Supposedly of course but a researcher can mean anything.Al Jazeera is just a news outlet, like Sky news or GB News.
Supposedly of course but a researcher can mean anything.Al Jazeera is just a news outlet, like Sky news or GB News.
They should do, but never will!Her baby dies and she's immediately thinking how to protect him. She only cares about him - it's disgusting.
I also think those 'anti SS' Facebook groups need to realise they are part of the reason this poor baby girl died. Their anti-authority lying bullshit has egged on this situation. Hope they're ashamed of themselves - but knowing the type that frequents these groups, they don't have the insight or emotional intelligence to realise what they've done.
Omg this is a complete jokeThey actually do.
My friend’s daughter had a social worker who supplied carpets and a large flat screen TV (an essential apparently) when she moved into a new council flat.
Also a kinship carer friend of my neighbour got passports supplied (via SS) for her grandchildren as their mother was getting married in Greece. Which I think trumped the TV.
I don’t understand how this is related to sliding doors? Sliding doors just describes a situation where if you made one decision your life would follow one path but if you made another you would be on another path, and either one will change your life foreverI don’t accept the sliding door theory for a few reasons, firstly the baby wasn’t in a car seat. Minor in all of this but basic safety on high speed roads. The witness said the baby was crying a lot and he also said the car was jam packed/dishevelled. This seems true as Gordon couldn’t get the money/passport/important items.
I doubt it because it’s not relevant as a defence for Victoria’s death.I feel like if that was the case MG’s defence would have countered it? “He didn’t refuse, they told him he had to do something that wasn’t possible.” It would be significant if they had IMO as it would play into their lack of trust for SS - if they were given impossible tasks in order to get the children back and then had the fact they couldn’t do it thrown back in their faces as refused.
BPD, do you think?Not if she was presenting as well enough to plead and refusing to disclose (or in denial of) a condition. This would fit with the periodic seeming well and unwell - that photo on the train station with one of the children on her facebook page that the papers keep using, she looks well and healthy, yet this would have been after the time she was in need of the help of a mum and baby placement and before having the children removed and after she was found living in a tent with bottles of urine.
How do you know what the poster meant?I’m not saying they do lol I’m just replying to you asking what the poster meant.
Shouldn't be allowed.The lovely Toots has changed her brief midway which hasn’t helped!![]()