Despite what I’m about to say I’m not actually judging her. I think in a few years she’ll be sitting down processing with a very close actual friend and saying about this comeback “what was I thinking, I was numb” so I’ll give her very much the benefit of the doubt. I don’t think bizarre behaviour after your child dies is who you actually are. I’d hold nothing against someone after this, pretty much ever. Her entire brain chemistry must have been turned inside out after that trauma.
That being said, IMO, this is an awful look. An absolutely awful look. We know social media makes money but it still falls into the realm of not looking like anything other that self serving, vacuous bull. Probably because it is, even if you make money from it, it’s not something I would ever steer my children towards. Selling your soul and privacy has always slightly disgusted me, so I’m not neutral. I don’t believe Emilie should have been selling the family’s life in the first place.
To run about making pretty videos getting coffee and ‘going antiquing’ and a load of tit after not just her child, but ‘a’ child any child that has lost his beautiful little life because of said obsession with aesthetics and image, is frankly not ok. Like be humble. It was Brady’s fault but again I’d expect nobody to have the wherewithal to end a relationship at this juncture if you’re in the depths of grief. But showing off some charmed, curated life, when it’s literally their fault that Trigg is gone, as tragic and clearly an accident that was, have some humility and keep your heads down. They’re lucky not to be in prison! I know they loved their boy and never meant for any of it to happen and they must be devastated, but carrying on like he didn’t exist when it’s their fault he’s gone is bleeping gross. If they need money send Brady out to do a 9-5. The self obsession of Emilie is like an illness, I don’t believe for one minute they need the cash right this second.