Brit Pop

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Because Blur are rit. Damon admitted he was being fake with his lad act of the 90's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
The whole ladrock thing killed Britpop. Everything became very totally-out and derivative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
When I was 14, 30 years ago when the Blur vs Oasis thing was all over the news I def much preferred Blur of the two, and had a massive black and white picture of Damon sitting in a fence on my wall...

Now I find Oasis more listenable
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I saw both Oasis and Blur live a couple of times each back in the 90s.

Much better and "rockier" atmosphere at the Oasis gigs. Once ye dodged the pints of piss being flung about!

My favourite Blue album was Leisure. I really didn't like the whole Girls and Boys/Park life/cockney lad sound.

Oasis to me were just raw energy. And it has survived over the decades. IMO anyway
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I saw both Oasis and Blur live a couple of times each back in the 90s.

Much better and "rockier" atmosphere at the Oasis gigs. Once ye dodged the pints of piss being flung about!

My favourite Blue album was Leisure. I really didn't like the whole Girls and Boys/Park life/cockney lad sound.

Oasis to me were just raw energy. And it has survived over the decades. IMO anyway
I think you've knocked the nail on the head abour ladrock and the end of Britpop. No-one goes to see a band to get piss thrown at them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Soooo, in the sequel of the 90s Britpop-battle, 2023 Blur doing Wembley and whatnot, Oasis doing their tour, Oasis have won. Opinions on that? Why are Oasis more sustainable than Blur?
I loved both bands in the 90s and still do now. Back then I loved the drama of Blur vs Oasis 🤣 but as time has gone on, I realised that both bands are so different, it’s pointless to compare them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
@The Yoko Ono of GY
sorry, I just realised my comment made it sound like your question was pointless!
But no! It’s an interesting discussion! ✌🏻
All good, didn't read it that way!

I flew all the way from Austria to London in 2023 for Blur and wouldn't have done the same for Oasis in 2025. I always thought, since Blur's music evolved more, they would stand the test of time better, but at the same time, this hinders 90s nostalgia to develop as much maybe, which is big atm as we know.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 7
I loved both bands in the 90s and still do now. Back then I loved the drama of Blur vs Oasis 🤣 but as time has gone on, I realised that both bands are so different, it’s pointless to compare them.
Comparing Blur and Oasis is like comparing apples with oranges. Either way, Blur won the battle but Oasis won the war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
They were musically so different anyway, I think Oasis have more broad appeal and Blur changed what they were doing quite a lot in their later albums.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
It drove me mad at the time (and still does) that my friend was passionate about the song Common People (writing the lyrics out on every school book and bus shelter on town mainly) bought Blur (middle class
pretending to be working class) over Oasis (actual working class) . She still doesn't understand my point!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Another interesting point for me is: There was a bit of a britpop-me too going on, wasn't it. When I went to see blur in 2023, it felt a bit wrong to support someone like Coxon. I never heard something as bad about the Gallaghers though (except Paul Gallagher lately). Did you? So after all it seems, the nice guy (among those lot) is not the introverted, sensitive quirky one, but the loud, arrogant, seemingly problematic ones?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Another interesting point for me is: There was a bit of a britpop-me too going on, wasn't it. When I went to see blur in 2023, it felt a bit wrong to support someone like Coxon. I never heard something as bad about the Gallaghers though (except Paul Gallagher lately). Did you? So after all it seems, the nice guy (among those lot) is not the introverted, sensitive quirky one, but the loud, arrogant, seemingly problematic ones?
Yeah, I think that's true
I was a massive Damon fan in the 90s, but now the Internet has shown me he's a bit of a tosser.

I was an even bigger Mansun fan, and had many pictures of Paul Draper on my wall, and did go and see him when he is did solo AOTGL gigs 6 or 7 years ago.
Post that I joined some Mansun SM and discovered what a vile human he was, with all the tit with the Anchoress and couldn't bring myself to give him more money, or see his Six tour

The Gallaghers seen to be the same, nothing has come since the 90s, even Liams random twitter rants are what's expected of him rather than anything that turns me off
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Indeed, and Mark Morris from Bluetones turned out to be awful. Liam may not have been faithful to Nicole (??) Appleton for example but I don't think either of the Gallaghers turned out to be wildly different to who they've always portrayed themselves to be
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Don’t know if talking trash in public about the mother of one of your children (Liam Gallagher) counts as nice, or the borderline racist crap Noel spouted when Jay-Z was
announced to headline Glastonbury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5