BBC3 tattle documentary by fullfattv

New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Don’t do as I do, Tattlers, do as I say.
Probably all scheduled to do a mildly controversial post to boost her reach to charge more money for upcoming brand deals.

So transparent with this faux I'm gonna be cancelled for this. 🙄

The tab repeated not a medical Dr jessica Taylor's sick claims about Princess Dickson as if they were true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11
Chatting out her a again. Show us the tattle comments telling people to kill themselves, Princess’ inquest stating tattle killed her and leaked addresses Grace x
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Heart
Reactions: 13
Oh she says allegedly. Presumably she thinks by saying that, it means she cant be held accountable for her nasty ill informed opinions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Chatting out her a again. Show us the tattle comments telling people to kill themselves, Princess’ inquest stating tattle killed her and leaked addresses Grace x View attachment 4089670
The irony is didn’t the featured Tattler from the doc pop up on this thread a few weeks ago defending Tattle and saying that whilst it didn’t make the cut, GK *agreed* with her on-camera? The doc cherry-picked two stories.

Also the irony of seeking out the Tattle owner’s address for the sake of a documentary and then having the audacity to accuse the site of leaking people’s addresses… I’ve never once seen anybody’s address get leaked. Ever. Nor have I ever seen a comment telling anybody to kill themselves.

Can she name *one* instance of a Tattle user leaking somebody’s address? Or of any suicide threats? Because I’ve never seen any…

Also “a website people have killed themselves from allegedly”… how dare she pin all the blame on the tragic death of a young teenage girl, on a website? And then throwing in an allegedly to try and cover her back…

I’m sure some people have had mental health issues over comments from Facebook or Twitter- does that mean those platforms (which are unmoderated by the way, unlike here) should be shut down too?

I’ve seen a few comments I think have gone a bit far (especially about some of the cancer influencers and allegations that they’re faking it… I think that’s low but posts and threads that cross a line *do* thankfully get removed) but not one comment giving somebody’s address away.

Indeed there’s been a few influencers that Tattle has called out because they’ve accidentally posted their kids’ school address etc- Tattle hasn’t done that, the influencers themselves have and nobody ever screenshots the addresses to post here. We just say “this idiot’s posted their children’s school address”…. I think we show a lot more concern for safeguarding than the influencers do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Chatting out her a again. Show us the tattle comments telling people to kill themselves, Princess’ inquest stating tattle killed her and leaked addresses Grace x
View attachment 4089670
Wow! Where is one single post telling someone to kill themselves let alone representing it happens frequently?

It could have slipped under the net in the 25'000'000 posts of user generated content, but tattle is wanting to know and ban anyone that does that.

There was one post several years ago saying katie price should end her life, in the context of reckless driving that wrote off a car while high, the poster was banned and post deleted very quickly. That's the worst I've ever seen on here, and it's the kind of comment that is easily found on Meta or X.

I'm sure I've addressed the truth behind "leaking influencers addresses" many many times, but I'll say it again as all those wanting to smear tattle live on repeating it. Occasionally there has been a link to someones home listing and tattle always deletes it quickly when anyone reports and there are several things in place to automatically stop something like this ever going live. But influencers themselves make sharing their home their work. They are the ones putting out information about their home. No one has ever shared a home listing with malicious intents, it's always been out of interest. If they didn't share their moving in journeys or home renovation no one would be nosey about their home.

She should be ashamed of her so called documentary. They only showed the claims of the two influencers picked, with GK asking loaded questions rather than any attempt to be unbiased. When there is over 10'000+ posts on each of them it's very easy to select snippets of 20-30 posts to tell the story you want to tell. They cherry picked a couple of posts, edited them and showed out of context to mislead the audience. Then engaged in stalking of pensioners at an address they knew SB didn't live at in order to add some drama to a very dry, biased hit job on a site that is a thorn in influencers side because they can't get away with lying.

GK Barry is showing herself to be dishonest and deceitful.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 36
Actual examples that have happened countless times:

Tattler: "She shouldn't post the children in their school uniform, it makes it easy to find out where they go to school"
Influencer: "They doxxed my child's school!!"

