sadly, i totally agree with this. she's always been tiny compared to her sisters, but her legs in comparison to the twins is very jarring - her ankles look half the width of theirs. obviously malnourished and she just looks incredibly fragile - and it only seems to get worse. i hope once she returns to school, someone will notice that she's visibly at an even lower weight and actually raise concerns.Is it just me or has L lost more weight this summer hols? Just looks like bone
I actually screengrabbed this pic last night & got called away by my daughter, never got back to it then. Those little legs seem thinner than ever & the poor child is gaunt, I think the tan just defines even more how sunken her facial features are.sadly, i totally agree with this. she's always been tiny compared to her sisters, but her legs in comparison to the twins is very jarring - her ankles look half the width of theirs. obviously malnourished and she just looks incredibly fragile - and it only seems to get worse. i hope once she returns to school, someone will notice that she's visibly at an even lower weight and actually raise concerns.
View attachment 1504047
i dropped some on my bare foot the other day and got a burn, why are they letting her near it with bare hands and teaching her it’s ok to go near chemicals! What if she got into it when their backs are turned or even worse jimmy gets into it!
i doubt the safety risks even crossed their minds. they've shown previously that they have calpol and other medication shoved in the kitchen drawers, below the worktop -easily accessible to Henry and all the girls, and possibly even Jimmy. the fact that they keep medication within easy reach of young children and toddlers is scary - allowing their five year old daughter to play around with undiluted disinfectant with every chance she could splash it onto her bare skin and cause a chemical burn won't even have crossed their mind. if they're that careless with medication, they probably keep all their cleaning products within easy reach of the kids too.
£90 a week is cheapIs Jimmy three yet??
If Not, those three full days are so expensive!!
I’m guessing about easy £90 a week if not more!
Does he really need to be going to school for 3 FULL days??? Even his mum doesn’t work?
althkugh I guess if she claims she’s ‘working’ through their ‘business’ shes Entitled to30 hours paid! These sticky rules piss me off so much!
You get benefit mums who don’t work getting 30 hours funded! Funding should be for working parents so there’s more encouragement to go out to work
If I had 30 hours funded I’d go out to work and therefore pay back into the system through taxes!
Sorry off point there
Wow that’s shocking I had no idea about the medication. That’s so so dangerous! Have they not heard of high cupboards or child safety locks for drawers?i doubt the safety risks even crossed their minds. they've shown previously that they have calpol and other medication shoved in the kitchen drawers, below the worktop -easily accessible to Henry and all the girls, and possibly even Jimmy. the fact that they keep medication within easy reach of young children and toddlers is scary - allowing their five year old daughter to play around with undiluted disinfectant with every chance she could splash it onto her bare skin and cause a chemical burn won't even have crossed their mind. if they're that careless with medication, they probably keep all their cleaning products within easy reach of the kids too.
but hey, if one of the kids drank a bottle of calpol or tried to eat a laundry pod tablet, just think of all the hospital content it would create! they've proved repeatedly that content is always the priority, far above the safety adn wellbeing of their children
they’ve also both happened while intoxicated
- the younger four spent the afternoon at a birthday party, understandbly eating a buffet of standard kids' party food and cake - only for Char to immediately take them to Costa and buy them all biscuits, follows by a trip to the sweet shop! none of those are problematic in themselves, but it seems a little bit over the top to cram all of that into the space of. a few hours! after sharing a photo of Big Jim tucking into a huge selection of biscuits at the party, plus a chocolate muffin etc, you wouldn't then take the kids directly to eat iced biscuits and then to visit th sweet shop in their way home?! Yes, usually if you have a party that isn't suitable for younger kids you'd leave the others with someone else. They have plenty of family members who could have looked after them. Rather than being dragged along to watch.
Or it could teach the girls that not everything revolves around them, seeing as they're the ones that brings the money into the family
