I noticed it’s on iplayer now, when did that happen?
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It was always on iPlayer, just promoted very poorly
Is she saying her family are controlling the narrative on troll pages? Covering your a again Sophie?
The way Dr Jessica Taylor used this tragedy to try and close tattle and get attention for her book is so disgusting I wouldn't have believed it had I not seen it. All the publications and MPs that took Dr Jess's claims as real should hang their head in shame, GK Barry, BBC, Daily Mail, Metro, the Sun, the Nerve, The right honourable Jess Asato MP, The right honourable Sir Mark Hendrick MP, Full large TV etc.
Sophie isn't well and the BBC, the Sun etc all giving her articles is making the whole situation so much worse for her family. None of them should have ever used it as a subject.
I read all the Sophie May Dickson threads and no one was attacking a child or abusing her. She did get a few stray comments due to the situation her mother put her in and about 6 posts don't look good now. But it was very mild compared to the criticism she got on her own tiktok and across facebook.
There is a lot to unpack on those stories, but that is for the police and coroner.
She has her own thread to post this on. As always, she’s only worried about the views (last photo).
In fact you could say it wasn't even promoted and in the end hardly anybody was interested in it.
The views were very low on youtube compared to other docs on the same BBC youtube channels.
The BBC ended up deleting their own comment that went down like a lead ballon talking about stalking after this doc showed worse stalking than has ever happened on tattle, and as a result all the replies to that calling out the BBC. Then they deleted a load more comments in the replies that weren't complimentary.
It was an embarrassment for everyone involved.
I hope OfCom investigates it for bias, misleading the audience and accuracy. People do not pay the BBC to pump out biased pro influencer documentaries.
The BBC ended up deleting their own comment that went down like a lead ballon talking about stalking after this doc showed worse stalking than has ever happened on tattle, and as a result all the replies to that calling out the BBC. Then they deleted a load more comments in the replies that weren't complimentary.
It was an embarrassment for everyone involved.
I hope OfCom investigates it for bias, misleading the audience and accuracy. People do not pay the BBC to pump out biased pro influencer documentaries.
Sophie's making the situation worse for herself by blaming her family for Princess's death IMO.Is she saying her family are controlling the narrative on troll pages? Covering your a again Sophie?
In her grief she will be looking to place blame anywhere else rather than reflecting on her behaviour as a mother. I do worry for her other daughter and hope she has a support network away from Sophie.
I’m surprised this wasn’t included in the BBCs fortnightly complaints report, I thought more people would have complained about her doorstepping SBs parents.
Fails to mention she grabbed both girls to fight adults outside a kebab shop at night Always someone else’s wrong doing.
Poor Princess, I don't understand all the messages that Sophie is posting but it's clear she's being pulled in different directions by all the people in her life. She had to deal with so much
The BBC shouldn't have used a grieving mother for content where it was so recent, let alone one whose child was in a very complicated situation and is an active police investigation. Who signed off on that??
GK Barry, the BBC and Dr Jessica Taylor should hang their head in shame over exasperating the whole situation. It must be traumatic for Princesses friends and family. But they never will acknowledge their role and will carry on being totally unaccountable.
it’ll probably become a bigger inquest for social services and their involvement and safeguarding.Poor Princess, I don't understand all the messages that Sophie is posting but it's clear she's being pulled in different directions by all the people in her life. She had to deal with so much
The BBC shouldn't have used a grieving mother for content where it was so recent, let alone one whose child was in a very complicated situation and is an active police investigation. Who signed off on that??
GK Barry, the BBC and Dr Jessica Taylor should hang their head in shame over exasperating the whole situation. It must be traumatic for Princesses friends and family. But they never will acknowledge their role and will carry on being totally unaccountable.
just sad that even in death this poor girl is being exploited by the adults in her life
Do you mean the BBC and GK Barry will probably cause it to be bigger inquest?
