If this person has applied and been granted a super injunction (which I suspect he has) then they can't legally name him. The claims were made 2 months ago so that is time to get a gagging order in place.Just seems so weird that they haven’t released the name despite knowing it will be obvious. Plus without releasing it, the whole situation has been dragged on way more than normal as the whole country sits in suspense.
https://giphy.com/fJMWN7XnZM0hOBBC are reportedly naming the male in question today.
I personally don’t think that’s real. The witch hunt for Scoff (rightly so) would have unearthed lots of stuff. All of a sudden it comes out when everyone is speculating. Maybe his lawyers are involved. But doesn’t mean he would need to be public about it. If that was real there would be some sort of order to have it removed by now. As it could be used in court. I asked my gran what she would do if she was in HE position. Just for an age perspective. She said nothing if she wasn’t the person involved. She would be concentrating on keeping the family out of the way and getting things in order to sue everyone and everything any way she could as quite likely his career is over regardless of innocence. It’s tarnished him nowHe must know by now that the bum photograph is circulating - if that was fake I'd expect him to issue a statement refuting it and saying he was getting lawyers in. Like, immediately. The picture's been up for about 24 hours.
Cos they think they are untouchable / beyond the lawWhat I don't understand is how, if you are in the public eye, you risk your entire career and reputation on this sort of stuff but they do, time and time and time again. Makes zero sense to me.
This is just my povI personally don’t think that’s real. The witch hunt for Scoff (rightly so) would have unearthed lots of stuff. All of a sudden it comes out when everyone is speculating. Maybe his lawyers are involved. But doesn’t mean he would need to be public about it. If that was real there would be some sort of order to have it removed by now. As it could be used in court. I asked my gran what she would do if she was in HE position. Just for an age perspective. She said nothing if she wasn’t the person involved. She would be concentrating on keeping the family out of the way and getting things in order to sue everyone and everything any way she could as quite likely his career is over regardless of innocence. It’s tarnished him now
Can confirm nor deny - it's not there but we don't have confirmation it wasn't always absent.again sorry if this has been mentioned but i haven’t been able to catch up! sat with my friend atm and she’s said HE has deleted BBC off his twitter bio? dunno if anyone can confirm?
I thought that Clive’s reporting from Ukraine in the early days of the “special military operation” was exceptionally good. I hope it isn’t him!In this time of great difficulty, I would like to pay tribute to Clive Myrie.
Steadfast, trustworthy, Clive. Bet his DMs are full of sweet missives to his lovely wife about his adoration for her.
————
Quoting the above from the last thread. I realise it’s said a bit in jest but it’s really true. I really like Clive and think he does a great job. I wish he presented more stuff!
But not everything is black and white is it, was this young person already using drugs? Was HE suffering a mental breakdown when this started? Not that it would excuse it, but it can certainly cloud judgement and cause reckless behaviour.I've seen a few posts concerned for HEs mental heath.
IF it is HE and IF the young person in question is a drug addict, do you think any fucks were given about that young lads plight by the person getting their jollies?
Rather ironic reminder of the day the Queen died, that.I don't think they are going to announce anything on the 6 pm news.
He's been presenting the last few days, it won't be him.I thought that Clive’s reporting from Ukraine in the early days of the “special military operation” was exceptionally good. I hope it isn’t him!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?