A while back Rich mentioned he’d hired the best cyber forensic detective out there to find out who we all were (sorry might have the terminology wrong). And I was inspired! If someone like that could find us, what could they find out about him? And how do they even do it?
To cut a long story short, because it’ll take me ages to type it all out, here are some inconsistencies.
On the 23rd December 2022, his oncologist said he can never have Avastin again. I quote “he says I can no longer ever, ever have it again”). Just this week he supposedly took Avastin.
He supposedly had an anaphylactic reaction to chemo this week and was then allowed have chemo again at home? Doesn’t happen. He is photographed in an ambulance supposedly for an anaphylactic reaction. That suggests it happened within the last hour. No swelling, no redness, alert and able for a photo? Doesn’t happen.
Signed a contract on 18th January with his book publishers, to release his book in all good retailers in May. He negotiated with his publishers that it will be available on kindle and also on audio book. He also told us in January that a book buyer from Tesco got in touch with him to get his publishers to get touch with the Marketing Manager of Tesco as they want to het the book on shelves in Quarter 2 (which started over a week ago). End of Feb the book was going off for editing and layout etc. and would be released in May. If he signed a contract, that is a legally binding document. He then did a pre release thing (don’t know what to call it) and PayPal flagged customers payments as suspicious and fraudulent. Almost as if they payments were going to a personal account. No mention of who the publishers are anywhere, not on the book cover, the post nor the website.
In October 2022 he tells us he has four cancerous lesions on his liver. Then NGH say they’re not cancerous after all. That’s goes quiet for a while.
In December 2022 NGH tell him it’s not in the liver; Cleveland clinic say it is. These lesions are 2cm big.
Then he learns on the 23rd December he learns that his stability has been lost; cancer has grown by a third with the most significant growth in the liver. It’s now definitely in the liver with FOUR tumours present.
Suddenly in January the consensus is he’s stable (and now they say he’s been stable for 7 months). He tells the BBC this month that his cancer is classed as incurable and terminal. He says he hasn’t had chemo in 13 weeks (though he had it in October…)
Skip to Feb 2023. At this point he’s told he’s been stable for 9 months and if that continues for just 6 more weeks (why?) he can have surgery (so April). But THEN he learns he has TWO marks on his liver (I mean, these have been referenced before but anyway). NGH say it’s cancer. He says the cleveland clinic says it’s not. A leading expert in his field says it’s a birth mark. He has a new cutting edge bubble scan and it confirms he has it in his liver.
He disappears in March and returns in April and reminds us about these two marks. Now he says that NGH had said they weren’t cancer. He went to NGH and showed them the proof they were and they allegedly told him they’re sorry, there’s nothing they can do so go home. He is now no longer under the care of NGH. He had another scan and it shows NINE tumours in the liver, 25 in his abdomen. And now he’s back on chemo (Avastin) and under another new doctor called Dr Gaya.
That’s just a snippet, and you can make your own minds up. I’ve no idea what to believe. And all the above is literally just what Richard Davies has posted on Instagram.
But one thing that surprises me is his bag of saline has no label with his name stuck on the bag. Jokes, we all know saline is nothing special so conveniently needs no patient confirmation details on it. There are so many more inconsistencies but it’s too long to type. But I hope there’s something somewhere that we can class as a ‘significant find’ lol
he quickly got bored and missed his 'squad' didn't he.
!
are so dense they don’t question him at all. Are they all still blowing hot air up his 