Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

ImNotJeremyVine

Active member
Looks like money talks.
The son had never indicated any interest in taking this complaint further. It was the mother pulling th strings. As far as I'm concerned the whole affair was completely legal and above board and you are doing both Huw and this individual a huge disservice by suggesting otherwise.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

daisy2809

VIP Member
sorry haven't caught up as it's literally impossible to, but as someone who's been SA'd has it not been considered that perhaps the young person involved just doesn't want all this to come out? like, i personally never involved the police as i didn't want to relive everything, and would probably brand my mum telling others my situation as 'rubbish' too if i didn't want it to get out

(sorry if i've got the wrong end of the stick as i've only skimmed through articles)
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

Happy Lady

VIP Member
I said this morning that I had my doubts about the mother, as things seemed rather off. Well well, one point to Happy. 🥳
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21

explodeyourgoss

Active member
So Vanessa is raising questions about who is paying for this young person's expensive lawyer. This is the same Vanessa who supported Schofield, the very man who has been helping with his victim's legal fees! So she will defend an ITV perp but not a BBC one. Vile.

Vanessa on TalkTV - Twitter
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 21

Olebiscuitbarrel

VIP Member
I've been doing real life stuff all day so only just checking in, I'm hoping it's not Huw Edwards, I was sure it would turn out to be someone nobody knows from bbc radio outer hebrides...but also hoping we'll get some info at 6pm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21
I believe the mother. No doubt she was extremely distressed having found out what was going on. I know I would be.

The young person may well feel this is something they do not want to pursue and/or felt it wasn't something that was wrong in any way. Only the people involved know the truth.

Hopefully the family can get the help they need and any appropriate action is swiftly taken.

Doubt we will ever know who it was and the announcement on the news just now will probably signal an end to the matter.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

XNosey-parkerX

Well-known member
OK, so this person has, via lawyers, said its all rubbish. However didn't the BBC itself say others have come forward around the same presenter? So surely there's an investigation still needed and the presenter stays suspended?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21

XNosey-parkerX

Well-known member
Maybe the crack addiction the mum mentioned was relating to bum cracks, not drugs.

I've been here too long...delirium is setting in 😆
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 21

Sandor

Well-known member
Can I say with the deleting his social media, when you face false accusations, you literally want to hide. It happened to someone close to me (incidentally it was a person’s mother who made up a story and ran with it because she was mentally ill and having delusions but it still had to be investigated). It’s a feeling beyond shock and grief. It’s like your whole body stops existing and your mind no longer knows how to think. Everyone who was close to the accused took down/limited our social media. We just didn’t want to have to see the outside world/it see in. And this wasn’t a reported story etc as no charges were made (except against the mother but that’s a diff story entirely). Because of that I also know the devastation that follows false accusations because you still lose your life. And I do see this in the same way because that’s where social media etc went with this.

The BBC should absolutely be held to account to see if they’ve dealt with this appropriately. They have a duty of care and should be able to show they take all these instances seriously.

However, The Sun are known for their sensationalism and they have definitely used inflammatory, cleverly not-libellous language throughout this.

We also only have what the mother said as proof. There has been no evidence at all. For all we know, the person is on OF and the mother assumes that means they must be into drugs too but no one actually knows that’s definitely true. And what’s become clear is how the story has basically been ‘someone’s mother has told us this about their child, now the BBC need to investigate’

She’s got her wish if HE is taken off air though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21

Squittel

VIP Member
This is FASCINATING because it really is a case of ‘unreliable narrator’
Do I trust the sun? No.
Do I trust the bbc? No
Do I trust the word of a mother who went to the paper and not the police? No
Do I trust the bbc presenter who wiped his insta this afternoon? No
And do I trust the 20 year old, potential drug addict? No.
I think this basically sums the whole thing up rather well.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21

Jwren

VIP Member
It’s not really a case of victim blaming the lad because the lad has come out and said he isn’t a victim. The bigger question now is the parents motive.
Just maybe they were telling the truth and the son wants to brush it under the carpet because he might have been warned by the lawyers he could possibly face legal action if he’s been blackmailing the presenter and he might not have told that part to his parents.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 20
Well, this gets weirder & weirder!

I reckon that ‘something’ likely did happen. But the ‘victim’ did something ‘bad’ like blackmail or similar which is why Mum went to The Sun etc rather than the police (Also more money in going to The Sun)
Now either the family have had second thoughts, or the victim is playing it down or they’ve been paid off. Or it was a total lie. Very strange all round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 20