I don’t understand it either, how could they let her have him after 5 years, and move him hours away from his dad who has been his primary caregiver? I swear she must’ve manipulated him in to saying something himself, and then maybe the dad just gave up and agreed to it if it was ‘his wishes’. She is so emotionally unhinged, how could a court say that this is in his best interests after such a long period of barely seeing her. It doesn’t make any sense. Surely it would at least be 50/50, and she would have to keep him in his home town. There has to be way more to this story.