Bowelbro #5

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Once a fraudster, always a fraudster. These people don't change their spots, they just change the narrative to try and hide it. Very interesting that it's only now he's admitting stuff - but just enough to keep himself "innocent". There's forum posts going back years specifically naming him as stealing their rent deposits etc.

Having an illness does not make you immune to criticism and highlighting of your wrongdoings, I don't know why he seems to think it does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Once a fraudster, always a fraudster. These people don't change their spots, they just change the narrative to try and hide it. Very interesting that it's only now he's admitting stuff - but just enough to keep himself "innocent". There's forum posts going back years specifically naming him as stealing their rent deposits etc.
I still don’t believe him. Anyone can create bogus letters claiming to be from a hospital or invoices for chemo. He’s a slippery as an eel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
And this is exactly the problem scammers face when THEY have something bad happen to them. It's incredibly difficult to believe anything they say is genuine, when they've based their career off scamming innocent folk out of money and pretended someone else's work was their own.

Just to even chip away at using someone's work pics as their own. You don't think he reviewed the website before it was posted? Or went on to see what it looked like? He'd have seen it was someone else's work, why did he allow it to stay up? Because he put it there!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
Regarding the stoma photo in stained underpants. Did he write as chapter stating he had emergency surgery and was “cut wide open” or something like that that? There’s no scar to indicate being cut open?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
Not that anyone asked for them but here are my musings:

* People have different moral compasses. You feel hurt Rich because you’ve put yourself on a public platform and you’ve said and done things to raise people’s suspicions of you. Personally, I think the manipulative “I’m dying/I can’t take this/I’m going away for a while” is worse. People aren’t picking things out of thin air here and there are 100s of cancer influencers who don’t have threads.

* Many a Tattle subject has said they’ve got the police/solicitors/PIs/tech people onto Tattlers and I don’t know of one who has been successful. Even if you are a protected category, what from what has been said here that would even meet the burden of proof for civil defamation? And to bring proceedings against someone, you would of course have to know who they were. I’m guessing loads of people have tried to get Tattle to give up details and it hasn’t happened (to the best of my knowledge)

* You’ve now started acknowledging things that have been discussed here and in Reddit, which I think is a good thing - for you. There’s not a single person on the planet who hasn’t made mistakes/been young/had an undiagnosed condition. Can you see that you pushing back aggressively is what made people look into you? Do you see that your angry and manipulative attitude set this whole thing going? I would like to think if I was dying, throwing money at someone in exchange for a name wouldn’t be in the top 100 things I’d be thinking about. What are you going to do with the name - show your followers their picture and tell them what they do for a living? You make a lot of threats - you’ve said you got caught up in other people’s nefarious actions but would have happened if people thought ‘guilt by association’ and treated you the way you treat other people?

* We’re not a “cabal of freaks” here. Places like Tattle exist because it’s somewhere for people to discuss nefarious things about people in the public eye. Any time there’s any hint of someone possibly taking it off Tattle, it’s mentioned here and folk are reminded of the rules. YOU ARE CHOOSING TO read. That is what the police would say was your first mistake if you ever reported a hate crime. Do I agree with everything I read? No. Would I report things I thought went too far? Yes.

* I think you have a right to be angry given your situation but you can’t put that all onto us. Stuff has started to come out over the last few days and as a result of that, you’ve apologised. You wouldn’t do that if everything that was said here was bull. Things always come back up if they’re not dealt with.

* I think the whole GFM and platforms like it need to be regulated but that’s not because of yours. Money is obviously very important to you and I think it’s important to you that people know or think you’re rich. Money doesn’t have that same impact on me so I’m afraid I don’t understand how you associate it as a tool to get your own way.

