He makes a lot of sense. His error was being naive enough to think anybody would listen to his full point of view... antivaxxers and conspiracy theorists are known for taking the one bit of information that fits their narrative and running with it.It baffles me how they all love that Dr who argued with Javid.
Literally everything he says in this article goes against their theories;
Why should I be sacked for refusing the vaccine?
A few months ago, Sajid Javid was asked how he could justify sacking unvaccinated care home workers if they had been infected with Covid and had natural immunity. The Health Secretary replied as if such people were plainly idiots. ‘If they haven’t taken a vaccine — despite all the effort that’s...www.spectator.co.uk
And this article is never going to be spread as widely as a clip of him saying no to a vaccine to the health secretary. So he has done damage to the cause regardless. Also, all though it reads well, some of his science does contradict what SAGE etc is saying. And his expertise is not epidemiology and immunology.
In fact, usually he in an anesthetist, so he makes around 80-90k a year literally pumping others full of "big pharma"... which surely doesn't sit well will Ellie and her crew of dribbling knuckle draggers?
In short, he still seems like an insufferable posh bleep to me.
