How did we as a society get into a position where this fetishist was ‘tasked with helping shape the future’ of the girl guiding movement? Where have all the checks and balances gone? Where has safeguarding gone? We are living in sick times.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
She hasn’t clocked NHS Tabitha Lots Of Names, as posted above, has she?
" Pathways was initially included in her portfolio, having previously fallen within Dr Ahmed’s brief.
It is understood that Ms Kaur Gill was preparing to raise concerns about Pathways with officials at the start of last month. At the time, the trial, which had been commissioned following the Cass review to gather data on the side effects of puberty blockers, was on hold over safety concerns.
However, she appears to have been sidelined, and by the time the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced on June 19 that Pathways could proceed with minimum age limits introduced, responsibility for the trial had passed to Baroness Merron, the minister for women’s health and mental health.
Three days later, Mr Murray told the Commons that, while he felt “discomfort and unease” at the prospect of trialling children as young as 11 on puberty-suppressing drugs, he thought “proceeding with the trial is, on balance, the most appropriate way forward”.
One Whitehall source told The Telegraph: “If this trial had stayed the responsibility of Preet Gill, she would have rightly cancelled it, at least until the child victims of the appalling Tavistock scandal had been tracked down to find out how badly damaged they are.
“Instead, in an increasingly desperate attempt to go ahead with this shocking trial, it has been taken away from her.”
Another source accused the Health Secretary of ignoring concerns not only from Ms Kaur Gill, but also from two other female health ministers said to have reservations about medicalising gender-questioning children."
archive.ph
It is understood that Ms Kaur Gill was preparing to raise concerns about Pathways with officials at the start of last month. At the time, the trial, which had been commissioned following the Cass review to gather data on the side effects of puberty blockers, was on hold over safety concerns.
However, she appears to have been sidelined, and by the time the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced on June 19 that Pathways could proceed with minimum age limits introduced, responsibility for the trial had passed to Baroness Merron, the minister for women’s health and mental health.
Three days later, Mr Murray told the Commons that, while he felt “discomfort and unease” at the prospect of trialling children as young as 11 on puberty-suppressing drugs, he thought “proceeding with the trial is, on balance, the most appropriate way forward”.
One Whitehall source told The Telegraph: “If this trial had stayed the responsibility of Preet Gill, she would have rightly cancelled it, at least until the child victims of the appalling Tavistock scandal had been tracked down to find out how badly damaged they are.
“Instead, in an increasingly desperate attempt to go ahead with this shocking trial, it has been taken away from her.”
Another source accused the Health Secretary of ignoring concerns not only from Ms Kaur Gill, but also from two other female health ministers said to have reservations about medicalising gender-questioning children."
Minister stripped of puberty blocker brief after expressing safety co…
archived 4 Jul 2026 20:15:21 UTC
This is a depraved and gruesome read even for those of us used to reading about crimes committed by people who ‘identify’ as trans. This girl first identified as a ‘boy’, then a ‘dog’. Sounds like these identities were accepted by her school/parents instead of someone stepping in and clarifying her true identity which is clearly that of a psychopath.
Just think how different things could've been if someone said No once in a while
The TIM in my craft group is tolerable as a person and I use their preferred name and avoid using pronouns as much as poss.
However this week amongst other "my trans identity is so personal but it's my entire identity" affectations (no worries about being "outed" then) they talked about their wife and had a tote bag declaring their lesbianism
However this week amongst other "my trans identity is so personal but it's my entire identity" affectations (no worries about being "outed" then) they talked about their wife and had a tote bag declaring their lesbianism
At this point, I’m labelling all straight TIM as fetishists.
He's got a proper drinker's beak on him, eh. I imagine he likes a few drinks (Malibu and Coke, nice for ladies) before he goes in looking for vulnerable women.
My husband is pretty normal, he likes the goth aesthetic (I'm not a goth) and nice lingerie but that's the extent of it.
I have a friend whose partner constantly posts women's arses in G-strings and such on facebook. He makes me sick and I can't believe she's happy about it.
they are on hormones however so I think there is a genuine transition attempt ongoing
They’re autogynophiles. They’re sexually aroused at the idea of themselves as women. They want bits they can fondle
That’s part of the fetish. He’s either an AGP (loves himself) or the humiliation fetish. Either way - keep a wide berth.
Unsure why London is having pride parade outside of the holy month of June, but the image of those tragic line dancing pink pants cowboys was so cringe I sprained an eyeball. It’s mid 2000s drag club hen do fodder and it’s embarrassing to all involved.
Three days later, Mr Murray told the Commons that, while he felt “discomfort and unease” at the prospect of trialling children as young as 11 on puberty-suppressing drugs, he thought “proceeding with the trial is, on balance, the most appropriate way forward”." Pathways was initially included in her portfolio, having previously fallen within Dr Ahmed’s brief.
It is understood that Ms Kaur Gill was preparing to raise concerns about Pathways with officials at the start of last month. At the time, the trial, which had been commissioned following the Cass review to gather data on the side effects of puberty blockers, was on hold over safety concerns.
However, she appears to have been sidelined, and by the time the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced on June 19 that Pathways could proceed with minimum age limits introduced, responsibility for the trial had passed to Baroness Merron, the minister for women’s health and mental health.
Three days later, Mr Murray told the Commons that, while he felt “discomfort and unease” at the prospect of trialling children as young as 11 on puberty-suppressing drugs, he thought “proceeding with the trial is, on balance, the most appropriate way forward”.
One Whitehall source told The Telegraph: “If this trial had stayed the responsibility of Preet Gill, she would have rightly cancelled it, at least until the child victims of the appalling Tavistock scandal had been tracked down to find out how badly damaged they are.
“Instead, in an increasingly desperate attempt to go ahead with this shocking trial, it has been taken away from her.”
Another source accused the Health Secretary of ignoring concerns not only from Ms Kaur Gill, but also from two other female health ministers said to have reservations about medicalising gender-questioning children."
Minister stripped of puberty blocker brief after expressing safety co…
archived 4 Jul 2026 20:15:21 UTC
"I know it's wrong, and there's no evidence it helps, but what the hell, let's do it anyway".
I guess he's more interested in keeping the men in dresses happy than protecting children. Well, it's a point of view I guess.
Its so frustrating to see him just like Streeting did, totally hedging bets so if its a success* they can claim credit and if its a failure they can cite that they had unease with it all and expressed such but relied on experts.
The historical data is whats needed but the reluctance to actually take steps to get it and analyse it are pathetic.
*long term it won't be but data could be skewed or misreported so it is a "success"
I'm sure they all are.
I've just seen a vid of the
parade shot from above. Not that many spectators. I'd always assumed it was quite a big thing akin to like mardi gras or something. It was more like an extended version of when our town does their carnival.I was looking up the reasons why women have a higher risk of dementia than men so I went onto the Alzheimer’s Society website to be confronted with this in the opening paragraph. bleeping hell. They don’t feel the same need to define ‘men’.
From X...
(Tempted to also post it on the politics thread!)
(Tempted to also post it on the politics thread!)
Done! Waiting for the sex deniers/Burnham fan girls (you know who they are) on the politics thread to implode 
- Status