Tattler: "I wish there were laws to stop influencers posting their children in swimwear, it's well known these end up on the dark web"
Influencer: "They're pedophiles talking about my children in swimwear!!"

But the press and media will only ever say tattle is vile trolling.

Influencers get stupid Labour MPs to sign letters saying the people whistleblowing on influencers need to be shut down ASAP. MPs don't even ask for an investigation or research into it. They demand tattle is shut down immediately. Grim all round. They take the word of a dangerous social media grifter ( https://kerrydaynes.substack.com/p/click-lie-repeat-inside-the-claims ). Very worrying how they can be tricked by malicious people or entities .
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 35
The other thing is that they never ask for, say, Twitter to be shut down even with the very well documented issues they've had in all sorts of directions (not least the pronouncements of the owner!)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
Wow! Where is one single post telling someone to kill themselves let alone representing it happens frequently?

It could have slipped under the net in the 25'000'000 posts of user generated content, but tattle is wanting to know and ban anyone that does that.

There was one post several years ago saying katie price should end her life, in the context of reckless driving that wrote off a car while high, the poster was banned and post deleted very quickly. That's the worst I've ever seen on here, and it's the kind of comment that is easily found on Meta or X.

I'm sure I've addressed the truth behind "leaking influencers addresses" many many times, but I'll say it again as all those wanting to smear tattle live on repeating it. Occasionally there has been a link to someones home listing and tattle always deletes it quickly when anyone reports and there are several things in place to automatically stop something like this ever going live. But influencers themselves make sharing their home their work. They are the ones putting out information about their home. No one has ever shared a home listing with malicious intents, it's always been out of interest. If they didn't share their moving in journeys or home renovation no one would be nosey about their home.

She should be ashamed of her so called documentary. They only showed the claims of the two influencers picked, with GK asking loaded questions rather than any attempt to be unbiased. When there is over 10'000+ posts on each of them it's very easy to select snippets of 20-30 posts to tell the story you want to tell. They cherry picked a couple of posts, edited them and showed out of context to mislead the audience. Then engaged in stalking of pensioners at an address they knew SB didn't live at in order to add some drama to a very dry, biased hit job on a site that is a thorn in influencers side because they can't get away with lying.

GK Barry is showing herself to be dishonest and deceitful.
I think it's all to do with intent and policy.
Sure the occasional awful comment might appear on Tattle, or something verging on doxxing - but are those comments allowed to stay? Are they laughed at and endlessly requoted with approval? No. They're deleted and there is often a warning.
That shows the culture here is not to encourage doxxing, suicide harm, child abuse (for duck sake).

But I could be on Tattle for hours/days looking for harmful/offensive/racist material and not find any. I guarantee two minutes on X I'd find death threats, doxxing, racism, anti semitism - you name it. FB isn't much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
The BBC are standing by the "documentary". They think that it was just fine to go to the bloke's parents' house and to talk about the suicide of a young girl who had nothing to do with Tattle.

FFS.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sick
Reactions: 19
I got the same, no suprise they mark their own homework. As per the email I'm taking it to the next level - Executive Complaints Unit.

It was biased, unaccurate and there is no need to hang about at the drive of pensioners that have nothing to do with the site. Trashy tabloid reporting is not what the BBC was setup to do.

There's an American podcast that spoke about it (paywalled but I think they do a free trail https://www.blockedandreported.org/p/premium-jessica-taylors-tattle-battle) and they said this

2: The BBC aired this after the kid killed herself?
1: Yeah.
2: Or before?
1: Yeah.
2: I mean, that's a little ducked up too. The kid kills herself, and then you have the mom saying, "This is why it happened." I didn't watch the whole segment. And then the BBC just— this really, like, uh.
1: Spurs an attack.
2: Spurs the idea that there's a— yeah, which, again, like, yeah, I don't— I don't— well, this was not a good decision on the BBC's part, unless I'm missing something.
1: Right. Right, and on the scale of internet bullying, this did not rank particularly high.
2: Precisely.
1: Yeah. Now, was it Tattle that caused or even contributed to Princess— Princess's death? I don't know. This is under investigation. It's still open. But Sophie Mae Dixon, she publicly named Tattle as the killer, and she was supported in this by Jessica Taylor, who is calling on Parliament to shut this site down.

