree with us too, and they're not happy at being called racist or bigoted either.
Shakespeare had male actors in female roles because women weren't allowed to act.Hardly a new member, account is months old I've just only started posting but that is irrelevant. This thread feels less 'gender discussion' and more gender rage.
In response yes I do believe that if someone thinks that drag is an adult only thing then they haven't engaged with it at all, they just see things like Rupaul or drag in clubs. For gods sake Shakespeare had drag.
On this page alone seeing people questioning boots for having a boy getting a dress. The hypocrisy of people saying womanhood isn't all dresses, make up etc and then being angry that a boy gets it as a present. Are you safeguarding gender stereotypes or relinquishing them. You can't have both.
What about pantomine dames? Not everything is sexualised, the minds of people who think these things are far more perverted than the actuality of life. Its worrying. I wouldn't let half the people who protest outside things like that near children.
Simple we are women they are trans women
All I could think of was how unwilling I’d be to lie back on my SOFA and get pissed on. Quite aside from the degradation… the upholstery!Well that was written by someone who's never been in spitting let alone pissing distance of another naked human being.