You’re allowed an opinion....just one that agrees with everything she does.I just don’t get it. She puts her entire life, relationship, health and kids on line, she has strong opinions on Covid and conspiracies but No one is allowed any opinion on what she does.
I was just about to post the exact same thing!!!!I'm sure she's done this to increase engagement....if you look at previous posts on IG and Facebook her content engagement has been dire with very few comments or likes....her post today has boosted her engagementand her ego
From the Surrey Police website:Hi, been reading these threads for ages and don't usually have anything to add. But she is 100% downright lying. It's not abuse or harrasment talking about some twonk that shares their while life on social media. My hubbie works for the police and there's zero chance that anything involving them is happening. The level for abuse and harrasment where the police get involves is very high, you need to be breaking into their house and presenting a threat. The IP address is bull also as even for criminals they have to get a court order and it's a lengthy process that often leads no where as IP address aren't traceable to one peraon. Even if there was something serious happening she wouldn't post it. It's to try and scare people. The police are dealing with real crimes not hurt feelings from people on social media!If she went to my hubbie he'd politely tell her to disable her account and stop posting while trying not to tell her to fuck off they've got real work to do.
The police will be up to their eyes with death threats, child sex rings and dare I say it, important cases. A few people joking they will view a bloggers house is not top of their list.From the Surrey Police website:View attachment 233846
She should get the guy who does the voiceover for the intro/monologue to Law and Order SVU to read her post;People here were even careful not to post the (publicly available) link to her house, so that no accusations could be made. There are zero incidents of harassment or threats to her, here.
I’m wondering:
-if she has received something of this nature privately
-if the ‘false accusations’ relate to a claim made, here, a while back, by someone who claimed to know the family, to which many people said they couldn’t/wouldn’t respond, as it wasn’t something that she herself had shared, and, therefore, wasn’t appropriate
-if this is a case of ‘There is no such thing as bad publicity’ - if she holds the belief that all mentions aid a person’s cause (selling her house), even if they paint her in a bad light. She has directed a lot of new members here, today.
Surely, there has to be more to this, than the couple of innocuous posts here, last night?View attachment 233927
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?