BBC Presenter Scandal #3

StonedCyclist · Jul 10, 2023

Jwren said:
I for one believe them. I don’t see any reason they would put themselves through all this especially with someone so high profile which could land them in hot water if they’ve lied.

coz they are twunts. All about sales and revenue from the clicks. They dont care who they hurt.

UsedWeddingDress · Jul 10, 2023

Here's what I think -

Young person sells nudes and has made £35k out of it.
They have also developed a drug habit.
Mum sees this and reports it all to the BBC, which is where the person who was giving the young person all of this money works.
Young person is hooked on drugs and needs money so decides to get a lawyer to say it's all rubbish, in the hopes the money for drugs will continue to flow.

DM Me Hun · Jul 10, 2023

mchammerr said:
So say arl Huwey pops up at 10pm for the news, what then?

Well that leaves only one other plausible option

JingleBells21 · Jul 10, 2023

Thinking logically here.
17 year old, into drugs, somehow attracts the attention of an older well-known male. Engages in illicit activity, explicit photographs for which the wealthy man is willing to pay. The teen takes the money, either for continued activity or because he is blackmailing the celeb.
Mum finds out. Mum is naturally upset and her child naturally blames the celebrity for the sexual advances and the drug taking. Mum complains to the BBC who don’t do anything with it. Mum goes to the Sun.
In the meantime, the now 20 year old is being advised by a lawyer. He may have already signed an NDA, he may have been advised that taking money could be construed as blackmail. He may just want the whole story to go away so he can get on with his life.

It does sound similar to PSs situation where the young chap also denied the relationship. I think this story is true, it might not go any further and whoever the BBC presenter is will have blown up their life for a bit of titillation.

Perhaps the mum thinks the only way to get her child off drugs is to expose the presenter and therefore cut the funding off.

For the love of god though, just name him so we can move on!

grace28 · Jul 10, 2023

pommobear said:
That Sun article also says their initial article was "based on interviews and sworn statements from their worried parents".

Making me wonder if they've seen any actual evidence or if it is just one person's word against another at this point.
---

gB nEwS aRe ThE oNlY oNeS wIlLiNg To TeLl ThE tRuTh HuN

I agree.

The Sun must have offered the youngster a large sum for a tell all. The denying it all must be a greater value then taking the money but why.

givepeasachance · Jul 10, 2023

GN keeps being mentioned, please don't tell me we're taking another ride on the Tattle roller coaster. I honestly think I'd need hospital treatment

https://giphy.com/52FlsB16T5aNAdAm1U

Jwren · Jul 10, 2023

StonedCyclist said:
coz they are twunts. All about sales and revenue from the clicks. They dont care who they hurt.

I’m talking about the parents

Tofino · Jul 10, 2023

BirkenheadTranny said:
Uber eats is gonna go into meltdown tonight

oh that explains why my chippy took half an hour longer than it should and arrived a bit luke warm.

Joannabloggs · Jul 10, 2023

ImNotJeremyVine said:
If he's not actually a crack addict, maybe he's been saving up the money?

A retainer for a lawyer of that magnitude would be 10ks or 100ks of pounds and will run a credit check to see you can afford on goong costs, his legal fees must be being paid by someone else. What teenager do you know has that much money?!?! Law firms only do pro bond work generally for human rights or criminal cases.

Also you'd have to be on crack to enjoy that arse pic

givepeasachance · Jul 10, 2023

DM Me Hun said:
Well that leaves only one other plausible option

View attachment 2298904

I've been saying this along babe. I think I'm onto something so it's reassuring someone else is now seeing wot I'm seeing

Bowbow82 · Jul 10, 2023

GB news has mentioned the reason the person hasn’t been named is maybe because of extortion or blackmail. No one knows anything really do they at this point?!

grahamzxy · Jul 10, 2023

So nothing illegal, maybe a little sleazy...story over...

ABiggerBoat · Jul 10, 2023

Girl?

ishant · Jul 10, 2023

If nothing happened why is he suspended still / why won’t they just give us his name? Mr Innocent doesn’t sound as good

Jwren · Jul 10, 2023

UsedWeddingDress said:
Here's what I think -

Young person sells nudes and has made £35k out of it.
They have also developed a drug habit.
Mum sees this and reports it all to the BBC, which is where the person who was giving the young person all of this money works.
Young person is hooked on drugs and needs money so decides to get a lawyer to say it's all rubbish, in the hopes the money for drugs will continue to flow.

As his parents have just said how did he afford a lawyer?

Merpedy · Jul 10, 2023

Bowbow82 said:
GB news has mentioned the reason the person hasn’t been named is maybe because of extortion or blackmail. No one knows anything really do they at this point?!

I think everyone is going to try and backpedal over the coming hours/days or take a more middle of the road position

SendReceive · Jul 10, 2023

ABiggerBoat said:
Girl?

More evidence that the alleged victim is trans/NB, potentially.

Poptartty · Jul 10, 2023

GB news just said his parents stand by their claims - breaking news apparently

dressinggownofdoom · Jul 10, 2023

gossipgirlxxo said:
What snacks have we got for 10pm then?

I feel like I should get a bottle of wine in! An hour of our moral guardian Dan Wooton pontificating followed by the most awkward news at 10 ever

MissChief43 · Jul 10, 2023

InTheDollsHouse said:
Holy fuck!!

The young person’s lawyer has denied what the mother said!!!!!

So, the mother was the one blackmailing him all along? How crazy if all he did was send 1 pic & she's been riding him all this time. He stopped paying, she went to papers like she said she would if he cut her off. Tut tut. It's probably HER that is addicted to drugs by sounds of it.

BBC Presenter Scandal #3

Attachments

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency