thedadalorian
Member
We need to build a virtual wall and have DS pay for it
Oh my god yes I remember her, there was something really strange about her.Anyone remember the poster moila? She was an unusual one.
Probably because not everyone had the same gushing opinion of them and Hearst censors everythingWhy did they close the Harry and Meghan thread? Saw it had 34 pages but now only 29 and closed.
I just had a quick glance through their Digital Spy thread - I don't think they'd be too happy with an invasion of DS members!
I still post on there regularly so something keeps drawing me back. It's easy to look back on things with rose tinted glasses but I still liked it better several years ago. Not sure what changed.I still think DS is not as bad as some make out tbh
Who were you on DS? If you don't mind me asking that is (I'm a nosy parker).I've deleted my account after 17 years, load of old horse shit.
Very true. No way is she a newbie who only joined DS in June 2020. Far too forward with her comments. When I was a newbie I wouldn't say "Boo to a goose" Let alone have big rants.I first noticed her in a thread on Shamima Begum just after she joined up and I was getting PBU vibes off her straight away. When a bolshie "new" member shows up on DS, it gives the impression that they have been there before.
It is rather pathetic of DS that one thing they aren't prepared to do is backup their moderation decisions by allowing the right to reply. This is a sure sign that they are aware that many decisions are arbitrary and not at all based on their own T&Cs.Its true that under data protection law no website is allowed to keep any information that may identify you on their servers. You can request this info to be removed and they have to, by law, comply. So the problem here is that once banned DS now ban your email from contacting them... which again is a law break. You have to be able to request any info they hold on you to be removed.
If someone made a big deal of this Hearst would be in trouble.
Can you imagine them trying to derail the Harry & Megan thread God help them.They'd get a bit of a shock that's for sure. Imagine having to read posts were people disagree and don't pander to you!!
My "quoted in the NYT" claim to fameIt sure was. A Kate Moss thread made it into the NY Times. It had really good threads and posters but now it's tripe.
Didn't realise she had "died" I always thought of her as a troll when she was posting in GD. She always reminded me of how a man pretending to be a woman would talk.I've had covid and believe me, the last thing on my mind was updating social media. It is most unpleasant.
A healthy 32yo dying of covid is rare too, I'm sure it would have made the local papers at the time.
Christ, can you imagine if Tanya came here?I wonder if all the oddballs on DS will end up coming here?
Martin R will be banned soon then !The attack hounds are circling Martin R now, he's really annoying BanglaBigot.
Expect Venetian to pop in and admonish Martin
I'm not sure if I want to be able to return. The LBC thread, which I mainly posted on, has become a cess-pit of spite. On the other hand, it might be worth it simply to annoy a lot of the current contributors when I pop up. I'm baaack!I wonder if they would have an amnesty like last time? That would be fun![]()