Where is the proof that this is part of an ideological capture to say that men can become pregnant ?
i will bet any money that it is a Ā« one size fits all form Ā» and it is expected that everyone fill out every question so that any and all potential liabilities arising from the process are covered so the blood people are covered. Itās not gender ideology, itās liability insurance. All questions must be answered and by the person in question, in case there are any problems further down the line.
now, they could have two separate forms, but that would then increase the potential for misgendering bollocks and the uproar (and potential liability, because what happens if pregnant Freddy M takes the man form whilst pregnant, doesnāt answer that question, and Fredās blood contains hormones that are unsuitable for blood transfusions - I assume that is the issue with the question ) that arises from that.
itās not a hard question to answer. It doesnāt put him in a difficult spot. He hasnāt been pregnant in the last six months. It is not suggesting that men can get pregnant. It is certainly not forcing him to believe that men can get pregnant. He could tick Ā« no Ā» with absolutely no thought whatsoever and not advance the cause of gender ideology one iota.
Itās a blithering idiot not understanding that administrative efficiency and liability are driving this set-up, not gender ideology, and thatās what makes him a stupid gammon. No thought to the why, just the Ā« blimey, itās mad! Ā». Itās the same as when TRAs get all offended about some utter bollocks. My Dadās a similar age and Iād be embarrassed if he made a fuss about this in the blood centre, much less going whole Daily Mail Ā« sad / outraged face Ā» to the nation.