Because Blur are rit. Damon admitted he was being fake with his lad act of the 90's.
I think you've knocked the nail on the head abour ladrock and the end of Britpop. No-one goes to see a band to get piss thrown at them.I saw both Oasis and Blur live a couple of times each back in the 90s.
Much better and "rockier" atmosphere at the Oasis gigs. Once ye dodged the pints of piss being flung about!
My favourite Blue album was Leisure. I really didn't like the whole Girls and Boys/Park life/cockney lad sound.
Oasis to me were just raw energy. And it has survived over the decades. IMO anyway
I loved both bands in the 90s and still do now. Back then I loved the drama of Blur vs OasisSoooo, in the sequel of the 90s Britpop-battle, 2023 Blur doing Wembley and whatnot, Oasis doing their tour, Oasis have won. Opinions on that? Why are Oasis more sustainable than Blur?
All good, didn't read it that way!@The Yoko Ono of GY
sorry, I just realised my comment made it sound like your question was pointless!
But no! It’s an interesting discussion!![]()
Comparing Blur and Oasis is like comparing apples with oranges. Either way, Blur won the battle but Oasis won the war.I loved both bands in the 90s and still do now. Back then I loved the drama of Blur vs Oasisbut as time has gone on, I realised that both bands are so different, it’s pointless to compare them.
OutrageousMaybe she just preferred their music?![]()
Yeah, I think that's trueAnother interesting point for me is: There was a bit of a britpop-me too going on, wasn't it. When I went to see blur in 2023, it felt a bit wrong to support someone like Coxon. I never heard something as bad about the Gallaghers though (except Paul Gallagher lately). Did you? So after all it seems, the nice guy (among those lot) is not the introverted, sensitive quirky one, but the loud, arrogant, seemingly problematic ones?