* For the love of god man, please consider going offline. You should be spending time with your wife before anything online because it’s a colossal waste of your precious time. You can’t choose to read and then blame us for it hurting you. Many an influencer has said they don’t read, their mates tell them - if that’s you, get new mates. Nobody here wants you dead. If you lie/bend the truth about some things, folk will question other stuff too
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
The gofundme was in his public IG profile wasn’t it? Or maybe it was the charity ball. Whichever it was brought me to Tattle as he presented himself as wealthy and I was curious as to why he needed to raise money for treatment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
Regarding the stoma photo in stained underpants. Did he write as chapter stating he had emergency surgery and was “cut wide open” or something like that that? There’s no scar to indicate being cut open?
Yes that’s the problem when you tell a lie and exaggerate things it makes people not believe in you and that unfortunately is his downfall and he has NO ONE to blame only himself. Rich you could have said to your beloved friends and family if you really want to help then do a GFM for Bowelbabe and her cause to spread the word and do some good but you chose to have the money,
Which is just pure greed when as you say you’re comfortable off. Your other nasty trait Rich is your inability to reign in the blagging and constantly showing off which makes you unlikeable. Finally I’d say you need to stop with your hateful threats and threatening behaviour because that’s exactly what you’ve been met with back and you don’t like it do you ? And just because you have stage 4 cancer which isn’t always terminal I might add, it doesn’t excuse you boastful nasty personality and we don’t have to like you. You have said so many things that I’m sorry don’t always add up because you choose to Dr hop and are so vile and disrespectful to some Dr’s thinking you know best it comes across as arrogant and ignorant of what us poor plebs apparently have to deal with. Try being humble and honest if you can. You wanted to be like bowelbabe and to be some sort of influencer and it’s no coincidence the name you chose but then came the inconsistencies which we didn’t believe, that Rich is your doing so please take accountability for that. Also your a hypocrite for also having multiple accounts on Tattle, Redd and other places which are anonymous, fake so don’t then come at us saying oh this shouldn’t be allowed you should have to give your real name and details but you don’t so I rest my case. I’m not going to be a hypocrite and wish you well because I would be lying, I don’t like you or what you stand for or really see you doing much to enhance the cancer community. You lied in your book about being an alcoholic and being bought up poor and in a less than favourable area which was not true was it ? Look at yourself and I’ll look after me. Good bye
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Regarding the stoma photo in stained underpants. Did he write as chapter stating he had emergency surgery and was “cut wide open” or something like that that? There’s no scar to indicate being cut open?
It was a video. He revealed his stoma to prove he has one
---
Pot calling kettle black.

He is upset about lies being wrote about him? Meanwhile just today he is still spinning lies.
He says someone betrayed him on his PERSONAL IG and pinched photographs.
The photos in question are there on his non public bowelbro IG profile. Had been there for months.
---
I'm actually happy for Rich that the book aint going anywhere near Waterstones. God forbid how he would feel if he got the negative feedback that many books get.
I purchase biography books myself and will always get asked what I am reading? Would I recommend it? What I thought of it? People talk, its natural.
The crying nurse nuzzling her head into a patients neck, it didn't happen... Only in fiction books and scenes from Mills & Boon.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 10
He has lied and he has exaggerated. He’s not a likeable character whatsoever, drama follows drama and all that! I think it’s absolutely tragic that he sits online refreshing tattle all day, it’s such a sad existence.
I’d also like to know why he never speaks on here to us? He has stuck up for himself on Reddit, Twitter but never here despite having multiple accounts. Strange isn’t it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
He has lied and he has exaggerated. He’s not a likeable character whatsoever, drama follows drama and all that! I think it’s absolutely tragic that he sits online refreshing tattle all day, it’s such a sad existence.
I’d also like to know why he never speaks on here to us? He has stuck up for himself on Reddit, Twitter but never here despite having multiple accounts. Strange isn’t it
I’d be interested to know when he signed up too (for any additional profiles) as I think the referral code has been on the go for a while. It would be a real plot twist if he knew a load of Tattlers and they gave him codes 😂
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 10
I’d be interested to know when he signed up too (for any additional profiles) as I think the referral code has been on the go for a while. It would be a real plot twist if he knew a load of Tattlers and they gave him codes 😂
I think he probably gave himself a code and gained multiple accounts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
The GFM protests don’t sit comfortably with me. If it was only about donations from close friends and family, no different to a family member sending another family member money, there would be no need to register a domain name and create a website with two very clear calls to action encouraging donations. There would also be no need to involve a PR company, as the very nature of their work is to handle messaging to the press. I’ve donated to plenty of GFMs for friends over the years and none sought publicity like that. I don’t know about you, but I don’t need to read about my family or friends in the local newspaper to want to help.

On top of that, there was no disclaimer in any of the wording shared with the general public that indicated that Rich is wealthy and the GFM was set up as a gesture for a mate to use as he pleases. Far from it, it says that Avastin is not available on the NHS and Rich is self-employed, which implies that without fundraising, it would be a treatment out of reach to Rich. That is certainly how I, as an outsider, interpret it. I am not jealous, I simply find it distasteful to allow a fundraiser to be publicised in that way when, by his own admission, he can afford his own treatment. He isn’t a labourer, his earnings are not affected by his illness as they would be if he was a self-employed bricklayer, for example. From the booking page for the gala: “All proceeds are donated directly to Richards cancer treatments and care.”

