No, I understand what you're getting at. Normally it shouldn't affect anyone, and if the person is capable and good at the job , then they should get it- but the whole way the media virtue-signal box-tick over EVERYTHING now , and put it all in front of the content or programme means I can't " see around" it to get at the programme content - it's all I ' see' in front of it - so I don't bother, for the same reasons - if I'm making sense?I had all my lovely long blonde hair cut off at 11. I was a proper tomboy. It's quite a normal phase to go through but parents shouldn't then be enabling their daughters to go down the whole non binary route, it's not necessary, most girls grow out of that stage once puberty is getting to the end. Just let your daughter be a tomboy, it's fine but I guess there is no kudos in that.
There's no value in that though. This is going to make me sound horrible but I think it's Channel 4 that have a programme announcer that I think is deaf. Because he is not seen there is no value in having a wheelchair user in the role because no one can see them so they chose someone that you would know has a disability by their voice. Obviously I don't have an issue with the guy that has the job but the whole reasoning behind it fucks me off.
None of it should be an issue if they are the right people for the jobs in hand- but it is made an issue because the media push it as an issue.