1. The sun has evidence to substantiate the claims
2. The BBC were given evidence that was serious enough to suspend HE
3. The victim's lawyers are high powered and multinational
Most fitting conclusion is that the victim WAS 17 when it happened, but he doesn't see himself as a victim and wanted the money.
Clearly (as per the Sun's evidence) if the victim was blackmailing HE for cash, he's money motivated, not "justice" motivated so he'd definitely take a payout in exchange for keeping his mouth shut.
Also, if the victim's income stream is OF/sex work, being discreet will keep clients.
His mum is likely justice motivated (reported that she didn't take any money for the story) so maybe she's at her wits end and wanted to see HE suffer consequences. Didn't involve the police because her son was involved in blackmailing him which is illegal. Just wanted to get him fired.
2. The BBC were given evidence that was serious enough to suspend HE
3. The victim's lawyers are high powered and multinational
Most fitting conclusion is that the victim WAS 17 when it happened, but he doesn't see himself as a victim and wanted the money.
Clearly (as per the Sun's evidence) if the victim was blackmailing HE for cash, he's money motivated, not "justice" motivated so he'd definitely take a payout in exchange for keeping his mouth shut.
Also, if the victim's income stream is OF/sex work, being discreet will keep clients.
His mum is likely justice motivated (reported that she didn't take any money for the story) so maybe she's at her wits end and wanted to see HE suffer consequences. Didn't involve the police because her son was involved in blackmailing him which is illegal. Just wanted to get him fired.