Well we can disagree - that's fine. But on the face of it the child was easily able to access quite horrific things from an early teenage age. And either her mother didn't know or didn't care.
Working with vulnerable and damaged children myself, 95% of that time they are that way because of their parents. If you look at youth offenders and youth offending rates s huge majority come from backgrounds where something was lacking. The stats don't lie. I have said it before and I'll say it again, I'd be hugely surprised if X's homelife was hunky dory. She could have just been in the very small percentage of people who are born evil psychopaths, but it's also very possible (and more likely) that that isn't the case.
I am not suggesting Briannas death was her mother's fault. I am suggesting that her mother should have had a better idea of what was going through her teenage daughters head and mind. She should have been monitoring those text messages and her internet use. Let's not forget X had been excluded from school already....
Working with vulnerable and damaged children myself, 95% of that time they are that way because of their parents. If you look at youth offenders and youth offending rates s huge majority come from backgrounds where something was lacking. The stats don't lie. I have said it before and I'll say it again, I'd be hugely surprised if X's homelife was hunky dory. She could have just been in the very small percentage of people who are born evil psychopaths, but it's also very possible (and more likely) that that isn't the case.
I am not suggesting Briannas death was her mother's fault. I am suggesting that her mother should have had a better idea of what was going through her teenage daughters head and mind. She should have been monitoring those text messages and her internet use. Let's not forget X had been excluded from school already....