I am dubious that only £1500 of donations came from sources that weren’t friends and family. £2000 alone came from the Bowel Movement. So even when protesting his innocence, Rich can’t help but lie. I can’t stand people who lie, particularly when they are playing the woe is me card. If he lies about that, what else is he prepared to lie about?

No one is targeting Rich because he has cancer, they have taken issue with inconsistencies and tasteless bragging. When you then combine that with the string of businesses with no accounts, plus the Romeo Bater debacle, it makes him seem quite unsavoury. I also dislike that he uses his diagnosis as a reason why he mustn’t be criticised. He hasn’t changed his ways because he continues to be dishonest, even when gravely ill. That is a true opportunist, not someone who is genuinely remorseful for previous misdemeanours.

From the involvement of a PR company upon diagnosis to checking Tattle and Reddit day and night for mentions while terminally ill, Rich is obsessed with his image, but it is his own dishonesty and desperation for adulation which has led to people questioning his motives. No amount of aggressive outbursts and threats to hunt me down and get me locked up will change my opinion because I don’t like liars, especially not ones with an anger problem. Rich should focus on his family and go offline as a previous poster suggested to make the most of the time he has left.
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 17
The GFM protests don’t sit comfortably with me. If it was only about donations from close friends and family, no different to a family member sending another family member money, there would be no need to register a domain name and create a website with two very clear calls to action encouraging donations. There would also be no need to involve a PR company, as the very nature of their work is to handle messaging to the press. I’ve donated to plenty of GFMs for friends over the years and none sought publicity like that. I don’t know about you, but I don’t need to read about my family or friends in the local newspaper to want to help.

On top of that, there was no disclaimer in any of the wording shared with the general public that indicated that Rich is wealthy and the GFM was set up as a gesture for a mate to use as he pleases. Far from it, it says that Avastin is not available on the NHS and Rich is self-employed, which implies that without fundraising, it would be a treatment out of reach to Rich. That is certainly how I, as an outsider, interpret it. I am not jealous, I simply find it distasteful to allow a fundraiser to be publicised in that way when, by his own admission, he can afford his own treatment. He isn’t a labourer, his earnings are not affected by his illness as they would be if he was a self-employed bricklayer, for example. From the booking page for the gala: “All proceeds are donated directly to Richards cancer treatments and care.”

I am dubious that only £1500 of donations came from sources that weren’t friends and family. £2000 alone came from the Bowel Movement. So even when protesting his innocence, Rich can’t help but lie. I can’t stand people who lie, particularly when they are playing the woe is me card. If he lies about that, what else is he prepared to lie about?

No one is targeting Rich because he has cancer, they have taken issue with inconsistencies and tasteless bragging. When you then combine that with the string of businesses with no accounts, plus the Romeo Bater debacle, it makes him seem quite unsavoury. I also dislike that he uses his diagnosis as a reason why he mustn’t be criticised. He hasn’t changed his ways because he continues to be dishonest, even when gravely ill. That is a true opportunist, not someone who is genuinely remorseful for previous misdemeanours.

From the involvement of a PR company upon diagnosis to checking Tattle and Reddit day and night for mentions while terminally ill, Rich is obsessed with his image, but it is his own dishonesty and desperation for adulation which has led to people questioning his motives. No amount of aggressive outbursts and threats to hunt me down and get me locked up will change my opinion because I don’t like liars, especially not ones with an anger problem. Rich should focus on his family and go offline as a previous poster suggested to make the most of the time he has left.
This is a very well thought out reply. Thank you, you’re absolutely right in everything that you say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
* You’ve now started acknowledging things that have been discussed here and in Reddit, which I think is a good thing - for you. There’s not a single person on the planet who hasn’t made mistakes/been young/had an undiagnosed condition. Can you see that you pushing back aggressively is what made people look into you? Do you see that your angry and manipulative attitude set this whole thing going? I would like to think if I was dying, throwing money at someone in exchange for a name wouldn’t be in the top 100 things I’d be thinking about. What are you going to do with the name - show your followers their picture and tell them what they do for a living? You make a lot of threats - you’ve said you got caught up in other people’s nefarious actions but would have happened if people thought ‘guilt by association’ and treated you the way you treat other people?

