My thoughts exactlyYeah but she's not going to make an enemy out of darling Charlotte, is she? Gotta keep those #presssamples rolling in
My thoughts exactlyYeah but she's not going to make an enemy out of darling Charlotte, is she? Gotta keep those #presssamples rolling in
When I scroll back through her stuff she seems authentic and less sales pushyView attachment 241917
ETA - sorry I should say, this is her response to the post from the dermatologist re tret application...
Here you go there’s more in comments
View attachment 241939
Its a bit rich caroline claiming that dr natalia is always involved in drama when caroline herself is always involved in a drama with someone and sticks her two cents in everything even if its not needed. Pot kettle black. How about she starts praticing what she preaches instead of being a hypocrite. I don't get why she called dr natalia fame hungry she herself is the epitome of someone who is fame hungry. She would try sell ice to eskimos if it meant she made money. Unlike her dr natalia has morals and standards on what advice she gives and what she recommends.View attachment 241917
ETA - sorry I should say, this is her response to the post from the dermatologist re tret application...
Here you go there’s more in comments
View attachment 241939
Oh she's definitely keen for publicity.It does seem a bit odd that she asked Caroline for a This Morning introduction previously though, and then this?
Both are attention-seeking losers who thrive on confrontation as far as I'm concerned.Oh she's definitely keen for publicity.
But at least (unlike Caroline) she has to uphold and answer to the professional standards from the British Association of Dermatologists (and the NHS?)
Is it not Caroline insinuating Dr Dray is sick and undermines her advice as per the freaks group? Speculating on people's health is just so noble.You have no qualms slagging off your colleagues who are highly regarded board-certified derms, so absolutely no reason I should be exempt.
I don't think CH is telling people how to use prescription medication but OTC retinol in her book. From what I've read she generally tends to caveat with unless you are told by your Dr/dermatologist otherwise.I love that caroline decided to go for ad hominem instead of adressing the actual argument. Deflect deflect deflect
Can't let anyone know she has no basis on giving advice on how to use prescription medication. Nothing but a glorified beauty counter sales associate who know thinks she single handidly reopened salons and brought BLM to light using her white saviour complex.
Is it not Caroline insinuating Dr Dray is sick and undermines her advice as per the freaks group? Speculating on people's health is just so noble.
View attachment 242037
That's Dr. Natalia's point. The pamphlet tells patients to not apply the tret to your eye balls, but you more than certainly can use it on the skin around your eyes.CH is actually only quoting what the manufacturers of these products say. I use prescription tret and even the literature in that states not to use around the eyes, lips or nostrils. I’m sure it is safe to do so as this Dr. Natalia says, but CH is only really qualified to quote the manufacturers own guidelines,
I'd tend to agree with this. As has been pointed out, Dr Natalia is simply the better qualified oneBoth are attention-seeking losers who thrive on confrontation as far as I'm concerned.
She’s such a bloody hypocrite.Yes, what happened to Stop, Drop & Serve, Caroline? She's only defending them because she gets a cut from any purchase using one of her codes.
I've used a Strivectin eye product which is now discontinued. It worked (it was meant for dark circles), but only as long as you are using it. Strivectin used to be kept in Harvey Nichols, so if you were anywhere near, you could try a tester because it's quite an expensive range.I’m a bit confused now - I like the sound of this eye serum, but the obvious paid partnership with CH is actually putting me off. What do you think?!