Yeah I agree. I'm a biological male and I've been asked the "are you pregnant?" question on medical forms for as long as I can remember. I genuinely don't think it has anything to do with the current ideology (which I don't agree with by the way).Where is the proof that this is part of an ideological capture to say that men can become pregnant ?
i will bet any money that it is a « one size fits all form » and it is expected that everyone fill out every question so that any and all potential liabilities arising from the process are covered so the blood people are covered. It’s not gender ideology, it’s liability insurance. All questions must be answered and by the person in question, in case there are any problems further down the line.
now, they could have two separate forms, but that would then increase the potential for misgendering bollocks and the uproar (and potential liability, because what happens if pregnant Freddy M takes the man form whilst pregnant, doesn’t answer that question, and Fred’s blood contains hormones that are unsuitable for blood transfusions - I assume that is the issue with the question ) that arises from that.
it’s not a hard question to answer. It doesn’t put him in a difficult spot. He hasn’t been pregnant in the last six months. It is not suggesting that men can get pregnant. It is certainly not forcing him to believe that men can get pregnant. He could tick « no » with absolutely no thought whatsoever and not advance the cause of gender ideology one iota.
It’s a blithering idiot not understanding that administrative efficiency and liability are driving this set-up, not gender ideology, and that’s what makes him a stupid gammon. No thought to the why, just the « blimey, it’s mad! ». It’s the same as when TRAs get all offended about some utter bollocks. My Dad’s a similar age and I’d be embarrassed if he made a fuss about this in the blood centre, much less going whole Daily Mail « sad / outraged face » to the nation.
My dentists asks me that question every other check up because there's only one form, regardless of what sex you are.
I'm all for people taking a stand on issues, but I think he picked the wrong one this time. Especially as he could have just written "N/A" in the answer column and I'm sure it would have been fine.
I'm actually surprised someone who clearly cares enough about people to donate blood would deny them over something like this. It only hurts people who need blood, not the clinic itself.