* We’re not a “cabal of freaks” here. Places like Tattle exist because it’s somewhere for people to discuss nefarious things about people in the public eye. Any time there’s any hint of someone possibly taking it off Tattle, it’s mentioned here and folk are reminded of the rules. YOU ARE CHOOSING TO read. That is what the police would say was your first mistake if you ever reported a hate crime. Do I agree with everything I read? No. Would I report things I thought went too far? Yes.
Yes that’s the problem when you tell a lie and exaggerate things it makes people not believe in you and that unfortunately is his downfall and he has NO ONE to blame only himself.
He has lied and he has exaggerated. He’s not a likeable character whatsoever, drama follows drama and all that! I think it’s absolutely tragic that he sits online refreshing tattle all day, it’s such a sad existence.
Rich is obsessed with his image, but it is his own dishonesty and desperation for adulation which has led to people questioning his motives. No amount of aggressive outbursts and threats to hunt me down and get me locked up will change my opinion because I don’t like liars, especially not ones with an anger problem.
Agree with all of the above. IMO, I have to give him props for expending a lot of time and energy trying to clear the air with what "sounded" like a comprehensive recounting, with some humility and possibly honest reflection of past events, from his perspective, hitting many many questions we've encountered and raised.

He lost me again at the threats and name calling, though. I cannot fathom why he believes he's on any higher moral ground if you were to lay each record side by side and compare them all.

I hope he brings a portfolio to the police that also includes a record of his own conduct, calling Tattlers paedophiles and the like, including the threats he's made. The police might like to have a look at his online and I daresay threatening behaviour, too. I do have respect for the effort to disclose and explain, though, and try to clear the air.

My thanks to @Saydee for being our messenger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
The GFM protests don’t sit comfortably with me. If it was only about donations from close friends and family, no different to a family member sending another family member money, there would be no need to register a domain name and create a website with two very clear calls to action encouraging donations. There would also be no need to involve a PR company, as the very nature of their work is to handle messaging to the press. I’ve donated to plenty of GFMs for friends over the years and none sought publicity like that. I don’t know about you, but I don’t need to read about my family or friends in the local newspaper to want to help.

On top of that, there was no disclaimer in any of the wording shared with the general public that indicated that Rich is wealthy and the GFM was set up as a gesture for a mate to use as he pleases. Far from it, it says that Avastin is not available on the NHS and Rich is self-employed, which implies that without fundraising, it would be a treatment out of reach to Rich. That is certainly how I, as an outsider, interpret it. I am not jealous, I simply find it distasteful to allow a fundraiser to be publicised in that way when, by his own admission, he can afford his own treatment. He isn’t a labourer, his earnings are not affected by his illness as they would be if he was a self-employed bricklayer, for example. From the booking page for the gala: “All proceeds are donated directly to Richards cancer treatments and care.”

I am dubious that only £1500 of donations came from sources that weren’t friends and family. £2000 alone came from the Bowel Movement. So even when protesting his innocence, Rich can’t help but lie. I can’t stand people who lie, particularly when they are playing the woe is me card. If he lies about that, what else is he prepared to lie about?

No one is targeting Rich because he has cancer, they have taken issue with inconsistencies and tasteless bragging. When you then combine that with the string of businesses with no accounts, plus the Romeo Bater debacle, it makes him seem quite unsavoury. I also dislike that he uses his diagnosis as a reason why he mustn’t be criticised. He hasn’t changed his ways because he continues to be dishonest, even when gravely ill. That is a true opportunist, not someone who is genuinely remorseful for previous misdemeanours.

From the involvement of a PR company upon diagnosis to checking Tattle and Reddit day and night for mentions while terminally ill, Rich is obsessed with his image, but it is his own dishonesty and desperation for adulation which has led to people questioning his motives. No amount of aggressive outbursts and threats to hunt me down and get me locked up will change my opinion because I don’t like liars, especially not ones with an anger problem. Rich should focus on his family and go offline as a previous poster suggested to make the most of the time he has left.
Even then he can’t help himself I am loved by my friends and family and I’m loved by my wife. Again he needs to make sure we all know and he has to validate himself. He thinks money will buy him anything and again today I’ll give you two grand know questions asked 🤢 how distasteful is that. Would people have donated if they knew he was so wealthy?! I think not, especially the Bowel Movement that really upsets me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Even then he can’t help himself I am loved by my friends and family and I’m loved by my wife. Again he needs to make sure we all know and he has to validate himself. He thinks money will buy him anything and again today I’ll give you two grand know questions asked 🤢 how distasteful is that. Would people have donated if they knew he was so wealthy?! I think not, especially the Bowel Movement that really upsets me.
What did he say he would give two grand for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.