2: Who— who did they get killed, according to Jessica Taylor?
1: Okay, so the one person she names is a 16-year-old named Princess Bliss, whose mom was something of a wannabe influencer. It's a sad story. So, Kathleen Stark, she described the situation in a piece in UnHerd. So, Jesse, please read this.
2: Oh God. "Aged 4, Princess was featured in a 2014 television documentary getting a spray tan. The show was about mothers, including her own, Sophie Mae Dixon, who would painfully tease hair weaves into their tiny daughters' curls." I see why this is a Kathleen Stark story. "Dressed them in elaborate frills and furbelos?"
1: Furbelos?
2: What's that word?
1: I don't— I don't know.
2: Furbelo. Furbello. Someone's going to be a jerk to me that I don't know that word.
1: I bet it's like—
2: You can't— I don't know every word. You can't know every word.
1: It's true.
2: "And cover them in makeup and glitter. Some comic genius at Channel 5 called the show 'Blinging Up Baby'." Jesus. This feels very American to you. We export them all our— all our tit.
1: It does, yeah.
2: "Gleeful pieces in the tabloids followed, and a year later the mother also appeared on This Morning to discuss the excessive pampering of her two girls. The dye seemed to be cast. From then on, Princess Bliss and her sister would be turned into living dolls full-time, and when television ceased to be interested, Sophie Mae's social media accounts would take up the slack." I got to say, based on what I've read so far, it— it sounds like this poor girl ends up dead. It sounds like there's a lot of potential reasons for that. That might not have to do with anything that happened on Tattle, but continue. Tell me more.
1: Right. So this is the kind of parenting that posters on snark forums like Tattle and Momsnet and Reddit tend to be very judgmental of. They see using kids as content, using your kids to get attention, as exploitation. And Sophie Mae definitely used her daughters for content, and then they became content creators themselves. So in February this year, after Princess died, Sophie Mae, the mom, she blamed online bullying, specifically Tattle.
2: Was it suicide?
1: It was suicide, yeah.
2: I mean, that— I can't imagine losing a kid to suicide, but like, maybe look in the mirror a little bit in terms of contributing factors. But did Princess— I can imagine— I just, based on what you've told me about Tattle so far, I can much more see them ridiculing Sophie Mae than Princess. Did they have a threat on Princess or make fun of her?
1: You're exactly right. They talked about Princess and her sister, whose name I believe was Precious, occasionally, but the thread was about Sophie Mae. And Sophie Mae says that Princess would read the posts and see people saying horrible things, not just about Mom, but about her.
2: I feel like this gets back to, like, the gender divide in snark communities. A male snark community, I could see, viciously going after the teenage victim of a mom exploitation scheme. Tattle, sounds like, is not that demographic. But what—
1: Do they have— what sort of, like, male snark forums are there?
2: I mean, Kiwi Farms.
1: I mean, Kiwi Farmses, yeah.
2: Although, no, isn't it— you know what, I— even Kiwi Farms, and probably—
1: It's got— it's got some girly vibes.
2: Well, but I was going to say, even they, I think, in this case, would focus their ire on the mom.
1: Okay, so I want to turn to the BBC for a second. So there's a British influencer and media personality named GK Barry. She was also a subject on Tattle, and the BBC hired her to host this documentary episode they called "Talks of Gossip." I want to watch a clip from that. This starts with GK Barry asking Sophie Mae a question. Jesse, they're going to show screenshots of the things people said about Princess Dixon on Tattle, and I want you to read those as this plays.
2: This is what I was hoping you'd ask me to do, is read me comments about a dead teenager. Thank you, Katie.
3: Teenager, yeah. If you can stop yourself from saying anything about Sophie Mae's appearance, well, I congratulate you.
4: When did you become aware that she was reading it?
2: I'll never forget. We had a takeaway this one time, and she was, like, eating extra chutneys, and telling me she's eating extra chutneys. And I always say to my children, if you can't talk to me about an issue, if you feel embarrassed or you feel whatever, write it down and then tell Mommy that way.
4: Okay.
1: And yeah, she's written— there was a statement thing saying how skinny I was, and I will have an eating disorder, which is why I'm trying to eat more.
2: Okay, so we're looking at— on the right, they have video of— that's the daughter, right? Princess?
1: Yeah.
2: Looking at herself on the phone. And then one of the comments says, "She's too slim. Her arm. Why is Princess wearing heels that look like stripper heels? It was making me feel sick watching her. Dressed like tacky prostitute dolls. The oldest one looks dead behind the eyes. weird ducklings." Okay, wait, they are— they are making fun of her appearance.
1: Yeah.
2: I mean, it's like— I think by— by the standards of internet stuff and the kinds of stuff you will be exposed to if your mom makes you a reality TV star, it's fairly mild, but undeniably, some people were making fun of her appearance.
1: Yeah, so that's the sort of thing people said about Princess. Not something I would kill myself over, but I'm not a 16-year-old girl reading what strangers say about me on the internet. And—
2: Sure, but again, I'm not trying to belabor the point, but why was she reading about stuff strangers said about her on the internet?
1: Right, right. I mean, well, I mean—
2: Although I guess by then she was old enough she could have been on the internet herself.
1: Oh, she was. She was a content creator.
2: Well, but she— but she— sure. Okay, yeah, it's not— look, it's horrible. I don't want to—
