Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

Pacho

Well-known member
Yes, but.. like a lot of people online have said, they purposely used a cliffhanger about the state of their baby (many people have figured she didn’t survive due to them not posting anything about the birth at all and then going dark for 3 weeks). It’s very manipulative to let people assume your baby has died (because no normal person wouldn’t just post something as simple as.. “baby is here and we are recovering”). They are a manipulative pair.

Of course this does mean that something is wrong with Bec and, as many predicted, it must mean her cancer is back and is likely at stage 4. It was a really really bad decision to have a baby this early after cancer remission.. just like her doctors have told her. Honestly, so selfish.
---
View attachment 2649199
I don't think it's fair to call her selfish after all she's been through. They wanted a baby. With Becs chemo they weren't even sure she could get pregnant and as someone who had 2 rounds of IVF to get pregnant every embryo doesn't mean you get a baby. I said I was relieved because I was relieved it all went well. Birth isn't easy, especially when baby is born premature. All of this talk of a baby dying is making me uncomfortable. That's a massive conclusion to come to immediately. Maybe they did do a cliff hanger, but it's also possible baby was in NICU & online was the last thing on their mind.