This video is saying it's all about getting a cut of the Disney + monthly membership (and she is getting a wedge of the $30 per rent view) because the movie drove subs. If F9 performed about the same at the cinema and wasn't available to stream it does seem difficult to say it underperformed in the cinema in the new covid world.
It is a very fascinating case with lots to consider beyond the headlines that simplify it. The most interesting legal case in entertainment.
Hopefully it does go to court and all the private Disney numbers get out there.
This comment kinda sums up my thoughts:
People seem to be mindlessly jumping on the 'evil Disney' bandwagon and backing Scarlett. Yes, Disney is a highly questionable corporation but Scarlett Johansson is also far from a beacon of moral virtue. The one thing Disney and Scarlett have in common is their cut-throat attitude aimed towards earning as much money as possible. Let's not forget Scarlett Johansson chose to support Israeli Apartheid over Oxfam, has said she deserves to play any race she wants to, stood up for Woody Allen (bizarrely whilst also supporting the Women's March). I'm not rooting for her, at all.
It is a very fascinating case with lots to consider beyond the headlines that simplify it. The most interesting legal case in entertainment.
Hopefully it does go to court and all the private Disney numbers get out there.
This comment kinda sums up my thoughts:
People seem to be mindlessly jumping on the 'evil Disney' bandwagon and backing Scarlett. Yes, Disney is a highly questionable corporation but Scarlett Johansson is also far from a beacon of moral virtue. The one thing Disney and Scarlett have in common is their cut-throat attitude aimed towards earning as much money as possible. Let's not forget Scarlett Johansson chose to support Israeli Apartheid over Oxfam, has said she deserves to play any race she wants to, stood up for Woody Allen (bizarrely whilst also supporting the Women's March). I'm not rooting for her, at all.