The whole thing is beyond tragic. In her life she was exploited. Now in her death the BBC, GK Barry and Dr Jessica Taylor (not a medical doctor for anyone that doesn't know about her - did a PhD years ago and is very dangerous influencer in the VAWG space that tells people to not take their meds and dont bother goiung to the police to report sexual assault as nothing will happen) are exploiting her.
Tattle was the only space that seemed to care about her exploitation and safeguarding in life. Now in death it's the same. But we're supposed to be the evil ones.
Would ofcom be interested?
I think these will be my last comments on this thread before I have to unfollow it because it’s all just so upsetting. As @alethophobia points out, Princess was exploited by adults who should have protected her in life, and they continue to do it even in death 
It really is all such a tragedy, my heart aches for her and her sister. How the BBC could think it was at all appropriate to commission a programme that used a teenager’s tragic death for point scoring when it is evidently still an incredibly complicated situation (and subject of an ongoing inquest) sickens me.
If I was GK Barry I’d be utterly ashamed to have put my name to this appalling attempt at “journalism”. I think she needs to stick to Gillette adverts.
A lot of the “evidence” Sophie has been sharing looks open to multiple interpretations. I take it she’s got Princess’s phone back from the inquest?
She claims Tattle mods are in cahoots with her mum. Where is evidence of this?
She claims family were allowing Princess to vape, and yet the SMD threads show videos taken from Sophie’s own stories when Princess was about 12 years old, vaping in front of her and not being discouraged.
All the Cinderella stuff just looks like the things I would ask of my teenagers to help with the running of the home they live in, and to teach them life skills as their parent. It certainly does not equate to “modern day slavery”.
There was obviously a lot of other stuff going on, but for Princess to have been removed from Sophie’s care and put into the care of “crackheads” either Sophie is bending the facts to serve her own narrative, or Social Services have an awful lot to answer for - the truth likely sits somewhere in the middle.
Whatever happened, one thing is very clear: That poor girl was exposed to situations no child ever should be, right from the moment she was flaunted on the telly as a tot. She wasn’t protected by her mother, when her mother failed her she wasn’t protected by family, and when they failed her, she wasn’t protected by public services.
She claims Tattle mods are in cahoots with her mum. Where is evidence of this?
She claims family were allowing Princess to vape, and yet the SMD threads show videos taken from Sophie’s own stories when Princess was about 12 years old, vaping in front of her and not being discouraged.
All the Cinderella stuff just looks like the things I would ask of my teenagers to help with the running of the home they live in, and to teach them life skills as their parent. It certainly does not equate to “modern day slavery”.
There was obviously a lot of other stuff going on, but for Princess to have been removed from Sophie’s care and put into the care of “crackheads” either Sophie is bending the facts to serve her own narrative, or Social Services have an awful lot to answer for - the truth likely sits somewhere in the middle.
Whatever happened, one thing is very clear: That poor girl was exposed to situations no child ever should be, right from the moment she was flaunted on the telly as a tot. She wasn’t protected by her mother, when her mother failed her she wasn’t protected by family, and when they failed her, she wasn’t protected by public services.
It really is all such a tragedy, my heart aches for her and her sister. How the BBC could think it was at all appropriate to commission a programme that used a teenager’s tragic death for point scoring when it is evidently still an incredibly complicated situation (and subject of an ongoing inquest) sickens me.
If I was GK Barry I’d be utterly ashamed to have put my name to this appalling attempt at “journalism”. I think she needs to stick to Gillette adverts.
Sophie’s situation needs an actual Panorama grown up documentary on it. Whatever your views on her, she’s not all there and hasn‘t demonstrated safe parenting of her daughters. The media shouldn’t be exploiting her now.
I imaging there are lots of things happening in the background with SS, lawyers, the Coroner, police etc and Sophie is just spiralling.
I imaging there are lots of things happening in the background with SS, lawyers, the Coroner, police etc and Sophie is just spiralling.