1: Yeah. So I wanted to know if the comments that the BBC displayed, if those were representative of what people said about Princess, if they were the worst of it. So I got a text file of every post in the Sophie Mae Dixon threads. This included the posts of her daughters. That was pretty— like, that— like, what they showed on the BBC was pretty much the worst of it.
2: Yeah.
1: What I saw, much more than criticism or hate, was concern. Some of it— like, one read, "Hate to say it, and I want to make it clear it is not the kids' fault," but they're literally, clearly, little slags in the making, crying face emojis. So that was kind of the cruelest sort of stuff, but again, it's, like, mostly directed at the mom.
2: The BBC aired this after the kid killed herself?
1: Yeah.
2: Or before?
1: Yeah.
2: I mean, that's a little ducked up too. The kid kills herself, and then you have the mom saying, "This is why it happened." I didn't watch the whole segment. And then the BBC just— this really, like, uh.
1: Spurs an attack.
2: Spurs the idea that there's a— yeah, which, again, like, yeah, I don't— I don't— well, this was not a good decision on the BBC's part, unless I'm missing something.
1: Right. Right, and on the scale of internet bullying, this did not rank particularly high.
2: Precisely.
1: Yeah. Now, was it Tattle that caused or even contributed to Princess— Princess's death? I don't know. This is under investigation. It's still open. But Sophie Mae Dixon, she publicly named Tattle as the killer, and she was supported in this by Jessica Taylor, who is calling on Parliament to shut this site down.
2: I mean, okay, this is— this is just normal. It's just, like, we saw this in the wake of the Arday stuff. They just do not have the same culture.
1: Right.
2: As our infallible culture of free speech here.
1: So there was another case featured in the BBC show that I wanted to mention. So there was a guy— a British guy named Richard Davies, who was diagnosed with bowel cancer in his 30s. He started posting about this. He became a cancer influencer. He posted about his treatment. He raised money. Some of the Tattle users thought he was a grifter and a liar, and they thought he was misusing the funds, and they straight-up did not believe he was sick. There were a lot of posts on the site about he was faking it. While he was sick and he died, some of them still don't believe it. And his wife said on the BBC show that after he died, she got a card in the mail saying, "Howdy, witch, conning money out of vulnerable people. Karma is a witch."
2: Ugh. That's really weird.
1: Yeah, it's really weird. This is a grooving widow, and some mole is kicking her at the worst moments of her life. It's really weird. But was this particular Tattle user— I don't know. I don't think he or she put their username on the envelope. In the BBC show—
2: Tattle— Tattle sent me, witch.
1: Right. In the BBC show, they implied that this was for sure a Tattle user. No one on Tattle took credit for it. And in fact, Richard Davies appears to have had some enemies, so there were rumors about financial improprieties. To be clear, I have no idea if those rumors are true. As far— as far as I'm aware, no criminal charges were ever filed against him. But six months before he had a Tattle thread, right after he was diagnosed with cancer, there was a report in the news that his house was broken into three times in a week, his things were thrown in a driveway, and then pissed on.
2: A lot of this reminds me how during the Kiwi Farms— peak of the Kiwi Farms brew haha with Kefals, and then with, um, the Liz Fong-Jones stuff is ongoing, and I think we'll discuss it at some point. There were these moments where a figure like Kefals would just be the character of the day on the internet, and then people assumed that anything bad that happened to her.
1: Yes.
2: Came from Kiwi Farms, which is impossible to say. Now, it allows plausible deniability if someone from Kiwi Farms does touch the poo. But in the case of Kefals, like, I had found evidence to suggest it might have been coming from elsewhere that everyone just sort of ignored.
1: Yeah.
2: Like, I think— in other words, I think, like, internet culture reporters and other people who are internet native understand that, like, look, you're the character of the day. A lot of people are going to send horrible tit to you. You can't necessarily pin it on one community however obnoxious that community is.
1: The same thing happens with Patrick Tomlinson, probably the most harassed man on the internet. His, you know, stalkers insist that the doxing and all of the in-person harassment is not coming from the Obie and Anthony forums. Logically, it makes sense that it's coming from these forums, unless you actually know the identity of the person who's doing it and connect it to a username. It's really impossible to tell. And so we don't know if this card sent to this grieving widow was from a toddler or from someone else who hated her husband. Maybe it was from the guy who pissed on his stuff. But it is undoubtedly true that Tattle was a hub of speculation and rumor wrongering about Richard Davies and his cancer.
2: Sure.
1: And when his wife reached out to Sebastian Bond to ask him to take the threads down, she says she never heard back.
2: So does— is that a— Kiwi Farms has a general policy of not taking stuff down when people complain. Does Tattle have that same policy?
1: Yeah, not without a court order. So Sebastian Bond will delete individual posts if they violate the rules, but he told me he really can't delete whole threads at this point because then the people who are trying to get the site shut down can just say whatever they want about it, and there will be no record to check.
2: Gotcha.
1: Now, like I said earlier, Tattle isn't Kiwi Farms. There are moderators. There are rules. But I'm not going to pretend that these sites are— that they're not hurtful. Like, I've seen things about myself on some snark forums that are wildly inaccurate and have hurt my feelings, particularly about my interior design skills. duck you, Kiwi Farms.
They did issue a correction that one of the comments the BBC used was misrepresented

 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I wonder whether somebody should write to thee Coroners Office, pointing out that it’s being reported as fact that Tattlelife caused the suicide but the inquest hasn‘t yet taken place?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I wonder whether somebody should write to thee Coroners Office, pointing out that it’s being reported as fact that Tattlelife caused the suicide but the inquest hasn‘t yet taken place?
In this messed up world we live in that could take a few turns

- that they highlight the fabrication's and exploitations as being attributed to her parenting
- or they choose not to ridicule her upbringing, poor parental choices and chronic online present at an early age and side with the lies as an easy case closure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5
In this messed up world we live in that could take a few turns

- that they highlight the fabrication's and exploitations as being attributed to her parenting
- or they choose not to ridicule her upbringing, poor parental choices and chronic online present at an early age and side with the lies as an easy case closure.
No, I think it would be worth the Coroner stating that nobody should be making statements ahead of the conclusion of the inquest.

Because nobody should be making statements on what caused her death before the inquest. Least of all the BBC.
It’s not about trying to influence the Coroner, it’s about the disregard for the due process and the authority. By the BBC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
The coroner hasn't even opened the investigation yet as they're waiting for the police to finish their investigation.

The police and coroner must be aware that the BBC, MPs, Daily Mail etc have either declared tattle the killer or heavily implied it?

Once Sophie stopped getting attention from blaming tattle, she moved on to blaming her mum and a friend on roblox. Labour should investigate all the MPs that repeated the made up stuff from "Dr" Jessica Taylor, they should have known better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
I really hope the BBC and GK Barry have realised all the damage they've done and in the background are trying to stop another tragedy unfolding that this time they will have been complicit in encouraging and enabling. They should have left this whole story alone.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 8